During the workshop In pursuit of fair co-creation at #DINAcon18, we discussed time-bounded collaborative events, like …
(turn to next page)
Every weekend, masses of people take part in hackathons around the world. From corporate innovation labs to chaotic co-creation jams, from competitive coding to cooperative making, from nondisclosure to open license, there are hackathons for everyone's taste.
Yet, despite common labels, such as 'hackathon' or ‘hackday’, their goals vary greatly. This creates ambiguity that is exploited for work precarization.
To set up the grounds for a discussion, we put together a reading list together with researchers from the Bern University of Applied Science:
You'll find this and more in our workshop outline:
We also proposed an ‚open data driven model‘ for time-bounded events:
You can read more about this on GitHub: dribdat issue #112 .. or just look at how it is implemented on these sites:
At the DINAcon workshop, we covered fundamentals:
And together with participants, we built (in a collaborative manner, of course!) a list of attractors and detractors for participation in hackathons.
This inspired us to, during the #hacknight later that day, to start putting the list into a flowchart.
The flowchart is a playful* way to describe the metadata that we believe should be exposed by every hackathon in order to provide fair conditions to decide attendance. It may help to: