# ODIN S3 Study Group Meeting Agenda - February 20, 2024

[](https://hackmd.io/sQ6Lg85JTmiY7FQ_ZrHbxg)

<img src="https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SkOvXkijT.png" width="200" height="200">

This is the agenda for the ODIN Community Meeting on February 20, 2024. The agenda is community created. Since we have only an hour, some contributions to the agenda migbt not have time, in which case, tbey can be added to the next one. We'll spend a few minutes at the beginning prioritizing the agenda items based on emergent need and who shows up.

## 🛠 Resources
- Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVMFump0c=/?share_link_id=243807558162
- [Past Agendas](https://hackmd.io/@xeeban?tags=%5B%22Agenda%22%5D)

## ✅ Agenda
### Meeting Start (15m)

- Welcome and check-ins
- Agenda Review and prioritization
- Announcements

### Agenda Items (40m)
(feel free to add below)
- Randall's proposal
- Situation and Result: We value being able to explore through the topic landscape without overexpressing formality; this, however, limits effectiveness because of low directionality of time-usage.
- Situation and Result: We do look at, and discuss, material about S3, without actually gaining habits and experience with it in our weekly calls, so S3 elements are learned piecemeal, but not truly understood experientially.

- Proposed: Try for at least 4 weeks adopting a practice in this study group of:
- **focusing on our adopted driver**(s) at the start of each call
- quickly **identifying any new or recurring tensions** vs those drivers (which, given our scope of focus, are likely to mention one of the S3 patterns, and be a source of emergence and exploration)
- **choosing at least one of them** to develop into a driver and/or proposal
- **individually doing some driver or proposal development**
- and then **practicing consent** process on one of them using rotating roles.
- META:
- Update the agenda template accordingly, to simply remind us to do it and how.
- Measure now informally:
- Are some key S3 habits becoming more natural for me now? **1-5 scale**
- Is the group's effectiveness improved by these practices? **1-5 scale**
- Measure: number of proposals concluding in an agreed result (rejections ok)
- Measure: time to achieve consent on them
- Check in & measure again after 4 weeks, with a simple & informal poll: It worked if we get a predominance of improvement.
- Roberto: Concern: use simplicity in proposal-template format
- Nori: Objection: measurability needed. *updated with **Scales for polling***
- Juan: Concern: for the activity to be moving us in the intended direction
- Newman: Understanding: need to better visualize how it will work
- Jeremy: Suggestion: Measure current poll result.
- Jeremy: Gov logbook administration
- FUTURE tension??
- Roberto: Improvement: success-rate & time required for reaching agreement? *updated with **Measure:{number, time}...***
- today: +1, 40 minutes
- Roberto: future tension: improve clarity on consent process

- focusing on the driver
- id tensions relating
- choose one to make a proposal
- idivdual purposeful practice
- then a consent process
- timeframe: 4 weeks
- prompting for understanding
- We were not funded, now what?
- Edu Circle 2 min free talk with Newman
- micro vocab activity - S3 game
- talking about one term - steady micro progress - and documentation - role cards (proposer, tuner, ), can be quick and fun, loose, playful. Maybe NOT having stakes.
- micro steps - practice vocab or process
- todo: make a proposal
- resoure: https://patterns.sociocracy30.org/glossary.html
- s3PBL - activity
- What are the tensions in the EDU circle?
- Most Elegant Next Steps
#### Backlog Items for next time
- We were not funded, now what?

### Meeting End (5m)
- Check out

## 📝 Meeting Notes
- Taken by: