# Online Ads & Blockers *Knowing what we know about online advertising, should users be able to easily block ads? If so, who then pays for the free content and services we consume?* Therefore, users should be able to easily block ads on the internet to protect themselves against malware and to protect their privacy. While there are many companies who value ethical intake of users’ data, there are many more who are not transparent with how data is collected and how it is used. As mentioned in Sven Taylor’s article about the issues on the Acceptable Ads Program, advertising networks may install trackers to analyze a person’s online activity and sell that information to other networks (2020). After reading this article, I found myself realizing that my ad-blocker, uBlocker, takes part in this program and will be looking to see if I can opt out, or if I need to look for an entirely new ad-blocker. In addition, Don Marti brings up the interesting topic of target advertising and its issues as to how users’ privacy is invaded due to advertisement tracking (2020). All in all, users should be easily able to block ads that they feel are too targeted to them to allow for their privacy to be respected and reduce the chance of spreading malware. The issue that comes with ad-blockers is how will services on the internet continue to function and get monetized? In my opinion, I believe that online advertising companies will still pay for these services, however they should change their practices to be more ethical. As Don Marti states, there are plenty of ethical ways for online advertisers to make money without being able to track users. At the end of his article, Marti discusses legislation that aims to stop track from online advertisers, which would push digital marketing in a more ethical, innovative direction (2017). And, as content sites do better when their users aren’t as targeted, these free sites and services will see improvement in content and ad engagement. Overall, online advertisers will continue to pay for the free content and services on the internet, but the way that they approach how to do so should include open conversations with online partners, and how to reduce the amount of targeted content that is spread on their websites. For this ad-blocker exercise, I took an example from one of my favorite sites to browse, Pinterest. I’ve had uBlocker installed for a long time and I’ve always noticed how different the home feed looks like with/without ads. The first picture shows what my Pinterest feed looks like without the ads. With the white blocks where the ads are meant to be, the feed looks a lot less appealing. On the other hand, the second picture shows my feed with ads. Interestingly, disabling my ad blocker is something I often do on Pinterest, as I enjoy the experience of scrolling through Pinterest seamlessly. However, I wonder if this is simply some type of glitch within my ad blocker, or if Pinterest purposely makes it look like that to get users to disable their ad-blockers for more capital gain. ### Pinterest Feed without Ads ![Imgur](https://i.imgur.com/67fHKIL.jpg) ### Pinterest Feed with Ads ![Imgur](https://i.imgur.com/tQP3eJc.jpg)