interpolation
In this note, we will construct a QG regularization on sea surface height by using the QG PDE which relates SSH to potential vortity and the stream function. We will convert all variables within the QG PDE to SSH.
I document some mistakes I made from the derivation as pointed out by me or others
4-09-2022
22-09-2022
The learned function,
The standard loss term is data-driven
However, there is no penalization to make the field behave the way we would expect. We also want a regularization which makes the field,
This loss term can be minimized by effectively minimizing a PDE function. For example:
where
The PDE for this method will be the quasi-geostrophic (QG) equation which the potential vorticity and a stream function. In the following section, we will show how this equation can be modified to act as a physics-informed regularization term on the loss function.
We have the following PDE for the QG dynamics:
where
Objective: We want to convert this PDE in terms of sea surface height (SSH) instead of PV and the stream function.
Note: For the ease of notation, let's denote
where
Let's define the relationship between the SSH,
where
To simplify the notation, we will factor out the constant,
Note: we used the property that
QED.
Now, let's define the relationship between the stream function and the PV. This is given by:
where
where
Now, we can expand this equation but first let's break this up into two terms:
Now we will tackle both of these terms one at a time.
Term I
So term I is:
We can expand this via the partial derivative,
So plugging this back into the PDE gives us:
Term II
We can factorize this determinant Jacobian term.
And furthermore, we can factor out the constants
And lastly, we can remove the final term because the determinant Jacobian of the same function is zero. So we have:
QED.
So term II is:
We know the definition of the determinant of the Jacobian for a vector-valued function,
If use this identity with term II, we get:
Again, let's split this up into two subterms and tackle them one-by-one.
Term IIa
We have the following term for Term IIa:
We can expand the terms to get the following:
And we can simplify, by factoring out constants, to get:
Term IIb
We can expand the terms to get the following:
Combined (Term IIa, IIb)
We can substitute all of these two terms into our original expression
If we group the terms by operators,
So each of these terms are determinant Jacobian terms,
We have the final form for our PDE in terms of SSH,
Finally, we can see that the final term is zero because it's the determinant Jacobian of itself. So we are left with:
QED.
So we have the final form for our PDE in terms of SSH.
We will factor out a constant term
I will multiply everything by a negative 1 so that we have a PDE of the form: