日期: Mar. 23, 2023
開會時間: 台灣時間週四 10:30pm CST / 紐約時間週四 10:30 am ET
會議流程:
參與者簽名:
Stamford
Zoey
Jiahe
連結:
場景:
任務:
# | 任務 | 類別 | 工具 | 經驗值 | Owner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 參加 Arm0ry 活動 | 鍊下 | - | 1 | |
2. | 建立代幣錢包 | 錢包 | MetaMask | 1 | Jiahe |
💧 | “轉賣DAO” 空頭 Goerli Eth | 空投 | - | - | |
3. | 鑄造 Traveler's Pass | NFT | Arm0ry | 1 | |
🌟 | Go rogue! | 錢包 | MetaMask | 3 | |
4. | 鑄造 ENS | NFT | ENS | 2 | Stamford |
5. | ENS 賣給 "轉賣DAO" | NFT, DAO | Kali | 1 or 2 | |
6. | 投票決定要不要收購 ENS | DAO | Kali | 1 | Charlie |
7. | 兑換穩定幣 | Defi | Uniswap | 1 or 2 | Zoey |
8. | 買塗鴉 NFT | NFT | OpenSea | 1 | |
9. | 前往 voxels.com 簽名 | 元宇宙 | Voxels | 1 |
與 Shuyen 對話:
Arm0ry Playground - Why do we need a School-42 style platform for web3 community building?
Notes on interview with Charlie
Credible neutrality is primary value proposition of crypto today. It's what allows for new forms of open and predictable money. It's what creates platforms where anyone can openly create and access new applications.
Lack of credible neutrality in existing platforms makes its importance clear. Central banks are not credibly neutral as platforms for money because a subset of stakeholders can decide to print money at will. Facebook and Twitter are not credibly neutral as platforms for applications because a subset of stakeholders can make changes that kill entire developer ecosystems.
It creates safety of value locked in a platform — both concrete (funds) and abstract (development time, users) — from theft, shutdown, and restriction.
可信的中立性是當今加密貨幣的主要價值主張。 這就是允許新形式的開放和可預測資金的原因。 它創造了任何人都可以公開創建和訪問新應用程序的平台。
現有平台缺乏可靠的中立性使其重要性顯而易見。 中央銀行作為貨幣平台並不是可信的中立的,因為一部分利益相關者可以決定隨意印鈔。 Facebook 和 Twitter 作為應用程序平台並不是可信的中立的,因為一小部分利益相關者可以做出殺死整個開發者生態系統的改變。
它創造了鎖定在平台中的價值安全——具體(資金)和抽象(開發時間、用戶)——免受盜竊、關閉和限制。
Topic Filtering/Curation (eg, each sub-reddit or hashtag has a token):
主題過濾/管理(例如,每個 sub-reddit 或主題標籤都有一個標記):Topic-based communities can coordinate around sharing information important to them. If effective curation occurs, it attracts new participants and thus a topic-based community that curates well, can collectively earn from doing so.
基於主題的社區可以圍繞共享對他們重要的信息進行協調。 如果發生有效的策展,它會吸引新的參與者,因此一個策展良好的基於主題的社區可以共同從中獲利。
Monetizing Open Source Projects:
開源項目貨幣化:Curation Markets allows open source projects to earn from the work they collectively create. Curation is important in order to make decisions together. Any open source project can have an associated curation market attached it, helping it to make sure what pull requests should be merged and what features to consider.
允許開源項目從他們共同創造的作品中獲利。 為了共同做出決定,策展很重要。 任何開源項目都可以有一個相關的管理市場,幫助它確定應該合併哪些拉取請求以及要考慮哪些功能。
Personal Attention Markets:
個人注意力市場:Our attention is increasingly the most important, and scarcest resource we have. We can earn from it. A person, as a beneficiary, can have an associated curation market attached to them. In order to curate the attention of individuals, participants who want to get your attention, needs to buy your curation market token and use it back/curate information it wants you to see.
我們的注意力越來越成為我們擁有的最重要、最稀缺的資源。 我們可以從中獲利。 一個人,作為受益人,可以有一個相關的策展市場。 為了管理個人的注意力,想要引起你注意的參與者需要購買你的管理市場代幣並使用它/管理它想讓你看到的信息。