In this call, we covered two major areas: (1) builder → proposer payment design, (2) fork choice signaling, and briefly discussed alternate designs and slot time implications.
1. Builder → Proposer Payment
The current 7732 spec changes the builder-to-proposer payment flow in a way that may break existing staking pool contracts, requiring them to rewrite and re-audit their infra. We discussed two simple alternatives to preserve compatibility:
Pay to the proposer’s withdrawal address
Add a new field in the bid to specify a fee recipient (similar to validator registration today)
Both options keep the payment within the CL, not EL. Lido (on the call) indicated this would be sufficient for their needs.