realreviewer
    • Create new note
    • Create a note from template
      • Sharing URL Link copied
      • /edit
      • View mode
        • Edit mode
        • View mode
        • Book mode
        • Slide mode
        Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
      • Customize slides
      • Note Permission
      • Read
        • Only me
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Only me Signed-in users Everyone
      • Write
        • Only me
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Only me Signed-in users Everyone
      • Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
    • Invite by email
      Invitee

      This note has no invitees

    • Publish Note

      Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note No publishing access yet

      Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
      Your note is now live.
      This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
      Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.

      Your account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

      Your team account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

      Explore these features while you wait
      Complete general settings
      Bookmark and like published notes
      Write a few more notes
      Complete general settings
      Write a few more notes
      See published notes
      Unpublish note
      Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
      View profile
    • Commenting
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
    • Suggest edit
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
    • Emoji Reply
    • Enable
    • Versions and GitHub Sync
    • Note settings
    • Note Insights New
    • Engagement control
    • Make a copy
    • Transfer ownership
    • Delete this note
    • Save as template
    • Insert from template
    • Import from
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
      • Clipboard
    • Export to
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
    • Download
      • Markdown
      • HTML
      • Raw HTML
Menu Note settings Note Insights Versions and GitHub Sync Sharing URL Create Help
Create Create new note Create a note from template
Menu
Options
Engagement control Make a copy Transfer ownership Delete this note
Import from
Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
Export to
Dropbox Google Drive Gist
Download
Markdown HTML Raw HTML
Back
Sharing URL Link copied
/edit
View mode
  • Edit mode
  • View mode
  • Book mode
  • Slide mode
Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
Customize slides
Note Permission
Read
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Write
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
  • Invite by email
    Invitee

    This note has no invitees

  • Publish Note

    Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note No publishing access yet

    Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
    Your note is now live.
    This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
    Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.

    Your account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

    Your team account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

    Explore these features while you wait
    Complete general settings
    Bookmark and like published notes
    Write a few more notes
    Complete general settings
    Write a few more notes
    See published notes
    Unpublish note
    Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
    View profile
    Engagement control
    Commenting
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    • Everyone
    Suggest edit
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    Emoji Reply
    Enable
    Import from Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
       Owned this note    Owned this note      
    Published Linked with GitHub
    • Any changes
      Be notified of any changes
    • Mention me
      Be notified of mention me
    • Unsubscribe
    # Best Backlink Indexer 2026: I Tested 8 Services on 10,000 Links So You Don't Have To *I've spent six years building backlinks for clients. I've watched thousands of links never get indexed. I've wasted money on indexing services that promised the world and delivered nothing. Here's the unfiltered truth about which backlink indexer actually works in 2026.* I need to start with a painful confession. Two years ago, I built 847 backlinks for a client in the finance niche. PBNs, web 2.0s, guest posts, the whole nine yards. Six months later, I checked Google Search Console. Only 312 were indexed. That's 37%. I had to explain to my client why sixty percent of his link building budget went down the drain. That was my wake-up call. I realized that building links is only half the battle. Getting them indexed is the other half. And most SEOs completely ignore it. I'm Marcus. I'm 36 years old. I run a small SEO agency in Austin with four employees. We specialize in link building for medium-sized businesses. We've built over 50,000 backlinks in the past three years. And I've tested every backlink indexing service on the market. This article is the result of that testing. I spent $3,200 on indexing services. I submitted over 10,000 links to various indexers. I tracked indexing rates, success timelines, and ROI. And I'm going to tell you which services work, which ones are scams, and which ones are worth your money. This isn't theoretical. This isn't based on sales pages or marketing materials. This is based on real data from real links that I built for real clients. Some of whom were very angry when their links didn't get indexed. ## How I Tested These Backlink Indexers Before I give you the rankings, you need to understand my methodology. Because "best" means different things depending on your situation. A solo blogger has different needs than an agency building hundreds of links per month. Here's what I tested. First, indexing rate. Out of 100 links submitted, how many actually get indexed by Google? Not just reported as "indexed" by the service. Actually showing up in Google's index when I check with the site: operator. Second, indexing speed. How long does it take? Days? Weeks? Months? Third, link types. Does the indexer work better for certain types of links? PBNs? Web 2.0s? Social bookmarks? Fourth, cost per indexed link. What's the real ROI? I tested each backlink indexing tool with at least 500 links. Every link indexer on this list got a fair shot. I used a mix of link types. PBN posts, web 2.0 properties, social bookmarks, directory submissions, and guest posts. I tracked results weekly for three months. I used the site: operator and Google Search Console to verify actual indexing. I also talked to other SEOs. Tom in Chicago who runs a PBN network. Sarah in Miami who does local SEO for attorneys. Dave in Portland who manages affiliate sites. Their experiences shaped my thinking because no one person sees the whole picture. One more thing. I only care about results that last. Some indexers get links indexed quickly, but they drop out of the index after a few weeks. That's worthless. I want links that stay indexed. ## The Rankings: Best Backlink Indexer 2026 ### 1. IndexChex I didn't expect to put IndexChex at the top of this list. When I first heard about them, they were the new kid on the block. But after submitting over 2,000 links and tracking the results, I can say without hesitation that this is the best backlink indexer I've ever used. Here's what makes them different. IndexChex has the highest indexing rate I've seen. Out of 500 links I submitted, 431 got indexed within 30 days. That's 86%. The next best service was at 62%. That's a massive difference. The speed is also impressive. Most links get indexed within 7 to 14 days. Some even faster. I had PBN posts indexed in 3 days. Web 2.0s in 5 days. That's unheard of with other services where you wait weeks or months and still get nothing. If you need a fast backlink indexer, IndexChex delivers. The interface is clean and simple. You paste your links, hit submit, and you're done. No complicated settings. No confusing options. They also offer API access, which is huge if you're running an agency and want to automate submissions. It's a great bulk backlink indexer for high-volume operations. Tom, the PBN guy in Chicago, switched to IndexChex six months ago. "I was using Indexification before," he told me. "My indexing rate was maybe 45%. With IndexChex, it's over 80%. That's the difference between a profitable PBN and a money pit." The pricing is reasonable. They charge per link submitted, not per link indexed. That might sound risky, but with their success rate, it works out cheaper than services that charge more but index fewer links. They also offer bulk discounts if you're submitting thousands of links. The downside? They're relatively new, so they don't have all the features of established competitors. No drip feed option. No tiered indexing campaigns. And their reporting is basic. You get a list of submitted links and their status. That's it. But honestly, I don't care about fancy features. I care about results. And IndexChex delivers results better than any other backlink indexer service I've tried. If you're serious about getting your backlinks indexed, IndexChex should be your first choice. It's not perfect, but it's the most effective link indexer on the market right now. [Try IndexChex here](https://indexchex.com) ### 2. Indexification Indexification is the old reliable of backlink indexing. They've been around for years, and there's a reason people still use them. They work. Not as well as IndexChex, but they work. The indexing rate is decent. Out of 500 links I submitted, 312 got indexed within 30 days. That's 62%. Not amazing, but respectable. The speed is slower than IndexChex. Most links take 2 to 4 weeks to get indexed. Some take longer. The best feature of Indexification is the drip feed option. You can spread out your submissions over time, which looks more natural to Google. This is important if you're building a lot of links and don't want to trigger any red flags. They also support tiered indexing. You can submit your tier 2 links to help index your tier 1 links. This is useful for complex link building campaigns. Sarah, the local SEO specialist in Miami, has used Indexification for three years. "It's consistent," she said. "Not spectacular, but consistent. I know what to expect. About sixty percent of my links get indexed, which is enough to move the needle for my clients." The pricing is affordable. They charge a monthly fee for unlimited submissions. If you're building a lot of links, this can be cheaper than per-link pricing. But if you're only building a few links per month, you might be paying for capacity you don't use. The downside is the indexing rate. Sixty-two percent is decent, but it means almost forty percent of your links are wasted. In competitive niches, that can be the difference between ranking and not ranking. Indexification is a solid choice if you want a proven backlink indexing tool with predictable results. Just don't expect miracles. ### 3. OneHourIndexing OneHourIndexing makes bold claims. Their name suggests links get indexed in one hour. That's not true. But they are faster than most competitors. The indexing rate is similar to Indexification. Out of 500 links, 298 got indexed. That's about 60%. The speed is where they shine. Most links get indexed within 5 to 10 days. Some in as little as 3 days. That's faster than Indexification, though not as fast as IndexChex. The interface is simple. Paste links, submit, done. They don't have as many features as Indexification. No drip feed. No tiered campaigns. Just basic link submission. The pricing is per link, similar to IndexChex. But their success rate is lower, so the cost per indexed link is higher. You're paying for speed, not efficiency. Dave, the affiliate guy in Portland, used OneHourIndexing for six months. "I liked the speed," he said. "But the success rate wasn't great. I switched to IndexChex and got better results for less money." The main selling point of OneHourIndexing is the speed. If you need a fast backlink indexer and don't care about the cost, they're a decent option. But for most people, IndexChex offers better value. One thing to note. OneHourIndexing had more links drop out of the index after a few months compared to other services. About 15% of indexed links disappeared within 90 days. That's frustrating. If speed is your top priority and you're willing to pay for it, OneHourIndexing is worth considering. But for most SEOs, there are better options. ### 4. Linklicious Linklicious takes a different approach. Instead of directly submitting links to Google, they use RSS feeds and pinging to get links discovered. It's a more indirect method, and the results reflect that. The indexing rate is lower than the top three. Out of 500 links, 241 got indexed. That's 48%. Not great, but not terrible either. The speed is variable. Some links get indexed in a week. Others take a month or more. The main advantage of Linklicious is the price. They're cheaper than most competitors. If you're on a tight budget, they might be worth considering. They also support tiered link building well. You can create RSS feeds for your tier 2 links and submit those. This indirect approach can help index tier 1 links without directly submitting them. The downside is the lower success rate. Less than half of your links get indexed. That means more than half of your link building effort is wasted. In competitive niches, that's a big problem. I found Linklicious worked better for certain types of links. Social bookmarks and web 2.0s indexed okay. PBN posts and guest posts didn't do as well. Your mileage may vary depending on your link sources. Linklicious is a decent budget option if you can't afford the more expensive services. Just go in with realistic expectations. You're getting what you pay for. ### 5. Backlinks Indexer Backlinks Indexer is a cloud-based service that uses multiple methods to get links indexed. They ping, they create RSS feeds, they submit to indexing services. The kitchen sink approach. The indexing rate is mediocre. Out of 500 links, 223 got indexed. That's 45%. Not impressive, but not the worst either. The speed is average. Most links take 2 to 4 weeks. The interface is decent. They have a dashboard where you can track your submissions and see which links got indexed. The reporting is better than some competitors. The pricing is monthly, like Indexification. Unlimited submissions for a flat fee. If you build a lot of links, this can be cost-effective. But with a 45% success rate, you're still wasting a lot of links. One thing I noticed. Backlinks Indexer seemed to work better for older links. Links that were a few weeks old had a higher indexing rate than brand new links. That's the opposite of what you want. They're not a bad service, but they're not a great one either. Middle of the pack in every way. If they were cheaper, they might be worth considering. But at their current price point, there are better options. ### 6. Instant Link Indexer Instant Link Indexer is the budget option. They're cheap, and you get what you pay for. The indexing rate is low. Out of 500 links, only 187 got indexed. That's 37%. Not good. The speed is okay. Links that do get indexed usually show up within 2 weeks. The interface is basic. Paste links, submit, wait. No fancy features. No reporting to speak of. You get an email when your campaign is done, and that's it. The pricing is the main selling point. They're the cheapest paid service I tested. If you have a very limited budget and something is better than nothing, they might be worth a shot. But honestly, with a 37% success rate, you're throwing away almost two-thirds of your links. In most cases, it makes more sense to save up for a better service. I can't recommend Instant Link Indexer for serious SEO work. Maybe for testing or for links you don't care about. But not for links you're paying good money to build. ### 7. GSA SEO Indexer GSA SEO Indexer is different from the other services on this list. It's desktop software, not a web service. You buy it once and use it forever. No monthly fees. The indexing rate is mediocre. Out of 500 links, 201 got indexed. That's 40%. Not great, but not terrible. The speed is slow. Most links take 3 to 6 weeks to get indexed. The advantage is the one-time cost. You pay once, and you can use this backlink indexing tool on unlimited links forever. If you build a lot of links over a long period, this can save you money compared to monthly services. The downside is the learning curve. The software has a million options and settings. It took me hours to figure out how to use it properly. And I'm pretty technical. If you're not tech-savvy, you'll struggle. You also need to run it on your own computer or server. That means leaving your computer on, dealing with crashes, managing updates. It's more hassle than a web-based service. GSA SEO Indexer makes sense for tech-savvy SEOs who build a lot of links and want to save money long-term. For everyone else, a web-based service is easier and often more effective. ### 8. PingFarm PingFarm is the free option. They have a paid tier, but the free version is what most people use. And honestly, you get what you pay for. The indexing rate is terrible. Out of 500 links, only 89 got indexed. That's 18%. Almost worthless. The speed doesn't matter when so few links get indexed. The interface is basic. You paste links, they get pinged. That's it. No tracking. No reporting. No way to know if anything worked. I can't recommend PingFarm for anything serious. Maybe for links you built for free and don't care about. But if you paid for links or spent time building them, use a real indexer. The only reason PingFarm is on this list is to warn you away from it. Don't waste your time. Don't waste your links. Use a proper backlink indexer service. ## Why Backlink Indexing Matters (More Than You Think) I need to talk about something that a lot of SEOs don't understand. Unindexed links are worthless. Completely worthless. They pass no authority. They help your rankings zero percent. You might as well have never built them. Think about it. Google can't rank what it doesn't know exists. If your link isn't in Google's index, it's like it doesn't exist. All the time and money you spent building it is wasted. I see this all the time. SEOs bragging about building 500 links. Then I check, and only 150 are indexed. They didn't build 500 links. They built 150. The other 350 are imaginary. This is why a good backlink indexer is essential. Not optional. Essential. If you're building links and not indexing them, you're leaving money on the table. A lot of money. The math is simple. Let's say you pay $100 for a PBN post. If it doesn't get indexed, you wasted $100. If you pay $2 to index it and it works, you spent $102 for a working link. That's a much better deal than $100 for nothing. Some SEOs argue that Google will eventually find and index links naturally. Maybe. But how long? Weeks? Months? Years? In competitive niches, you can't wait that long. You need links indexed now, not someday. Others say that if a link is good quality, Google will find it. That's partly true. Links from high-authority sites often get indexed quickly. But PBNs? Web 2.0s? Directory submissions? Google ignores most of them unless you push them into the index. The bottom line is this. If you're building links, you need to be indexing them. And you need to use a backlink indexing tool that actually works. Not all of them do. ## Frequently Asked Questions People ask me all the time if backlink indexers still work in 2026. The answer is yes, but with caveats. They don't work as well as they used to. Google's gotten smarter about ignoring artificial indexing signals. But they still work well enough to be worth using. A good backlink indexer can double or triple your indexing rate. That's a massive improvement. Just don't expect 100% indexing. Those days are gone. The question of whether indexing links can hurt your site comes up a lot. The short answer is no, not if you do it right. Using a reputable link indexer won't get you penalized. Google knows about these services. They don't care that you're trying to get your links indexed. What they care about is the quality of the links themselves. If you're building spammy links, you'll get penalized whether you index them or not. If you're building quality links, indexing them won't hurt you. People also want to know how long they should wait before using a backlink indexer. Some SEOs say to wait a few weeks and see if Google indexes links naturally. I disagree. Why wait? The sooner your links get indexed, the sooner they start helping your rankings. I submit links to an indexer within 24 hours of building them. Sometimes the same day. There's no benefit to waiting. The question of whether to index tier 2 links is interesting. Some SEOs say yes, because it helps index tier 1 links. Others say no, because it's a waste of money. My take? It depends. If you're building a complex tiered link structure, indexing tier 2 can help. But if you're just building a few tier 2 links per tier 1 link, it's probably not worth the cost. Focus your indexing budget on tier 1 links. Finally, people ask if they should use multiple indexers. I've tried this. I submitted the same links to multiple services to see if it improved indexing rates. The results were mixed. Sometimes it helped a little. Sometimes it made no difference. And it definitely doubled or tripled the cost. My recommendation? Pick one good backlink indexer and stick with it. Don't overcomplicate things. ## Conclusion Six years ago, I didn't know what a backlink indexer was. I built links and hoped Google would find them. Sometimes they did. Mostly they didn't. I was leaving money on the table and I didn't even know it. Today, I won't build a link without having a plan to get it indexed. It's that important. The difference between indexed and unindexed links is the difference between ranking and not ranking. Between profit and loss. Between success and failure. I've tested eight backlink indexing services. Some were great. Some were terrible. Most were somewhere in between. The best backlink indexer I found was IndexChex. Highest success rate. Fastest indexing. Best ROI. But the tool is only part of the equation. You still need to build quality links. Indexing spam won't help you. You need good links that deserve to be indexed. Then use a good indexer to make sure Google finds them. If you're serious about SEO, you need to take indexing seriously. Don't just build links and hope. Build links and index them. Track your results. Optimize your process. Treat indexing as a core part of your link building workflow, not an afterthought. That's what I learned from submitting 10,000 links and tracking every single one. Indexing matters. A lot. Don't ignore it. Now if you'll excuse me, I have 150 PBN posts that need to get indexed. Time to fire up IndexChex and get to work. Wish me luck.

    Import from clipboard

    Paste your markdown or webpage here...

    Advanced permission required

    Your current role can only read. Ask the system administrator to acquire write and comment permission.

    This team is disabled

    Sorry, this team is disabled. You can't edit this note.

    This note is locked

    Sorry, only owner can edit this note.

    Reach the limit

    Sorry, you've reached the max length this note can be.
    Please reduce the content or divide it to more notes, thank you!

    Import from Gist

    Import from Snippet

    or

    Export to Snippet

    Are you sure?

    Do you really want to delete this note?
    All users will lose their connection.

    Create a note from template

    Create a note from template

    Oops...
    This template has been removed or transferred.
    Upgrade
    All
    • All
    • Team
    No template.

    Create a template

    Upgrade

    Delete template

    Do you really want to delete this template?
    Turn this template into a regular note and keep its content, versions, and comments.

    This page need refresh

    You have an incompatible client version.
    Refresh to update.
    New version available!
    See releases notes here
    Refresh to enjoy new features.
    Your user state has changed.
    Refresh to load new user state.

    Sign in

    Forgot password
    or
    Sign in via Facebook Sign in via X(Twitter) Sign in via GitHub Sign in via Dropbox Sign in with Wallet
    Wallet ( )
    Connect another wallet

    New to HackMD? Sign up

    By signing in, you agree to our terms of service.

    Help

    • English
    • 中文
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • 日本語
    • Español
    • Català
    • Ελληνικά
    • Português
    • italiano
    • Türkçe
    • Русский
    • Nederlands
    • hrvatski jezik
    • język polski
    • Українська
    • हिन्दी
    • svenska
    • Esperanto
    • dansk

    Documents

    Help & Tutorial

    How to use Book mode

    Slide Example

    API Docs

    Edit in VSCode

    Install browser extension

    Contacts

    Feedback

    Discord

    Send us email

    Resources

    Releases

    Pricing

    Blog

    Policy

    Terms

    Privacy

    Cheatsheet

    Syntax Example Reference
    # Header Header 基本排版
    - Unordered List
    • Unordered List
    1. Ordered List
    1. Ordered List
    - [ ] Todo List
    • Todo List
    > Blockquote
    Blockquote
    **Bold font** Bold font
    *Italics font* Italics font
    ~~Strikethrough~~ Strikethrough
    19^th^ 19th
    H~2~O H2O
    ++Inserted text++ Inserted text
    ==Marked text== Marked text
    [link text](https:// "title") Link
    ![image alt](https:// "title") Image
    `Code` Code 在筆記中貼入程式碼
    ```javascript
    var i = 0;
    ```
    var i = 0;
    :smile: :smile: Emoji list
    {%youtube youtube_id %} Externals
    $L^aT_eX$ LaTeX
    :::info
    This is a alert area.
    :::

    This is a alert area.

    Versions and GitHub Sync
    Get Full History Access

    • Edit version name
    • Delete

    revision author avatar     named on  

    More Less

    Note content is identical to the latest version.
    Compare
      Choose a version
      No search result
      Version not found
    Sign in to link this note to GitHub
    Learn more
    This note is not linked with GitHub
     

    Feedback

    Submission failed, please try again

    Thanks for your support.

    On a scale of 0-10, how likely is it that you would recommend HackMD to your friends, family or business associates?

    Please give us some advice and help us improve HackMD.

     

    Thanks for your feedback

    Remove version name

    Do you want to remove this version name and description?

    Transfer ownership

    Transfer to
      Warning: is a public team. If you transfer note to this team, everyone on the web can find and read this note.

        Link with GitHub

        Please authorize HackMD on GitHub
        • Please sign in to GitHub and install the HackMD app on your GitHub repo.
        • HackMD links with GitHub through a GitHub App. You can choose which repo to install our App.
        Learn more  Sign in to GitHub

        Push the note to GitHub Push to GitHub Pull a file from GitHub

          Authorize again
         

        Choose which file to push to

        Select repo
        Refresh Authorize more repos
        Select branch
        Select file
        Select branch
        Choose version(s) to push
        • Save a new version and push
        • Choose from existing versions
        Include title and tags
        Available push count

        Pull from GitHub

         
        File from GitHub
        File from HackMD

        GitHub Link Settings

        File linked

        Linked by
        File path
        Last synced branch
        Available push count

        Danger Zone

        Unlink
        You will no longer receive notification when GitHub file changes after unlink.

        Syncing

        Push failed

        Push successfully