RRG Meeting #7

• 
• "Each cash out increases the value of the next cash out, by a customizable rate." this is a little unclear—does it increase the cash out price (name of the bullet point) or the ETH return from cashing out?" => this was written this way to try to adress the comment from last meeting wrt "price" being confusing since there are always issuance and cash out exhcnages available.
• still need RF1 info, and visual of how all orgs tie together.
• part 3, categories and biz models dont all feel super clear. could use for tangible hypothetical examples.
• figure out what to do about cash out price and cash out price. lean more into tax. verbiage. "return" maybe?
• confusion about vending machine diagram labels. list the steps instead of inlining.
• when $NANA is brought up in section 2.1, it gets a little confusing again. Juicebox V4 / $NANA could br brought up sooner, why does it need to exist? l2 stuff.
• fee clarity. visual for fees and linkage between $REV and $NANA and others. explain the give and take of fees.
• make note of what types of things may could go streight to juicebox and skip revnets. or, elucidate how revnets work for simple fundraisors.
• is revnet ethereum's pump.fun or whatever? but anti-rug? values aligned? compare and contrast to popular tokenization tools. revnet.app, revnet.fun yolo?

RRG Meeting #6

• 
• meet with IRA to structure Fund as next step. Need to meet before adding specifics.
• ~2% management fee, what about performance fee? rob says itd be nice if we can do without the performance fee. lets see. we could only get qualified investors if there's a performance fee.
• 
• real bangers here and there. we need an audience who has no idea what revnets are.
• vending machine example could have a more full picture. video of full flow?
• overview is good (peri). could be shorter? goal could/should be to get all details down and get accurate narrative.
• (peri) stages of $REV token have lots of room for discussion. price increase every 90 days feels intimidating. could be 1.5x maybe? tax could also be intimidating. natural question as to why it's not going down over time.
• everyone's +1ing the outline for organizational structure and how things attach. left with questions about RF1, who is managing? how does the money move from fiat to onchain? what do i get in return.
• (mememan) what happens in a failure state? what does a failed state entail? maybe at a Part 3 case study section.
• The term "price" may be confusing. assumption that redemption price doubles is easy to make, despite it not working that way.
• (kmac) exit tax is a huge differentiator. people are getting educated on bonding curves.

RRG Meeting #5

• graphics, visuals.
• technicalities might can be punted and linked out. let the viewer ask the questions and lead them to the details. air on the side of shorter and punchier.
• technical todos into the future?
  
• glossary for terms. "stage", graphic. vending machine graphic?
• table formatting for stages.
• $REV conveyed more visually. Explanation of what a revnet is visually.
• assumed context feels missing. "Pay a token into a revnet. get the revnet's token out.". visuals could go a long way here.
  
• visual braindump from pablo: someone putting money into the vending machine => $REV, selling it back and getting $ETH. zooming out from the one revnet into a web of other revnets and see the energy pointing towards the central rev node.
• emphasize that the rules are set for life.
• simulator: lay out 2-4 templates, cohorts of types of projects.
• eject to a new revnet?

RRG Meeting #4

• tells the story better.
• details: dont lead with scars, "stories and experience".
• TLDR feedback: 3rd sentence didnt land immediately, didnt lead to it well. "This has too often led to misallocated resources" something doesnt quite work.
• where does network of networks fit in to the story? standardization, positive feedback loop from network effect of standardization and interconnectivity.

RRG Meeting #3

• "Legal moment" should lead into the problem that's trying to be solved. There are promises made, yet people leave. this is causing regulatory scrutiny. We discovered a better way of doing this that scales. Going right from there to a puppet show of a simple revnet anatomy

• Parenthetical, move the story of the upcoming projects to meet the team. i.e. get rid of

• Add emojis to help picture. It's too wordy and needs visualizations and metaphore.

• "it solves this specific problem, in this way" as clear as possible in the TLDR.

• in "overview" section give the reader a sense of where the rest of the text will go.

• tokenized projects are succeptible to a team abandoning promises and community for an easy payout with little to no consequences. commonly thought of as pump and dump. Dump on retail. Investor and team dump on retail. Insider and team dump on retail, abandoning implicit and explicit promises of future development and vision.

• Revnets incentivize long term sustainable growth, transparency, clear rules. without relying upon distributed and messy governance succeptible to negligence and overreach and insider manipulation.

• Add one clear well-known case study.

• Don't love the C-corp, DAO juxtaposition. Stick with "we're in the business of crypto", let historians figure out how it relates to legal entities.

• This is a serious proposal to clarify rules for fair growth-oriented distribution.

• TLDR seem conclusory. dont need conclusory. lets explain specifically what the problem is and how revnets address it.

• "These require a greater fool to buy and hold the bag, while other cash out, creating opaque ponzinomics with backdoors for insiders".

• Re-asses entity history. Maybe instead go with economic history: "Corporation separated management from owners… in this way we're also doing a thing". Prioritize stories.

• "here's your traditional P&L accounting format. we're doing it differently".

• correct analysis is game theory. analyse typical token launch from a game theoretic perspective. energy-capture dilemma.

• start with a quote from a famous credible person.

• "Revnets are the SAFE and C-Corp agreements of this economy but 100x better." => "Revnets are the equity agreements, accounting sheets, loyatly points of this economy but 100x better."?

RRG Meeting #2

Read PR: https://github.com/rev-net/pitch/blob/mejango-patch-1/pitch.md

Notes:

• Consider verbiage for LLC structure and fee.
• "Iteration of Juicebox V3 that has secures" typo
• In risk section, add space for Rob to disclose.
• Consider a TLDR to explain what revnets are. revnets for dummies.
• Prioritize how capitalization works, let me know how we make money early in the page. how big is the opportunity in $$$ terms.
• Dial down Juicebox context. 32 mentions of Juicebox, reduce to 20.
• Give Juicebox version better, why revnets evolves from where we were going with Juicebox.
• tell story of various different kinds of coins recently. ruggability. whims of the market liquidity.
• can rewards long term, corrects the incentive mechanism.
• "govrenance" typo.
• simplify the value prop smooth brain pitch. "how long did it take you to set up a corp and fundraise?".
• "Think of it like a fancy Bitcoin halvening rule.", move hier up.
• "Dominant organizational and financial models have always suited the technologies of their respective eras. In this era of internet-native businesses and AI, corporate-stock models of organization have become anachronistic." is memorable.