g0v Erichsen Plurality Gitcoin
===

0:04
my name is Leon and today I want to talk

0:07
about plurality at this um web 3 event
0:09
organized by government zero it's a privilege
0:12
to to be speaking here thanks so much
0:14
for the invitation Vivian and Noah I'm
0:17
pre-recording this session on October
0:20
13th uh and um I think I'll be there for
0:24
like live questions and answer session
0:27
right after this
0:28
recording will be displayed on October
0:30
21st so looking forward to connecting
0:32
with you all there
0:33
and basically the goal of this talk is
0:35
to kind of apply the plurality Paradigm
0:38
to web3 and git coin specifically and
0:41
and kind of show how
0:42
as it got zero Community member you you
0:45
could get involved
0:46
um
0:47
to kick us off I want to talk about some
0:49
of the like dominant ideologies of the
0:51
future
0:52
and see how plurality fits in there
0:55
um so I think one very dominant ideology
0:57
is kind of entrepreneurial
0:58
libertarianism or what you might also
1:00
call corporate libertarianism
1:02
and it's kind of this idea that at the
1:05
heart of of the future we'll have the
1:07
southern individual
1:08
um
1:09
and basically
1:12
um all other kind of sovereign forms of
1:14
like
1:15
um entities like States and whatsoever
1:19
will will kind of collapse is is part of
1:22
that ideology and all that will be left
1:24
is kind of seven individuals and they
1:25
are like keys to to their Bitcoins and
1:28
now they're like highly financialized
1:29
Technologies and if there's cooperation
1:31
it will kind of happen in this highly
1:33
financialized sense
1:35
right now you pay something and you get
1:36
something
1:37
and um basically it's um Peter Thiel is
1:41
like one big advocate of kind of this
1:42
Southern individual uh prophecy
1:45
um another big kind of
1:47
ideology in the technology space is
1:50
synthetic technocracy
1:52
um the idea here is that we'll basically
1:54
have this like
1:56
super intelligent
1:58
um machine
2:00
technocratic Elite that'll kind of make
2:03
all kinds of decisions
2:05
um
2:06
from the top down uh like basically
2:10
could either ruin or save Humanity
2:13
by then coming up with like supposedly
2:16
like very innovative solutions to
2:18
complex problems and basically a very
2:21
small team of Engineers will be you know
2:24
leading and like working on the super
2:26
intelligent machine and the Machine will
2:29
kind of rule the world
2:30
um which might be the end or the
2:32
beginning but I also think that is not
2:35
very compelling because I think a like
2:38
they're like
2:40
artificial or like General artificial
2:42
intelligence like that super intelligent
2:44
agent is more so an ideology than in
2:47
technology and place at the same time I
2:49
don't think it's very desirable because
2:51
like it it will inevitably be difficult
2:53
to kind of align its interests with like
2:55
broad humanity and then make it very
2:58
accountable on like how that like super
3:00
intelligent complex machine makes
3:01
decisions
3:03
um
3:04
what I'm much more compelled and like
3:06
passionate about is like this vision of
3:08
plural democracy and and obviously like
3:10
Taiwan is a great example of plural
3:12
democracy in action you know the all the
3:15
work of like the digital minutes like
3:17
the Ministry of digital Affairs the work
3:21
of Audrey Tang golf zero V Taiwan which
3:26
applied polis for example this like
3:28
technology that basically tries to
3:30
identify opinion clusters in in
3:33
deliberation and then identify the
3:35
proposals that have supported across
3:36
different groups
3:38
and radical exchange with all its cool
3:41
ideas like quadratic funding and
3:42
quadratic voting or like plural
3:44
ownership and all kinds of other things
3:47
and I think
3:48
basically the idea is that we can use
3:51
technology to make democracy stronger
3:54
and um I think one good vision of like
3:56
how this world might look like for
3:58
example is
3:59
Star Trek and you know like how you know
4:03
all these different species across
4:04
different planets and Star Trek
4:06
cooperate uh with each other through um
4:09
digital technology
4:12
um
4:14
Bitcoin also fits into this uh cluster I
4:18
think so so I want to talk a little bit
4:20
about like how how VidCon
4:23
Works towards pro-democracy and what
4:25
we're doing and basically the main
4:26
product that you might know from Bitcoin
4:29
and like main product that we're working
4:32
on is called VidCon grants and Bitcoin
4:34
grants
4:35
is pro is a platform uh for quadratic
4:38
funding so basically we
4:40
we fund
4:42
um quadratically
4:43
um
4:44
open source project primarily and the
4:46
way it works is that we have some
4:47
matching partners for example like the
4:49
ethereum foundation who put up matching
4:51
pools or funding and then you have
4:53
different projects in say the ethereum
4:55
community community members make
4:57
donations to these projects and then
4:59
these matching pools match these
5:00
donations from the community with their
5:03
dollars and the Twist and quadratic
5:06
funding has said like the green areas
5:08
here are for example they're like
5:10
donations to one such project
5:13
so you basically look at the donations
5:16
that came from different people to that
5:18
project so there's a donation of Alice
5:19
donation of Bob donation of Charlie
5:22
and and then you take the square root of
5:25
these donations
5:27
so you take the sum of the square square
5:30
roots
5:31
and then you take the square of the sum
5:33
of the square roots which gives you this
5:35
square and then this yellow area the
5:37
difference between
5:39
the size of the square and um
5:42
the initial contributions is basically
5:44
the matching that the matching proof
5:45
will provide what you can see now is
5:48
that like
5:49
um smaller contributions have
5:51
proportionately more weight than larger
5:52
ones and basically many small
5:54
contributions
5:56
might you know yield way more matching
5:59
funding than one large one so basically
6:01
what we do is like we incentivize people
6:04
to even donate small amounts
6:06
um which sometimes you know might seem
6:07
redundant to donate one dollar but in
6:09
this system you know like by adding one
6:11
dollar you'll get like all this new
6:13
matching funding to the project that you
6:15
like
6:16
and on in turn
6:18
um the matching funder knows that it
6:20
kind of really harnesses a lot of
6:22
collective intelligence because it
6:24
allows people to show people like to
6:26
show how much a value given public could
6:30
um while also making it like more
6:32
expensive to like
6:34
um you know like
6:36
like scream into the room and say I
6:38
really want this like only this one
6:40
public good because you have
6:41
proportionally growing costs like to to
6:43
get more influence in the decision
6:46
and and this is like literally how the
6:48
math works so in like capitalism you
6:50
know you can if you value a given public
6:52
good that much and if you have the
6:54
capital you can basically buy as much
6:55
influence as you need to make that
6:57
happen
6:58
in like one in one person one more
7:00
democracies which are pretty prominent
7:02
you can only say like I want this good
7:03
or you don't want it no matter how much
7:05
you care about it and about in quadratic
7:07
voting basically the first unit of
7:09
influence
7:10
like the first vote costs um you know
7:13
the square root of one is one two votes
7:16
costs four credits
7:17
um three votes cost nine credits and so
7:19
forth so basically
7:22
um
7:22
the the cost for additional units of
7:25
influence are growing proportionally
7:27
which is like this very elegant way to
7:30
kind of create this proportional cost
7:32
function for the participants in like
7:34
evaluating like how much they value
7:37
Goods so people really deeply think
7:39
about how much they value the goods then
7:41
signal them as a matching pool partner
7:43
you really get to to harness that full
7:44
collective intelligence
7:46
uh but there's obviously one problem to
7:48
like
7:49
this type of a paradigm so for example
7:51
you might just set up like a bunch of
7:54
um
7:55
identities like robots on like um
7:58
ethereum basically or like fake accounts
8:01
and donate to the projects that you like
8:03
and donate donate donate and this way
8:05
you can get a bunch of matching funding
8:07
to your project which isn't the idea
8:09
obviously obviously we want every
8:11
participant to only have one account in
8:12
the system but even if we get that
8:16
quadratic funding as an economic model
8:18
in its raw form like lies on the
8:21
assumption that we are Homo economically
8:24
so like we we kind of assume that people
8:27
make rational decisions and like really
8:30
deeply think about what they
8:31
individually care about
8:33
and um it's kind of a deeper problem of
8:36
Economics generally that like I know
8:38
some of you might have been to like
8:39
economics classes or like rad economic
8:41
theory but basically this homo
8:43
economicus is this assumption that
8:45
people are like
8:47
isolated from each other so only care
8:49
about themselves are like able to
8:51
perfectly quantify what they think so
8:54
they are like super rational and
8:55
isolated but I don't think that's true
8:57
you know the reality is somewhere in
8:59
between here you know participants in
9:01
like Bitcoin grants will likely have a
9:04
family you know so you probably care
9:06
about your family and if your family
9:07
would have a project on gitong grants or
9:09
some other quadratic funding program
9:11
you'd probably just support your family
9:13
members or friends of your family
9:15
members or you know like friends of
9:17
yours and if you're on Taipei
9:20
and Basin Taipei you probably like it
9:22
right so you will more likely support
9:24
the you know quadratic funding project
9:27
and type A say to fix the streets
9:30
then in some other
9:32
um
9:33
city in the world and more likely like
9:35
or like similar like if you are in like
9:38
Basin in
9:40
in Taipei and you're on the golf zero
9:42
movement you are more likely you know
9:44
very likely to support some like golf
9:46
zero project and maybe you work for the
9:48
ethereum foundation so you will maybe
9:50
you know more likely support ethereum
9:52
projects and like polygon projects and
9:54
if you are a Taiwanese you
9:56
I'm very likely you know support
9:58
Taiwanese projects and not projects I
10:00
know from America or Germany as much as
10:03
you would support project-based in
10:04
Taiwan
10:05
so um
10:07
yeah basically we are not homo
10:12
economically
10:13
and
10:15
you know we shouldn't obviously be able
10:17
to like set up all these kind of fake
10:19
accounts so the question is how do we
10:21
adjust quadratic funding to to cope with
10:24
this social reality to account and
10:27
recognize all these groups that people
10:28
are part of
10:29
and then actually Foster cooperation
10:32
across different groups and not just
10:34
individuals so basically quadratic
10:37
funding in its raw form is kind of the
10:39
singular coordination device for
10:41
cooperation between isolated individuals
10:43
between these like homo economic key
10:46
but um
10:48
in fact take for example you know
10:50
Beyonce and Jay-Z you know
10:53
this would be like the normal quadratic
10:55
funding route right where it would take
10:57
the square root of Jay-Z's contribution
10:58
and the script of Beyonce's contribution
11:02
um and square that but in fact you know
11:04
they they are a family they work in the
11:07
same industry they even do like music
11:09
together they live in the same country
11:11
so maybe we do something like this where
11:13
we put Jay-Z and Beyonce
11:16
um who obviously care about each other
11:17
into the same square root
11:19
and um
11:21
you know applying this to bitcoin you
11:23
know similarly like we have all these
11:25
type of ecosystems in in the open source
11:28
community and in the web 3 community so
11:30
people in the ipfs community will like
11:31
the you know more likely donate to ipfs
11:34
projects and like
11:36
between the ethereum community ethereum
11:38
projects but obviously they also
11:39
overlaps right so they're people who
11:42
both care about ipfs and ethereum and
11:45
like
11:45
you know all kinds of things so
11:47
basically we need like
11:49
different versions of quadratic funding
11:51
or these coordination devices
11:53
build for like inter-group cooperation
11:56
so we basically not just want to
11:58
identify okay like the open like the
12:00
ipfs community is maybe large the
12:02
largest so not just um build quadratic
12:05
funding you know where like the largest
12:07
groups wins
12:08
but actually also factor in and
12:12
increasingly you know
12:14
reward social cultural diversity so like
12:17
if a project receives
12:19
um donations from like different social
12:21
groups we want to reward that somehow
12:24
and um
12:25
actually we we could do this right so
12:28
you might have heard of this concept
12:30
like um sobone token so basically what
12:32
we could do is like
12:34
we could issue Alice and Bob on the
12:36
ethereum blockchain like proofs like
12:38
cryptographic tokens
12:40
based on some Behavior you know like if
12:42
you say donated to a ethereum project in
12:45
the past you get an ethereum batch and
12:47
if you've done it to a climate project
12:48
in the past you get a climate token if
12:51
you've donated to UNI stop you get uni
12:53
sub token then we do the same for Bob
12:54
and everybody else
12:56
and now what we can actually do is
12:58
we can
13:00
um you know for example if we see here
13:02
that like
13:03
Bob and Alice are like highly you know
13:07
share many of these tokens we could
13:09
basically remove the the impact of their
13:13
pairwise match and and you know they are
13:16
like
13:17
all kinds of mathematical ways in which
13:19
we could could adjust to quadratic
13:21
funding formula that way or like we
13:23
could we could kind of look at okay
13:25
we have like group X and group y you
13:28
know group X is like Alice Bob and
13:30
Charlie and this group is like Alice and
13:32
Bob and we could basically say Okay sins
13:34
like Alice is in both of these groups
13:37
will kind of ignore Alice's impact and
13:39
only consider
13:41
say like um Bob and Charlie who are like
13:44
in this
13:45
who are like different
13:47
um people in these different groups only
13:50
look at the unique group members when we
13:52
compare the the matching that two groups
13:55
get through their cooperation
13:57
and there are all kinds of these models
14:00
that we need to kind of develop to
14:02
really get to this vision of like
14:05
building plural coordination devices
14:08
um for Intergroup cooperation instead of
14:10
this like
14:11
weird assumption where we like ignore
14:14
all of these relationships and kind of
14:16
suppose we are all
14:17
isolated from each other like homo
14:20
economically but it's much more likely
14:22
some something in between right well
14:25
like we are not exactly the same you
14:27
know like one agent setting up fake
14:29
accounts and then only promoting his own
14:30
project and we're probably not um
14:33
isolated but it's like kind of something
14:36
in between and and the goal with these
14:37
formulas here is that we can kind of
14:40
account for this and even
14:42
algorithmically you know have this
14:44
social graph and then adjust the
14:46
quadratic farming formula a little bit
14:48
to like kind of uh mute you know
14:52
cooperation across people
14:55
who
14:56
who share interests naturally or across
14:58
groups
15:00
um that that have many shared members
15:01
and
15:03
another model is like offset quadratic
15:05
funding and I'll later share some
15:07
resources where you can dig into some of
15:08
these models but basically there are
15:11
like a bunch of open questions so one
15:13
are like one is like what is this like
15:16
perfect or like what is a good model
15:18
that works across different contexts
15:20
to you know
15:22
recognize these like social graphs
15:26
and then feeding the social graph into
15:28
the quadratic funding formula so we
15:31
um kind of set the incentives right to
15:33
fast undergroup Corporation
15:35
and then the question is is there like
15:37
one model that might work across
15:39
different contexts are there variables
15:41
like say
15:42
you know the country you're from or like
15:46
the open source projects you support or
15:47
like you have Twitter followers or
15:49
Facebook followers that would be
15:51
relevant across all the different
15:52
contexts you know for example if you do
15:55
quadratic funding for music
15:57
probably a music taste is very relevant
15:59
right to the quadratic funding
16:01
Intergroup Corporation model but if you
16:04
do quadratic funding for open source
16:05
software
16:06
your GitHub activity and like software
16:09
stuff seems to be much more relevant
16:12
similarly the question is on what
16:14
technology substrate do we run these
16:16
operations
16:17
so should we run this on ethereum
16:20
um where do we store the social graph
16:22
like a project that I'm working on with
16:24
gitcoin is a gitcon passport where we
16:26
basically try to
16:28
enable people to grow personal address
16:31
containing all kinds of credentials
16:33
about themselves like
16:35
you know how many followers they have
16:36
and eventually like who their followers
16:38
are and like what projects they have
16:41
contributed to on GitHub and Etc or
16:43
should we store this on ipfs I think
16:44
there's likely not going to be like one
16:47
answer for all the communities right
16:48
probably like web 3 communities and
16:50
Bitcoin
16:51
will work with like Technologies like
16:54
ipfs or ethereum but maybe if you're
16:56
like a governmental organization you
16:58
might prefer to to self-host it on like
17:00
a secure database that you're managing
17:03
and you know if you're a firm say a
17:06
corporation you'll probably might you
17:08
know use a theorem but you might also
17:10
sell first or like do it on Amazon web
17:12
servers or whatever
17:13
and similarly
17:15
as you see like I mean already
17:17
explaining quadratic voting is not um
17:19
you know the easiest though I think like
17:22
once you've tried it once you know you
17:24
kind of get quadratic voting or like
17:27
looked at these shots and whatsoever but
17:29
um if we really want to scale This and
17:31
like imagine the future or like we
17:34
really deploy these like quadratic
17:37
funding plural quadratic funding models
17:38
like with this vast social graphs where
17:40
we're not just consider
17:42
you know Geographic diversity but we
17:44
also consider you know um
17:47
um you know your activity online and
17:50
other like groups that you're part of
17:52
and you participate in these like voting
17:54
and funding processes around the globe
17:57
like a we need to kind of paint pictures
18:00
or like tell stories around how this
18:02
world might look like and then help
18:04
people who who should use these systems
18:06
right to understand them because it's
18:09
it's obviously weird if you don't really
18:11
understand like how the voting mechanism
18:13
works that you're using so I think
18:15
they're like you know mechanism design
18:17
questions technological questions also
18:19
like the complexity of these operations
18:21
you know kind of grow exponentially the
18:23
more
18:24
Dimensions you add to the social graph
18:26
and like variables through the quadratic
18:28
funding formula really
18:30
makes the compute more expensive and
18:33
then really just explaining the stuff to
18:35
to the communities that use it and like
18:37
inspiring people to work on it
18:39
um so basically
18:41
um you know it's kind of time to hack
18:43
and then like build some prototypes and
18:46
experiment with this stuff so I think
18:49
one big area to work on is obviously
18:51
like the social graph um
18:53
work obviously there are like a bunch of
18:55
social graphs out there thing Facebook
18:58
thing Twitter I think um Reddit you know
19:01
they all have apis that allow you to
19:04
kind of sauce groups that people are
19:07
part of whatsoever
19:10
and um
19:12
you know one is kind of mapping out
19:14
these social graphs
19:16
and then feeding these social graphs
19:18
into like
19:19
crowdfunding projects like it congrants
19:21
or this project here from golf zero for
19:24
example
19:25
to kind of make the the matching more
19:27
pluralistic for example or another idea
19:29
might be
19:31
you know could kind of look uh integrate
19:33
these type of Technologies into
19:34
productivity software like Slack
19:36
so you know consider building like a
19:39
slag board for the golf zeros like
19:41
community
19:42
they would consider and what channels
19:44
for example you are active or like what
19:47
you know channels you're a part of
19:49
and then Foster like you could have
19:51
these ports like okay when like what
19:54
should be the
19:55
the headline of the next golf zero event
19:57
for example right you pull up that pool
20:01
like this survey like and then people
20:03
participate in this poll and in so doing
20:05
they can vote quadratically but you
20:07
would also
20:08
like um consider like the social graph
20:11
that we get from slack in terms of like
20:13
are these all the people that you know
20:15
work in the Taipei chapter of
20:18
um gov zero who are supporting this or
20:20
are these actually people from different
20:21
cities or like different channels I'm
20:24
not sure particularly what the like
20:25
Channel structure for example in golf
20:27
zeros
20:28
and um one toolkit that might be useful
20:31
for you all in doing this is like um
20:33
what we call Grants 2.0 so good congrats
20:36
previously ran on like a web 2.5
20:39
application basically where it's like
20:41
basically this Django app that mostly
20:44
like reads the donations from the
20:46
blockchain and then did the matching
20:49
calculations and everything kind of off
20:51
the chain on like normal Computing
20:53
infrastructure
20:54
and now we are building something called
20:56
grants 2.0 we're basically build out
20:59
like a like open source uh social graph
21:03
called the like kitcon passport which I
21:05
mentioned earlier where people can kind
21:07
of collect these credentials about
21:08
themselves
21:09
and like a project Hub where you know
21:11
like different projects like open source
21:12
projects like of zero can present
21:14
themselves hey we do a b c and Y
21:16
and then you can as a developer choose
21:19
from these different plural quadratic
21:21
funding and voting models so you
21:23
basically Plug and Play hopefully like
21:25
in a matter of like minutes or hours
21:27
deploy your independent quadratic
21:29
funding program like your for example
21:31
think about like a golf zero quadratic
21:33
funding program you get some matching
21:36
fund from like a supporter and then you
21:38
say we want to fund gov zero projects so
21:40
gov zero project sign up
21:42
and then you you know set the projects
21:46
that you want to accept
21:48
and then decide what identities can
21:50
participate decide what variables you
21:53
know what social cultural markers you
21:55
want to consider
21:56
and then hit deploy run the quadratic
21:59
funding program and disperse some
22:02
matching based on
22:03
you know the plural quadratic funding
22:05
Logic for like rewarding the projects
22:08
that have many donations many and large
22:10
Nations but also
22:12
um diverse groups of supporters
22:14
and if you want to dig deeper into into
22:16
this work
22:18
obviously everything on the radical
22:20
Exchange blog is amazing I really
22:22
recommend this video um by Joelle Miller
22:24
uh also I like borrowed a bunch of the
22:27
visuals from Joel actually like you'll
22:30
find it on YouTube it's like called
22:31
kuduri funny pluralist economics with
22:33
Joel Miller public goods call
22:36
way walks in more detail
22:38
into like these different plural
22:41
versions of quadratic voting and funding
22:43
uh the decentralized society paper
22:45
finding what three soul
22:47
kind of applies plurality Paradigm more
22:50
holistically
22:53
to to web3
22:55
and then I wrote this post on the gitcon
22:58
governance form gov.gidcon.com
23:01
tokens Can Make It congruent more
23:03
pluralistic
23:04
which is kind of um closer to this talk
23:07
and was published before Joelle
23:09
presented all these cool like much more
23:11
cooler models and the one that I
23:13
presented here
23:15
um so yeah but but these are kind of
23:17
good resources to kind of dig deep into
23:19
this work
23:20
Audrey tang and lenweil will publish a
23:22
book on plurality uh sometime later next
23:26
year it's actually going to be um
23:28
uh kind of written in a git-like
23:31
structure so you can even make proposed
23:33
changes to the book and vote on them or
23:36
also using like prokaryotic voting and
23:39
similar stuff so
23:40
um check out this post on the radical
23:42
Exchange blog it's also available in all
23:44
kinds of languages and
23:46
also looking for translators of the book
23:48
but this might really help kinda to to
23:51
build like a like cohesive background
23:54
resource for anyone interested in
23:56
plurality in the future and applying not
23:58
just to web 3 but all kinds of forms if
24:00
we're gonna like technology and
24:01
organization
24:03
um thank you so much for having me
24:05
um it was a pleasure to to be here reach
24:07
out to me if you have any questions
24:09
wanna work uh with good coin on your
24:13
like own quadratic voting or funding
24:15
platform using our open source toolkit
24:17
called git congrants
24:19
gigcon passport is already live and we
24:21
have a SDK that you can source so so
24:25
just go to passport.clickon.co to find
24:27
out more
24:28
thank you so much for thriving me and um
24:32
yeah see you see you on October 21st

### 中文
0:04
我的名字是萊昂，今天我想談談
0:07
關於這個 um web 3 活動中的複數
0:09
由零政府組織，這是一種特權
0:12
能在這裡發言非常感謝
0:14
為了邀請 Vivian 和 Noah 我是
0:17
10 月預錄本次會議
0:20
13th uh and um I think I'll be there for
0:24
喜歡現場問答環節
0:27
在這之後
0:28
錄音將於 10 月上映
0:30
21 號所以期待連接
0:32
和你們一起
0:33
基本上這個演講的目標是
0:35
應用複數範式
0:38
專門針對 web3 和 git coin 和
0:41
並展示如何
0:42
因為它有零社區成員你你
0:45
可以參與
0:46
嗯
0:47
讓我們離開我想談談一些
0:49
類似的主流意識形態
0:51
未來
0:52
看看多元化如何適應那裡
0:55
嗯，所以我認為一種非常占主導地位的意識形態
0:57
有點創業精神
0:58
自由主義或你也可能
1:00
稱企業自由主義
1:02
就是這樣的想法
1:05
未來的心臟，我們將擁有
1:07
南方人
1:08
嗯
1:09
基本上
1:12
嗯所有其他種類的主權形式
1:14
喜歡
1:15
像國家這樣的實體和任何東西
1:19
will will kind 崩潰 is is part of
1:22
這種意識形態和所有將留下的東西
1:24
是七個人，他們
1:25
就像他們的比特幣的鑰匙和
1:28
現在他們就像高度金融化
1:29
技術以及是否有合作
1:31
它會發生在這個高度
1:33
金融化意義
1:35
現在你支付一些東西，你得到
1:36
某物
1:37
嗯，基本上是 嗯，彼得泰爾是
1:41
像這樣的一位大倡導者
1:42
南方個人呃預言
1:45
嗯另一種大的
1:47
技術領域的意識形態是
1:50
綜合技術官僚
1:52
嗯，這裡的想法是我們基本上會
1:54
有這個像
1:56
超級聰明
1:58
嗯機器
2:00
技術專家精英
2:03
各種決定
2:05
嗯
2:06
從上到下，呃基本上像
2:10
可以毀滅或拯救人類
2:13
到那時想出像​​據說
2:16
喜歡非常創新的解決方案
2:18
複雜的問題，基本上是一個非常
2:21
小工程師團隊你會知道的
2:24
領導並喜歡在超級工作
2:26
智能機器和機器將
2:29
一種統治世界
2:30
嗯，這可能是結束或
2:32
開始，但我也認為那不是
2:35
非常引人注目，因為我認為喜歡
2:38
他們就像
2:40
人工或類似一般人工
2:42
像那樣的智能 超級智能
2:44
代理人更像是一種意識形態，而不是
2:47
技術和地點同時我
2:49
不要認為這是非常可取的，因為
2:51
喜歡就難免難
2:53
使其利益與類似
2:55
廣泛的人性，然後使它非常
2:58
像超級一樣負責
3:00
智能複合機製造
3:01
決定
3:03
嗯
3:04
我更被迫和喜歡的東西
3:06
充滿激情的就像這樣的願景
3:08
多元民主和顯然喜歡
3:10
台灣是複數的一個很好的例子
3:12
民主在行動，你知道一切
3:15
像數字會議記錄一樣的工作
3:17
數字事務部的工作
3:21
唐嫣高爾夫零V台灣哪
3:26
應用城邦例如這樣
3:28
基本上試圖
3:30
識別意見集群
3:33
審議，然後確定
3:35
支持的提案
3:36
不同的群體
3:38
和酷酷的徹底交流
3:41
二次融資等想法
3:42
二次投票或類似複數
3:44
所有權和其他各種東西
3:47
我認為
3:48
基本上這個想法是我們可以使用
3:51
使民主更強大的技術
3:54
嗯，我認為像這樣的一個很好的願景
3:56
這個世界的樣子
3:58
例子是
3:59
星際迷航，你知道的就像你知道的一樣
4:03
所有這些不同的物種
4:04
不同的行星和星際迷航
4:06
通過 um 互相合作
4:09
數字技術
4:12
嗯
4:14
比特幣也適合這個呃集群我
4:18
這麼想所以我想談談
4:20
關於 VidCon 怎麼樣
4:23
致力於民主和什麼
4:25
我們正在做，基本上是主要的
4:26
你可能從比特幣中知道的產品
4:29
和我們正在開發的主要產品一樣
4:32
on 被稱為 VidCon 贈款和比特幣
4:34
贈款
4:35
是 pro 是一個平台 uh for quadratic
4:38
資金所以基本上我們
4:40
我們資助
4:42
嗯二次元
4:43
嗯
4:44
開源項目主要和
4:46
它的工作方式是我們有一些
4:47
匹配的合作夥伴，例如
4:49
提供匹配的以太坊基金會
4:51
池或資金，然後你有
4:53
說以太坊的不同項目
4:55
社區社區成員使
4:57
捐贈給這些項目，然後
4:59
這些匹配的池匹配這些
5:00
來自社區的捐款和他們的
5:03
美元和扭曲和二次
5:06
資金就像綠地一樣
5:08
例如，他們就像
5:10
向一個這樣的項目捐款
5:13
所以你基本上看的是捐款
5:16
來自不同的人
5:18
項目所以有愛麗絲的捐贈
5:19
鮑勃的捐贈 查理的捐贈
5:22
然後你取平方根
5:25
這些捐款
5:27
所以你取平方和
5:30
根
5:31
然後你取總和的平方
5:33
的平方根給你這個
5:35
正方形，然後這個黃色區域
5:37
之間的區別
5:39
正方形的大小和嗯
5:42
最初的貢獻基本上是
5:44
匹配證明的匹配
5:45
將提供您現在可以看到的是
5:48
好像
5:49
嗯，較小的貢獻有
5:51
重量比更大的比例更大
5:52
一個，基本上很多小
5:54
貢獻
5:56
你知道讓路更匹配嗎
5:59
基本上比一大筆資金
6:01
我們所做的就像我們激勵人們
6:04
甚至捐贈少量
6:06
嗯，有時你知道這似乎
6:07
多餘的捐贈一美元，但在
6:09
這個你知道的系統喜歡添加一個
6:11
美元你會得到像所有這些新的
6:13
將資金與您的項目相匹配
6:15
喜歡
6:16
然後依次開啟
6:18
嗯，匹配的資助者知道它
6:20
真的利用了很多
6:22
集體智慧，因為它
6:24
允許人們展示人們喜歡
6:26
顯示給定公眾的價值有多大
6:30
嗯，同時也讓它更喜歡
6:32
喜歡昂貴
6:34
嗯，你知道喜歡
6:36
就像尖叫到房間裡說我
6:38
真的想要這個像只有這個
6:40
公共利益，因為你有
6:41
按比例增長的成本喜歡
6:43
在決策中獲得更大的影響力
6:46
這就像字面意思
6:48
數學就像資本主義一樣運作，你
6:50
如果你重視給定的公眾，你知道你可以
6:52
很好，如果你有
6:54
您基本上可以購買盡可能多的資金
6:55
影響，因為你需要做到這一點
6:57
發生
6:58
像一個人一個人又一個人
7:00
相當突出的民主國家
7:02
你只能說我想要這個好
7:03
或者無論如何你都不想要它
7:05
你關心它並且在二次方中關心它
7:07
投票基本上是第一單元
7:09
影響
7:10
就像第一次投​​票一樣，你知道的
7:13
一的平方根是一二票
7:16
花費四個學分
7:17
嗯，三張選票花了九個學分等等
7:19
基本上是這樣
7:22
嗯
7:22
額外單位的成本
7:25
影響力成比例增長
7:27
這就像這種非常優雅的方式
7:30
創造這種比例成本
7:32
參與者的功能喜歡
7:34
評估他們的價值
7:37
貨真讓人深思
7:39
關於他們當時對商品的估價
7:41
向他們發出匹配池合作夥伴的信號
7:43
你真的可以充分利用
7:44
集體智慧
7:46
呃，但顯然有一個問題
7:48
喜歡
7:49
這種類型的範例，例如
7:51
你可能只是像一堆
7:54
嗯
7:55
像機器人一樣的身份，就像嗯
7:58
以太坊基本上或喜歡假賬戶
8:01
並捐贈給你喜歡的項目
8:03
並捐贈 捐贈 捐贈 就這樣
8:05
你可以獲得一堆匹配的資金
8:07
到你的項目，這不是想法
8:09
顯然我們想要每個
8:11
參與者只有一個帳戶
8:12
系統，但即使我們得到了
8:16
二次融資作為一種經濟模型
8:18
像謊言一樣的原始形式
8:21
假設我們是經濟上的人類
8:24
所以就像我們一樣，我們假設人們
8:27
做出理性的決定，真的喜歡
8:30
深入思考他們的
8:31
個人關心
8:33
嗯，這是一個更深層次的問題
8:36
我所知道的一般經濟學
8:38
你們中的一些人可能喜歡
8:39
經濟學課程或類似rad經濟的
8:41
理論，但基本上這個同性戀
8:43
經濟是這個假設
8:45
人們就像
8:47
彼此隔離所以只關心
8:49
關於自己都喜歡
8:51
完美量化他們的想法
8:54
他們就像超級理性和
8:55
孤立，但我認為這不是真的
8:57
你知道現實在某處
8:59
在這裡你知道參與者
9:01
像比特幣贈款可能會有
9:04
你認識的家人，所以你可能在乎
9:06
關於你的家人，如果你的家人
9:07
會有一個關於 gitong 贈款的項目或
9:09
其他一些二次融資計劃
9:11
你可能只會養家糊口
9:13
您的家人或朋友
9:15
會員或你認識的朋友
9:17
你的，如果你在台北
9:20
和盆地台北你可能喜歡它
9:22
對，所以你更有可能支持
9:24
你知道二次融資項目
9:27
然後輸入 A 說修復街道
9:30
然後在其他一些
9:32
嗯
9:33
世界上的城市，更有可能喜歡
9:35
或喜歡類似的，如果你喜歡
9:38
盆地在
9:40
在台北，你在打零高爾夫
9:42
你更可能知道的運動
9:44
很可能會支持一些像高爾夫這樣的人
9:46
零項目，也許你為
9:48
以太坊基金會，所以你可能會
9:50
你知道更有可能支持以太坊
9:52
項目和像多邊形項目和
9:54
如果你是台灣人
9:56
我很可能你知道支持
9:58
台灣項目而不是項目 I
10:00
從美國或德國知道的一樣多
10:03
你會支持基於項目的
10:04
台灣
10:05
所以嗯
10:07
是的，基本上我們不是同性戀
10:12
經濟上
10:13
和
10:15
你知道我們顯然不應該能夠
10:17
喜歡設置所有這些假的
10:19
帳戶所以問題是我們如何
10:21
調整二次資金以應對
10:24
這個社會現實要考慮和
10:27
認識所有這些群體，人們
10:28
是一部分
10:29
然後實際上促進合作
10:32
跨越不同的群體，而不僅僅是
10:34
個人基本上是二次的
10:37
原始形式的資金是一種
10:39
奇異協調裝置
10:41
孤立個體之間的合作
10:43
在這些之間，就像人類經濟鑰匙
10:46
但是嗯
10:48
其實以你知道的為例
10:50
你知道的碧昂絲和傑伊-Z
10:53
這就像正常的二次方
10:55
資金路線就在需要的地方
10:57
Jay-Z 貢獻的平方根
10:58
和碧昂絲貢獻的劇本
11:02
嗯，平方，但事實上你知道
11:04
他們是他們工作的家庭
11:07
他們甚至喜歡音樂的同行業
11:09
他們一起住在同一個國家
11:11
所以也許我們在哪裡做這樣的事情
11:13
我們把 Jay-Z 和 Beyonce
11:16
嗯，明明互相關心的
11:17
成同一個平方根
11:19
和嗯
11:21
你知道把它應用到比特幣上你
11:23
同樣知道我們擁有所有這些
11:25
開源中的生態系統類型
11:28
社區和 web 3 社區，所以
11:30
ipfs 社區的人會喜歡
11:31
你知道的更有可能捐贈給 ipfs
11:34
項目之類的
11:36
以太坊社區之間的以太坊
11:38
項目，但顯然他們也
11:39
重疊的權利，所以他們是那些
11:42
都關心 ipfs 和以太坊
11:45
喜歡
11:45
你什麼都知道
11:47
基本上我們需要像
11:49
不同版本的二次融資
11:51
或這些協調裝置
11:53
建立類似的集團間合作
11:56
所以我們基本上不只是想
11:58
確定好像公開一樣
12:00
ipfs 社區可能很大
12:02
最大，所以不只是 um 建立二次方
12:05
資金你知道哪裡像最大的
12:07
小組獲勝
12:08
但實際上也考慮和
12:12
你越來越知道
12:14
獎勵社會文化多樣性
12:17
如果一個項目收到
12:19
嗯，來自不同社會的捐款
12:21
我們想以某種方式獎勵的團體
12:24
和嗯
12:25
實際上我們可以這樣做
12:28
你可能聽說過這個概念
12:30
就像 um sobone 令牌，所以基本上是什麼
12:32
我們能做的就是
12:34
我們可以在
12:36
以太坊區塊鏈之類的證明
12:38
加密令牌
12:40
基於您知道的一些行為，例如
12:42
你說捐贈給以太坊項目
12:45
過去你得到一個以太坊批次和
12:47
如果你為氣候項目做過
12:48
在過去，如果
12:51
你已經捐贈給 UNI 停止你得到 uni
12:53
sub token 然後我們對 Bob 做同樣的事情
12:54
和其他人
12:56
現在我們實際上可以做的是
12:58
我們可以
13:00
嗯，例如，如果我們在這裡看到
13:02
好像
13:03
鮑勃和愛麗絲就像你知道的那樣
13:07
分享我們可以分享的許多代幣
13:09
基本消除了他們的影響
13:13
成對匹配，你知道他們是
13:16
喜歡
13:17
各種數學方法
13:19
我們可以調整為二次方
13:21
以這種方式或像我們一樣的資金公式
13:23
我們可以看看好嗎
13:25
我們有 X 組和 Y 組你
13:28
知道 X 組就像 Alice Bob 和
13:30
查理和這個小組就像愛麗絲和
13:32
鮑勃和我們基本上可以說好吧，罪
13:34
就像愛麗絲在這兩個群體中一樣
13:37
會有點忽略愛麗絲的影響和
13:39
只考慮
13:41
說像 um Bob 和 Charlie，他們就像
13:44
在這
13:45
誰是不同的
13:47
嗯，只有這些不同群體的人
13:50
當我們查看獨特的組成員時
13:52
比較兩組的匹配
13:55
打通他們的合作
13:57
並且有各種各樣的這些模型
14:00
我們需要發展到
14:02
真正實現這種願景
14:05
構建多個協調裝置
14:08
嗯，為了群際合作，而不是
14:10
這像
14:11
我們喜歡忽略的奇怪假設
14:14
所有這些關係和種類
14:16
假設我們都是
14:17
像同性戀一樣彼此隔離
14:20
經濟上，但更有可能
14:22
介於兩者之間的一些東西
14:25
就像我們不完全一樣你
14:27
知道像一個代理設置假
14:29
帳戶，然後只宣傳他自己的
14:30
項目，我們可能不是
14:33
孤立，但它就像某種東西
14:36
在這些之間和目標之間
14:37
這裡的公式是我們可以
14:40
考慮到這一點，甚至
14:42
從算法上你知道有這個
14:44
社交圖，然後調整
14:46
二次農業公式一點點
14:48
喜歡那種呃靜音你知道的
14:52
人與人之間的合作
14:55
誰
14:56
自然或跨界分享興趣的人
14:58
團體
15:00
嗯，有很多共享成員
15:01
和
15:03
另一個模型就像偏移二次
15:05
資金，我稍後會分享一些
15:07
您可以挖掘其中的一些資源
15:08
這些型號但基本上都有
15:11
就像一堆開放的問題，所以一個
15:13
像 一個 像 這 像 什麼
15:16
完美或喜歡什麼是好模型
15:18
在不同的環境中工作
15:20
你知道
15:22
識別這些像社交圖
15:26
然後將社交圖譜輸入
15:28
二次融資公式，所以我們
15:31
嗯，有點設置激勵權
15:33
快下集團公司
15:35
然後問題是那裡像
15:37
一種可能適用的模型
15:39
不同的語境是否有變數
15:41
就像說
15:42
你知道你來自或喜歡的國家
15:46
您支持的開源項目或
15:47
就像你有 Twitter 關注者或
15:49
Facebook 追隨者
15:51
相關的所有不同的
15:52
例如，如果你知道的上下文
15:55
音樂的二次融資
15:57
可能音樂品味非常相關
15:59
二次融資權
16:01
Intergroup Corporation 模型，但如果您
16:04
為開源做二次融資
16:05
軟件
16:06
你的 GitHub 活動和喜歡的軟件
16:09
東西似乎更相關
16:12
同樣，問題是關於什麼
16:14
我們是否運行這些技術基板
16:16
操作
16:17
那麼我們應該在以太坊上運行它嗎
16:20
嗯，我們在哪裡存儲社交圖譜
16:22
就像我正在做的一個項目
16:24
gitcoin 是我們的 gitcon 護照
16:26
基本上嘗試
16:28
使人們能夠增加個人地址
16:31
包含各種憑據
16:33
關於自己喜歡
16:35
你知道他們有多少粉絲
16:36
並最終喜歡他們的追隨者
16:38
是並且喜歡他們有什麼項目
16:41
在 GitHub 和 Etc 上做出貢獻或
16:43
我認為我們應該將其存儲在 ipfs 上嗎
16:44
可能不會像一個
16:47
正確回答所有社區
16:48
可能喜歡 web 3 社區和
16:50
比特幣
16:51
將與類似的技術一起工作
16:54
ipfs 或 ethereum 但也許如果你是
16:56
你就像一個政府組織
16:58
可能更喜歡自行託管它
17:00
您正在管理的安全數據庫
17:03
你知道如果你是一個堅定的人說
17:06
公司你可能會
17:08
知道使用定理，但你也可以
17:10
先賣或喜歡在亞馬遜網上做
17:12
服務器或其他
17:13
同樣地
17:15
如你所見，我的意思是已經
17:17
解釋二次投票不是嗯
17:19
你知道最簡單的，雖然我覺得像
17:22
一旦你嘗試過，一旦你知道你
17:24
獲得二次投票或喜歡
17:27
看著這些鏡頭，但無論如何
17:29
嗯，如果我們真的想擴展這個和
17:31
像想像未來或像我們一樣
17:34
真的像二次方一樣部署這些
17:37
資助複數二次資助模型
17:38
就像這個龐大的社交圖
17:40
我們不只是考慮
17:42
你知道地理多樣性，但我們
17:44
也考慮你知道嗯
17:47
嗯，你知道你的在線活動和
17:50
您所屬的其他類似群組
17:52
你參與這些投票
17:54
和全球的融資流程
17:57
就像我們需要畫圖一樣
18:00
或者喜歡講述這個故事
18:02
世界可能看起來像然後幫助
18:04
應該使用這些系統的人
18:06
理解他們的權利，因為它是
18:09
如果你不是真的很奇怪
18:11
了解投票機制如何
18:13
你正在使用的作品，所以我認為
18:15
他們就像你知道機制設計
18:17
問題技術問題也
18:19
喜歡這些操作的複雜性
18:21
你知道那種呈指數增長的
18:23
更多的
18:24
您添加到社交圖譜的維度
18:26
並且喜歡通過二次方程的變量
18:28
資金公式真的
18:30
使計算更加昂貴並且
18:33
然後真的只是解釋這些東西
18:35
給使用它和喜歡它的社區
18:37
激勵人們為此努力
18:39
嗯，基本上
18:41
嗯，你知道是時候破解了
18:43
然後像建立一些原型和
18:46
用這些東西做實驗，所以我想
18:49
一個很大的工作領域顯然是
18:51
就像社交圖一樣
18:53
工作顯然有一堆
18:55
社交圖在那裡的東西 Facebook
18:58
事情 Twitter 我想嗯 Reddit 你知道
19:01
他們都有 api 可以讓你
19:04
人們是一種醬類
19:07
任何東西的一部分
19:10
和嗯
19:12
你知道一種是映射出來的
19:14
這些社交圖
19:16
然後餵養這些社交圖譜
19:18
喜歡
19:19
像它一樣的眾籌項目
19:21
或者從高爾夫零開始的這個項目
19:24
例子
19:25
使匹配更多
19:27
多元化的例如或其他想法
19:29
可能
19:31
你知道可以看起來呃整合
19:33
這些類型的技術進入
19:34
Slack 等生產力軟件
19:36
所以你知道考慮像一個
19:39
用於高爾夫零的渣板，例如
19:41
社區
19:42
他們會考慮什麼渠道
19:44
例如你很活躍或喜歡什麼
19:47
你知道你參與的頻道
19:49
然後像你一樣福斯特
19:51
這些端口就像什麼時候一樣好
19:54
應該是
19:55
下一個高爾夫零賽事的標題
19:57
例如，你拉起那個游泳池
20:01
喜歡這個調查喜歡然後人
20:03
參與這項民意調查並這樣做
20:05
他們可以二次投票，但你
20:07
也會
20:08
像嗯考慮像社交圖
20:11
我們從鬆弛中得到的喜歡
20:13
這些都是你認識的人嗎
20:15
在台北分會工作
20:18
嗯政府零誰支持這個或
20:20
這些真的是來自不同的人嗎
20:21
城市或喜歡不同的頻道
20:24
不知道特別喜歡什麼
20:25
以高爾夫為例的通道結構
20:27
零
20:28
還有一個可能有用的工具包
20:31
對你們所有人來說，這就像嗯
20:33
我們稱之為 Grants 2.0 太好了，恭喜
20:36
以前像 web 2.5 一樣運行
20:39
應用程序基本上就像它一樣
20:41
基本上這個 Django 應用程序主要是
20:44
喜歡閱讀來自的捐贈
20:46
區塊鏈，然後進行匹配
20:49
計算和一切都關閉
20:51
像正常計算一樣的鏈
20:53
基礎設施
20:54
現在我們正在構建一個叫做
20:56
贈款 2.0 我們基本上是在構建
20:59
就像一個開源的呃社交圖
21:03
叫我喜歡的kitcon護照
21:05
前面提到了人們可以善良的地方
21:07
收集這些憑據
21:08
他們自己
21:09
就像你知道的項目中心
21:11
喜歡不同的項目，比如開源
21:12
零之類的項目可以呈現
21:14
嘿，我們做 a b c 和 Y
21:16
然後你可以作為開發者選擇
21:19
從這些不同的複數二次
21:21
資金和投票模式讓你
21:23
基本上即插即用希望喜歡
21:25
在幾分鐘或幾小時內
21:27
部署您的獨立二次方
21:29
例如，像您這樣的資助計劃
21:31
像高爾夫球一樣思考零二次
21:33
資助計劃你得到一些匹配
21:36
像支持者一樣資助，然後你
21:38
說我們想資助政府零項目，所以
21:40
政府零項目註冊
21:42
然後你知道設置項目
21:46
你想接受
21:48
然後決定哪些身份可以
21:50
參與決定你的變量
21:53
知道你的社會文化標誌是什麼
21:55
想考慮
21:56
然後點擊部署運行二次
21:59
資助計劃並分散一些
22:02
基於匹配
22:03
你知道複數二次融資
22:05
獎勵項目的邏輯
22:08
有很多捐款很多很多
22:10
國家還要
22:12
嗯不同的支持者群體
22:14
如果你想深入挖掘
22:16
這項工作
22:18
顯然一切都在激進
22:20
交流博客太棒了，我真的
22:22
推薦 Joelle Miller 的這個視頻
22:24
呃我也喜歡借了一堆
22:27
喬爾的視覺效果實際上就像你一樣
22:30
在 YouTube 上找到它，就像被稱為
22:31
kuduri 有趣的多元主義經濟學
22:33
喬爾·米勒公益呼籲
22:36
路走更詳細
22:38
變成喜歡這些不同的複數
22:41
二次投票和融資的版本
22:43
呃去中心化社會論文
22:45
尋找什麼三個靈魂
22:47
種多應用複數範式
22:50
整體上
22:53
到 web3
22:55
然後我在 gitcon 上寫了這篇文章
22:58
治理表格 gov.gidcon.com
23:01
令牌可以使它更加一致
23:03
多元化的
23:04
這有點接近這個談話
23:07
並在喬爾之前出版
23:09
展示了所有這些很酷的東西
23:11
更酷的模型和我的那個
23:13
這裡介紹
23:15
嗯，是的，但是這些有點像
23:17
可以深入挖掘的好資源
23:19
這項工作
23:20
Audrey tang 和 lenweil 將出版
23:22
預訂複數 呃 稍後某個時候
23:26
今年實際上將是嗯
23:28
呃有點像git一樣寫
23:31
結構，所以你甚至可以提出建議
23:33
更改書籍並對其進行投票或
23:36
還使用原核投票和
23:39
類似的東西
23:40
嗯，看看這個關於激進的帖子
23:42
交換博客它也可用於所有
23:44
各種語言和
23:46
也在尋找這本書的譯者
23:48
但這可能真的有助於
23:51
像一個有凝聚力的背景一樣構建
23:54
任何有興趣的人的資源
23:56
將來的複數並且不適用
23:58
只是到 web 3 但各種形式如果
24:00
我們會喜歡技術和
24:01
組織
24:03
嗯，非常感謝你邀請我
24:05
嗯，很高興來到這裡
24:07
如果您有任何問題，請告訴我
24:09
想用好硬幣在你的身上工作
24:13
喜歡自己的二次投票或資助
24:15
使用我們的開源工具包的平台
24:17
稱為 git congrants
24:19
gigcon 護照已經上線了，我們
24:21
有一個你可以採購的 SDK
24:25
只需訪問 passport.clickon.co 即可找到
24:27
過多
24:28
非常感謝你讓我和嗯
24:32
是的，10 月 21 日見