# Questionaire Questions
The bold ones reperesent the questions for each question, the percentage next to the questions are the maximum percentage for that specific question.
Example with 2 questions:
**Is it a cool proejct?* 20% - This question gives max 20%
- Yes (100%) - It will give 100% of that 20% so the question will give 20% at the end
- It's ok (50%) - It will give 50% of that 20% so the question will give 10% at the end
- No (0%) - It will give 0% of that 20% so the question will give 0% at the end

The total value of the questions are represented as 100%. Which is gonig to be the 80% the rest 20% is done through the quality slider.

## For All Projects
**Is the project description informal?** (10%)
- Yes it's straight to the point (100%)
- Need more description (50%)
- Not too descriptive (0%)

**Is the language / grammar correct?** (20%)
- Yes (100%)
- A few mistakes (50%)
- It's pretty bad (0%)

**Was the template followed?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Partially (50%)
- No (0%)

The questions above take 40% for all contribution. So 60% left for project related questions

### Development
**What kind of code contribution is this?** (30%)
- Serius Security fix (100%)
- Completely new project (80%)
- Contains Bugfixes and new features (80%)
- New Feature (50%)
- Not a Security fix (20%)

**How important is the feature / bugfix for the project?** (30%)
- Very important (100%)
- Important (75%)
- Less Important (50%)
- Not important (25%)

### Blog posts
**Is there visual content in the contribution?** (25%)
- Yes (100%)
- Yes, but bad quality (50%)
- No (0%)

**Is this a unique blog post?** (25%)
- Yes (100%)
- Not so unique (50%)
- No (0%)

**Is the blog post structured?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Not so good (50%)
- No (0%)

### Tutorials
**It there information about the additonal frameworks??** (10%)
- Yes, everything is explained (100%)
- Yes, but not enough (50%)
- No, detail at all (0%)

**Is there code in the tutorial?** (20%)
- Yes, and it's well explained (100%)
- Yes, but no explanation (50%)
- No (0%)

**Is the visual content good quality?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Bad quality (50)
- No, visual content (0%)

**Is this a tutorial series?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Yes, but first part (50%)
- No (0%)

**Is the tutorial post structured?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Not so good (50%)
- No (0%)

### Translations
**How many translated words?** (10%)
- 2000+ (100%)
- 1500-2000 (50%)
- 1000-1500 (0%)

**Are there any traces of machine translation?** (20%)
- No (100%)
- Yes (0%)

**Is there code that shouldn't be translated?** (20%)
- No (100%)
- Yes (0%)

**Is this a proofreading contribution??** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- No (0%)

### Graphics
**This contribution is a ?** (10%)
- Merged / Used art work (100%)
- Proposal (0%)

**How many art work is available in the contribution?** (10%)
- 10+ (100%)
- 5-10 (75%)
- 2-3 (50%)
- 1 (25%)

**Is the license present for the contribution?** (20%)
- Yes (100%)
- No (0%)

**Quality of images?** (20%)
- Good quality (100%)
- Acceptable (50%)
- Bad Quality (0%)

### Bug Reports
**Is the bug report formal / informal?** (40%)
- Yes straight to the point (100%)
- No steps to reproduce (50%)
- Not too informal and formal (0%)

**Is there visual presentation provided for the bug?** (10%)
- Yes (100%)
- Yes but low quality (50%)
- No (0%)

**Is there any unrelated content in the bug report?** (10%)
- No, only talk about the bug report (100%)
- Yes, personal intro or other unrelated content (0%)

### Visibility
**Kind of visibility?** (10%)
- Person to Person Meeting (100%)
- Presentation, or Youtube (50%)
- Online (0%)