# Meta-tx Community Call Agenda 0.1

### Agenda:

- *Quick contextual introduction of this community call*

- *Introduction of today's agenda / tickets to talk about*

- Does anyone want to add anything else onto the agenda?

- **Introduce everyone:** what they are working on. If they are working on meta-txs how much so far

---

- **Building decentralised network where to start?**

- Lead discussion, research and development first by MVP

- Gather requirements, schema designs of different teams (even just 3-6 teams is good)

- Identify an MVP (Harbour MVP trusted network of nodes that get TX, check then executes, no economics for now)

Service node...

1. Checks if executable
2. Checks if execution conditions are met
3. Checks if tx is economically viable

- ***Define the requirements, share schema designs, needs of different parties***

Harbour MVP Design?
https://www.figma.com/file/VI2SUEmQLilTQrwENKou2YOE/Meta-tx?node-id=0%3A1

- **Research items**

Ideally 2-3 steps ahead of community development

- Tx propagation throughout the network
- Staking / slashing
- Economic rewards of miners

---

### Operational items of interest

- **Language:** Get on the same page with the words we use

https://github.com/austintgriffith/meta-transaction-format-share/issues/8

- **Decide on a org name for the github**

--- FullMeta Alchemists
--- El Cartel de las Meta (ECDLM)
--- Long Range Ballistic Transactions (LRBT)??? lmao

- **Github repositiories**

Coordinate around three main github repositories

--- PM ~ all project coordination details

--- Community MVP

--- Research ~ All things related to the design of meta-tx network

Call comments / chat

From Me to Everyone: (04:50 pm)

https://hackmd.io/WmHWgQDrSW6cgES9x2HXfw?view

From alexvandesande to Everyone: (05:02 pm)

agenda: https://hackmd.io/-fF2VKIFRzyiWaxVQAh0wA?view

From Austin Griffith to Everyone: (05:06 pm)

So many awesome people here that I’ve been following for a long time now. So happy to be here with you guys! This will be hard to organize.

From Matthew Garnett to Everyone: (05:06 pm)

i’m in a standup meeting for bounties network rn, but we are interested into potentially using meta-tx / universal logins for our products. I also hacked together a serverless tx relayer last weekend, i feel like this is a great situation to apply serverless

From Mokhtar Bacha to Everyone: (05:25 pm)

Hello, I’m want to introduce my self I working at Consensys on a project called fuel about meta-tx
This is some of my actual work:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/fuel-web3-provider
https://github.com/ahmb84/fuel-node-example

From Austin Griffith to Everyone: (05:25 pm)

:wave: ^^ I think I saw you work a couple months ago in a Gitcoin thread

From Mokhtar Bacha to Everyone: (05:25 pm)

Say me what you think about tit

From Austin Griffith to Everyone: (05:27 pm)

https://github.com/austintgriffith/meta-transaction-format-share

From Piotr-ChronoLogic to Everyone: (05:28 pm)

Thanks for organising the meeting. Meta TX FTW!

From James Young to Everyone: (05:30 pm)

Thanks everyone, really good conversation. I have to leave (conflict with another open call)

From Austin Griffith to Everyone: (05:30 pm)

We need @piotr to head up the “Red Team” :)

From Me to Everyone: (05:30 pm)

thanks^^

From mp to Everyone: (05:32 pm)

Taking all notes just in case someone drops - will upload later :)

From Matthew Garnett to Everyone: (05:34 pm)

can someone explain the benefit of having a network of relayers that need to come to consensus on who will be executing which transaction VS organization deploying their own relayers

From Mokhtar Bacha to Everyone: (05:34 pm)

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nLYDTWFu3kMopeLGWIglM44w4zYUkD3TzkDbcnXU8oo/edit?usp=sharing

From beltran to Everyone: (05:36 pm)

Can we also separate the various parts that would need to be solved and discussed together?
for now I count
- standard of the signature
- collision
- cryptoeconomic mechanism

From Marek Kirejczyk to Everyone: (05:36 pm)

Matthew: that could work. One challenge is when signatures for one transaction come from different relayers.
*dapps

From Matthew Garnett to Everyone: (05:37 pm)

i feel like it is creating a very difficult problem where we need develop this consensus mechanism plus we also need to accurately value different assets that are submitting as payment for this relaying action (this is why staking is homogeneous — it minimizes the attack surface on the network)