HackMD
    • Create new note
    • Create a note from template
    • Sharing Link copied
    • /edit
    • View mode
      • Edit mode
      • View mode
      • Book mode
      • Slide mode
      Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
    • Customize slides
    • Note Permission
    • Read
      • Only me
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
      Only me Signed-in users Everyone
    • Write
      • Only me
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
      Only me Signed-in users Everyone
    • Commenting & Invitee
    • Publishing
      Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
      Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.
      After the note is published, everyone on the web can find and read this note.
      See all published notes on profile page.
    • Commenting Enable
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
    • Invitee
    • No invitee
    • Options
    • Versions and GitHub Sync
    • Transfer ownership
    • Delete this note
    • Note settings
    • Template
    • Save as template
    • Insert from template
    • Export
    • Dropbox
    • Google Drive Export to Google Drive
    • Gist
    • Import
    • Dropbox
    • Google Drive Import from Google Drive
    • Gist
    • Clipboard
    • Download
    • Markdown
    • HTML
    • Raw HTML
Menu Note settings Sharing Create Help
Create Create new note Create a note from template
Menu
Options
Versions and GitHub Sync Transfer ownership Delete this note
Export
Dropbox Google Drive Export to Google Drive Gist
Import
Dropbox Google Drive Import from Google Drive Gist Clipboard
Download
Markdown HTML Raw HTML
Back
Sharing
Sharing Link copied
/edit
View mode
  • Edit mode
  • View mode
  • Book mode
  • Slide mode
Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
Customize slides
Note Permission
Read
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Write
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Comment & Invitee
Publishing
Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.
After the note is published, everyone on the web can find and read this note.
See all published notes on profile page.
More (Comment, Invitee)
Commenting Enable
Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
Permission
Owners
  • Forbidden
  • Owners
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Invitee
No invitee
   owned this note    owned this note      
Published Linked with GitHub
Like BookmarkBookmarked
Subscribed
  • Any changes
    Be notified of any changes
  • Mention me
    Be notified of mention me
  • Unsubscribe
Subscribe
# Organizing Beyond Organizations: Good News Stories from Spain and Taiwan C4SS Director William Gillis recently gave this talk in Austin, TX using the lenses of sociology, psychology, and information theory to explore the fundamental limitations of organizations. In other words, it’s a thorough explanation of why meetings suck. https://www.youtube.com/embed/dbDtjv_S55w?rel=0 Gillis presents a compelling explanation for the ineffectiveness of many political organizations, focussed on some of the inescapable artefacts of human communication. Paraphrasing some of the salient points: * Knowledge problems: language is a [lossy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression) [codec](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec) for communicating our internal experiences to other agents, leaving an immense gap between words and meanings. * Computation problems: tools like wikis and markets are subject to the massive efficiency gains of [concurrency](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrency_(computer_science)) as they decentralize communication both in time and space. But most radical organizations prefer consensus meetings, which are severely constrained by the extremely low bandwidth channel of sequential one-at-a-time utterances. * Tirbalism: in organizations, the cognitive biases and psychological needs of most humans act as a constant pressure to prioritise the self-preservation of our collecitve identities ahead of measurable progress towards shared aims. However, while the critique is illuminating, I found myself unsatisfied, wishing that they had offered more light at the end of the tunnel. Frankly I don't care for critique without reconstruction. Through my work at [Loomio](https://loomio.org) I'm connected with social movements around the world, as they use our collective decision-making software. These international connections give me great optimism, as I see new developments in organizing strategy and digital technology overcoming the limitations outlined in Gillis' talk. Optimism is more fun when you share it, so I wanted to document two cases that I think are worth emulating. The movements I'm most inspired by are inspiring precisely because of their combined competencies in **organizational** and **technological development**. Namely they are: 1. [The international municipalists informally headquartered in Spain](https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/fearlesscities-introducing-a-global-municipalist-network-b364f10c25ea). 2. [The conservative anarchists building new democratic forms in Taiwan](https://civichall.org/civicist/vtaiwan-democracy-frontier/). Organized citizens in Spain have made an extraordinary demonstration of the necessity of making uncomfortable coalitions (they talk about "complicated majorities"). You see this when distinct organisations temporarily coordinate in service of one shared issue, disbanding after victory. Radical leftists are working shoulder-to-shoulder with organised labour, with immigrant groups, with progressive politicians and social entrepreneurs. [Stacco Troncoso credits](https://teamhuman.fm/episodes/ep-68-stacco-troncoso-the-commons-is-the-glue/) this practice of coalition-building as the primary factor in keeping the far right mostly out of action in Spain. It's hard to fuel the hate-fires between tribes when they are being continuously reminded of their shared interests, and continuously invited into acts of mutual aid (e.g. the old unemployed factory worker loses some of his xenophobia when the immigrants show up to prevent his home eviction). Another uncomfortable coalition you see in Spanish cities is the collaboration between A) the people who understand the state apparatus as a means of redirecting civil unrest it into channels that support the status quo, and B) the people who understand the state apparatus as one of the most effective levers in catalysing social change. In most parts of the world this is a boring argument between radicals and liberals, an endless ping pong match where each team claims to have the One True Strategy while the Evil Others are undermining the struggle. In Spain activists have made peace with this tension, courageously taking the reins of institutional power while maintaining the grassroots mandate and accountability. For example: [the most radical political conference I've been to](http://2017.fearlesscities.com/) was mindblowing not just because the speakers were incredible, but especially when you consider the event was hosted by the same people who run the Barcelona city government. To name this tension between street movements and institutional power, in Madrid they coined the term [extituion](https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-madrid-p2p-commune/2014/05/25): "If institutions are organizational systems based on an inside-outside framework, extitutions are designed as areas where a multitude of agents can spontaneously assemble." (The same author has named [Cooperation Jackson](https://cooperationjackson.org/) as a U.S. example of the same phenomenon.) All of this extremely promising organisational innovation is enmeshed with technological innovation. I'm immensely encouraged by the [deep collaboration between political scientists and computer scientists that I've seen in Spain](https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/commons-technology-and-the-right-to-a-democratic-city-9dce13043f5b), which holds a rigorous critique of proprietary "sharing economy" and "smart cities" software, while also prototyping [tools for direct democracy](https://dcentproject.eu/). Similarly, you see elements of the same "organizational + technological innovation" recipe at play in Taiwan. In 2014 their occupy movement won. Since then they’ve been dramatically reformatting the government, moving beyond political parties, and deploying technology for mass citizen participation in law-making. This 4 minute video from open source hacker turned movement spokesperson turned digital minister Audrey Tang is a great introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRUcmRzDe4A In Taiwan as in Spain, the credibility of the new political actors is rooted in the streets. Second, those actors have deployed a rigorous political strategy, systematically making allies throughout the public & private sectors, and civil society. The folks from [vTaiwan](https://info.vtaiwan.tw/) told me how they interviewed every state official they could find, and used the results to map out which government departments were most ready to concede decision-making power to citizens. Then they used those early engagements as leverage, playing departments off each other in a competition for who could be the most participatory. That is the kind of strategic genius that could be repeated the world over. On the tech front, you see a dual strategy: comprehensive research of existing tools, plus regular hackathons for developing new tools. Perhaps the best-documented example of this approach is [the vTaiwan Uber case](https://blog.pol.is/uber-responds-to-vtaiwans-coherent-blended-volition-3e9b75102b9b), where Uber drivers, taxi drivers, citizens, and officials efficiently found the region of their agreement using a combination of face-to-face deliberation and digital sentiment mapping using [pol.is](http://pol.is/). Perhaps most importantly, these processes are being hosted by people who appreciate the immense skill required to facilitate multi-stakeholder deliberation, who are up-to-speed with the palette of tools available, and who are pre-emptively [mitigating the risks of "open-washing"](http://blulu.tw). In 4 years of hobbyhorsing, I've met exactly 2 other westerners who were familiar with the Taiwan story before I told them about it. I realise I sound like a stuck record. I feel like I'm in a little bubble where nobody seems to care much about these stories. I don't know who else is capturing the lessons, building the transnational networks, and remixing strategies into their local context. So I'm confused, like, am I an early adopter way ahead of the curve, or am I making a mountain of a molehill, or am I just hanging out with the wrong people? ## Bio Richard D. Bartlett is a cofounder of [Loomio](https://loomio.org), an open source software tool for collective decision-making, and of [The Hum](https://thehum.org) offering practical guidance for decentralised organizations. He's also a Catalyst at Enspiral: a network of self-organising companies who have been working without bosses since 2010. He's passionate about co-ownership, self-management, collaborative governance, and other ways of sneaking anarchism into respectable places. He writes at [richdecibels.com](http://richdecibels.com)

Import from clipboard

Advanced permission required

Your current role can only read. Ask the system administrator to acquire write and comment permission.

This team is disabled

Sorry, this team is disabled. You can't edit this note.

This note is locked

Sorry, only owner can edit this note.

Reach the limit

Sorry, you've reached the max length this note can be.
Please reduce the content or divide it to more notes, thank you!

Import from Gist

Import from Snippet

or

Export to Snippet

Are you sure?

Do you really want to delete this note?
All users will lost their connection.

Create a note from template

Create a note from template

Oops...
This template is not available.


Upgrade

All
  • All
  • Team
No template found.

Create custom template


Upgrade

Delete template

Do you really want to delete this template?

This page need refresh

You have an incompatible client version.
Refresh to update.
New version available!
See releases notes here
Refresh to enjoy new features.
Your user state has changed.
Refresh to load new user state.

Sign in

Forgot password

or

By clicking below, you agree to our terms of service.

Sign in via Facebook Sign in via Twitter Sign in via GitHub Sign in via Dropbox

New to HackMD? Sign up

Help

  • English
  • 中文
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Català
  • Ελληνικά
  • Português
  • italiano
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
  • Nederlands
  • hrvatski jezik
  • język polski
  • Українська
  • हिन्दी
  • svenska
  • Esperanto
  • dansk

Documents

Tutorials

Book Mode Tutorial

Slide Mode Tutorial

YAML Metadata

Contacts

Facebook

Twitter

Discord

Feedback

Send us email

Resources

Releases

Pricing

Blog

Policy

Terms

Privacy

Cheatsheet

Syntax Example Reference
# Header Header 基本排版
- Unordered List
  • Unordered List
1. Ordered List
  1. Ordered List
- [ ] Todo List
  • Todo List
> Blockquote
Blockquote
**Bold font** Bold font
*Italics font* Italics font
~~Strikethrough~~ Strikethrough
19^th^ 19th
H~2~O H2O
++Inserted text++ Inserted text
==Marked text== Marked text
[link text](https:// "title") Link
![image alt](https:// "title") Image
`Code` Code 在筆記中貼入程式碼
```javascript
var i = 0;
```
var i = 0;
:smile: :smile: Emoji list
{%youtube youtube_id %} Externals
$L^aT_eX$ LaTeX
:::info
This is a alert area.
:::

This is a alert area.

Versions

Versions and GitHub Sync

Sign in to link this note to GitHub Learn more
This note is not linked with GitHub Learn more
 
Add badge Pull Push GitHub Link Settings
Upgrade now

Version named by    

More Less
  • Edit
  • Delete

Note content is identical to the latest version.
Compare with
    Choose a version
    No search result
    Version not found

Feedback

Submission failed, please try again

Thanks for your support.

On a scale of 0-10, how likely is it that you would recommend HackMD to your friends, family or business associates?

Please give us some advice and help us improve HackMD.

 

Thanks for your feedback

Remove version name

Do you want to remove this version name and description?

Transfer ownership

Transfer to
    Warning: is a public team. If you transfer note to this team, everyone on the web can find and read this note.

      Link with GitHub

      Please authorize HackMD on GitHub

      Please sign in to GitHub and install the HackMD app on your GitHub repo. Learn more

       Sign in to GitHub

      HackMD links with GitHub through a GitHub App. You can choose which repo to install our App.

      Push the note to GitHub Push to GitHub Pull a file from GitHub

        Authorize again
       

      Choose which file to push to

      Select repo
      Refresh Authorize more repos
      Select branch
      Select file
      Select branch
      Choose version(s) to push
      • Save a new version and push
      • Choose from existing versions
      Available push count

      Upgrade

      Pull from GitHub

       
      File from GitHub
      File from HackMD

      GitHub Link Settings

      File linked

      Linked by
      File path
      Last synced branch
      Available push count

      Upgrade

      Danger Zone

      Unlink
      You will no longer receive notification when GitHub file changes after unlink.

      Syncing

      Push failed

      Push successfully