---
tags: web3, hyperCert, FABDAO
---

### Resource
- HyperCert [doc](https://testnet.hypercerts.org/docs/)
- Noah 整理 HyperCert 討論案例的[template](https://g0v.hackmd.io/@da0/H1cmGxI13?fbclid=IwAR2qv4aKYKHpEyPdTnmy6INssrr7kxN5jHS1UrHHvRsoxEWYYq2NTWwgrQw)
- HyperCert 應用from Da0
- [g00d class](https://g0v.hackmd.io/@da0/B1MByRHk3?fbclid=IwAR1G3pDGMXQ0RU7pP_jX_ODkP8I7812-LaMCxjulBSOamhaB3kLy5SZyhgE)
- [studio0](https://g0v.hackmd.io/@da0/Bk17WxI13?fbclid=IwAR1Gx7wAzvRHkzU_WWrucoGWeJjwhQI2zW2QE6WR2XwRuvtjeLdRs0NYDNI)

- quick onboarding
- 推薦 [背景](https://hackmd.io/@ESflAgYRSuGj8zqWBfJYAQ/SJe82VHij)
- 推薦 [davidad影片](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hOhOdCbBlU)
- ERC1155, ERC721
- ERC3525補充 [文章](https://www.blocktempo.com/what-is-erc3525-token-and-who-made-it/)
- slot
- 參考 [TCFAx減塑xHyperCert提案](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hzxerhTDbu_hJmXhAhrXseax1i3QIORU/edit#slide=id.p20)

### 討論事項
0. 關於這個討論群
- 繼續在FB or 有需要公開給其他FABDAO友參加, 回DC後 附上目前討論紀錄
- keep 共筆形式紀錄討論

(proposed by 豆泥)

1. 釐清FABDAO使用 HyperCert 的想像
- Frank: 短(2~3個月可能會使用到的) 中(主要想要運行的目的) 長(隨意發想)期
- 短: 磺溪生活流域專案引入NFT 作為第一次嘗試
- 中: FABDAO內部貢獻度證明 + 可能金流(百岳基金or future 任何來源)
- 扣回最初討論的想法
- 坑內 : 磺溪生活流域 為例
- 坑和坑之間： 工作小組 為例
- 所有坑的總和，對外 長期，等前兩個成功再繼續發想, 也比較可以完善

2. HyperCert該討論的部分 (不確定有沒有更好的討論順序 有建議都可以改
- 完成 [FABDAO 超証企劃書](https://hackmd.io/@IA3HGZ7gQFi7IaBVvwY_IA/BJVXwxv1h)
1. ==目標討論== (上週四與Noah 討論 希望先擬定一個GOAL$$ , 週四晚FABDAO討論中期應用+週五會與磺溪生活流域團隊討論短期應用)
- Noah: $$ , 優勢是FABDAO目前多是"志工"性質, 但還是可以以此擬定一個具體目標
- Frank: 舉例 工時*基本工時 作為基本估算?
- 短期: 磺溪
- 中期: FABDAO (除了==百岳資金==之外, 不確定是單純使用百岳資金還是 預期有其他的)
- 行動客廳
- 藝術銀行
- 超証
- (廚房) 是否要納入 還是就完全排除
- 游擊發起
- 舉例 若Frank想申請 怎麼申請 表格怎麼填
- FABDAO timeline 發展時間軸
- fork g0v-DashBoard -> FABDAO dashboard 以此2例往下思考

2. 獎助方式
- [Scenarios](https://hackmd.io/@ESflAgYRSuGj8zqWBfJYAQ/rkNnoNrjo)連結失效
- Hypercerts with simple retroactive funding 現有討論目標
- 目前以志工性質+填寫HyperCert 作為實驗
- prospective + retrospective evaluations
- 想像中 執行較有可能永續的方式之一
- prospective
- 申請 百岳基金一部分作為 行動客廳 每個專案的$
- retrospective
- 後續再申請百岳資金?
- funding 之可能來源? Da0, ESG, or others
- 若FABDAO專案都以NFT 為目標產出之一, 另規劃一個錢包 作為所有參與HyperCert的一項 = Artist club ?
- 有持有該專案的人都可以繼續分潤 作為長期持有的回報
- 有無需要排除已經分潤過的人
- ==evaluater 是誰==
- how
- when
- what
- Prize competition with hypercerts
- FABDAO未來投票 作為使用百岳資金的其中一項提案 if 通過再討論如何規劃/ 獎助proactive or retrspective 專案
3. Distribution
- Frank: 還不太懂實際意義，發放的時機? 發放給誰? 一次統一發?

4. Anything other thing?

3. ==重要提問==
- 百岳Holder 才可申請 HyperCert? (FABDAO內部)
- Swift: 三階段制度
- 第一階段 以百岳holder 才能申請
- 以有受到hypercert教育的內部成員，做好榜樣，吸引外部注意；同時可以令傳媒報導，亦增加百岳的持有者優勢，也可以吸引外部買入百岳
- 第二階段 尋得 三至五位 百岳holder 支持 才能申請
- 建立在第一階段成功推行者的支持/推薦之上。令到引入的申請活動，較為優質及已被過濾。同時，亦明確一種層次分明的第二步動作
- 第三階段 公開申請
- 達至第三階段時，第一及二階段產生的內部工作人員增多；公開申請時，可以分派工作給與 第一及第二階段的百岳持有者，壯大內部團隊及增加各人實踐經驗
- 補充: 不是去想排除，而是他有貢獻，倒是值得擁有百岳 / 或是以貢獻度換有折扣，可以入手
- 有無需要分開 不同 public-good space?
- FABDAO運行 <- 百岳資金使用
- FABDAO X NPO 專案 <- 百岳+其他potential funding
- 還是把他列入 不同類別 大HyperCert的其中一個貢獻
5. 實際討論各個Protocal Labs 預設的Field **如何填** [FABDAO HyperCert]()
- public-good space 有無撰寫規則
- 自由填寫or 先預想各種可能+格式? Impact space有無軸度/分類 先定好大方向 ex [design]-[design什麼]/ [企劃] - [企劃什麼]
- scope of contribute
- scope of time格式
- 可否補填 還是需要在工作前期填寫才算
- 誰可以填 (各個專案/區負責人)填寫
- %%
- Distribution
- Frank: 還不太懂實際意義，發放的時機? 發放給誰? 一次統一發?

- 3/12 TG討論補充:
- 

- 3/22 1800討論
- 以鼓勵志工性質為主, evaluation 等之後百岳資金運動章程出來在決定
- 工作內容:
- 近期
- 決定 行動客廳(磺溪專案) hyperCert機制
- 決定 藝術銀行(Tezos購藏) hyperCert機制
- 長期
- HyperCert 諮詢小組
- 教育
- Evaluation? \
- 決定討論方式
- DC, telegram
- 決定工作模式
- 討論出 hyperCert 具體需要決定事情的幾個方案
- 例如 issuer給誰(1. 各小組聯絡人, 2.每個人)
- 討論出 hyperCert 小組自己傾向的方案並說明
- 例如 issuer先以各小組聯絡人為主，確保真實性(+說明現有PL hyperCert問題)
- 如果沒有反對意見即可往下走，若有 則需要開放討論+決定如何進行
- GOAL
- 下次開會(3/29)完成 HyperCert計劃書
- 下次開會(3/29)完成 藝術銀行第一次機制
- 3月底藝術銀行(3/31)藏購會議後 嘗試run 第一次

4. 其他
- An IFS consists of 一個影響力資助系統的組成包括
- Actors: Contributors, funders, evaluators, and beneficiaries 參與者： 貢獻者、資助者、評估者和受益者
- Funding mechanisms: Grants, bounties, retrospective funding, etc. 資助機制： 贈款、獎金、追溯資助等。
- Coordination mechanisms: Roadmapping, communication forums, etc. 協調機制： 路線圖、交流論壇等。
- - A goal: Maximize the domain-specific positive value created (impact) 一個目標： 最大限度地創造特定領域的積極價值（影響）

- 完成 IFS [問題](https://hackmd.io/@ESflAgYRSuGj8zqWBfJYAQ/SyLmk1dhs)
- 設計 IFS 應該考慮的問題 Guiding questions for designing IFSs
- 專案： 我們如何才能提高最有前途的項目得到實施的機會？ Projects: How can we improve the chances that the most promising projects are worked on?
- 人才與資源： 我們如何吸引頂尖人才為最有前途的項目做出貢獻，並為他們提供必要的資源?Talent & resources: How can we attract top talent to contribute to the most promising projects and provide them with the necessary resources?
- 努力： 我們如何獎勵貢獻者對結果的影響？ Effort: How can we reward contributors for their impact on outcomes?
- 可持續收入： 我們如何為有影響力的項目創造經常性收入流和財務可持續性？Sustainable income: How can we create recurring income streams and financial sustainability for impactful projects?

- 詢問 HyperCert $$
- 公益憑證帳本並不限定應用特定的影響力資助機制。舉例來說，下列各種資助類型理論上都可以應用公益憑證：The Hypercert ledger doesn’t impose any specific impact-funding mechanism. For examples the following types of funding are possible:
- 獎助：資助人在工作完成之前就無條件地預先向執行團隊購買公益憑證。Grants: A funder buys a Hypercert from a team before the work has been done without any conditions for the grantee
- 賞金：資助人預先「承諾」（可藉由智能合約來實現）向專案購買公益憑證，只要團隊屆時能順利完成特定的活動或創造特定的成果。Bounties: A funder commits – for example via a smart contract – to buy a Hypercert from a project if a clearly defined activity has been performed or an output has been created
- 回溯性評估：專案團隊產出某些正向影響並為之鑄造公益憑證，然後資助人才回過頭評估這些影響並購入憑證。Retrospective evaluations: A team creates some impact and mints a Hypercert for it, a funder evaluates it and buys it retrospectively

- 參考 HyperCert [stepbystep guide](https://testnet.hypercerts.org/docs/minting-guide/step-by-step)
- 可能比較困難的
- Work Scope fields
- Work Scope
- One or multiple tags describe the work that the hypercert represents. This work scope will be used to identify the work that is included in the hypercerts and the work that is not included.
- Multiple tags are logically conjunctive, e.g. Planting trees ∧ Germany means that the hypercert includes the planting of trees only in Germany, but not planting trees anywhere else or any other work in Germany that wasn't planting trees.
- We recommend just a short form of the project name as a single tag. In most cases that will be sufficient.
- Note: In the future, you will be able to specifically exclude work from the hypercert.
- Start and End Date of Work
- The work time period defines when the work was done that the hypercert represents, i.e., only the work in this time period is included in the hypercert.
- The time period of work doesn't need to be the start and end date of a project, but it can be. One project can be split up into multiple hypercerts, e.g. all hypercerts can have the same work scope, but different time periods of work. Of course, the time periods are not allowed to overlap.
- Impact scope fields
- Impact Scope
- The impact scope can be used to limit the impact that a hypercert represents, e.g. for the work scope Planting trees a hypercert can represent only the impact on biodiversity by including the impact scope tag Biodiversity. This would exclude all other impacts, including the impact on CO2 in the atmosphere, which can be useful if that impact is already captured by a carbon credit.
- By default this is set to "all" and we strongly recommend keeping it that way.
- Just like the work scope, multiple impact scope tags are logically conjunctive.
- Start and End Date of Impact
- The impact time period is another way to limit the impact that a hypercert represents, e.g. inventing a new medical treatment has a positive impact over many years, but we might want to capture the positive impact separately for each year.
- By default the impact start date is the same as the work start date and the impact end date is "indefinite", i.e., the impact is not restricted time-wise. We strongly recommend keeping it that way.
- Set of Contributors
- Provide a list of contributors, one per line, or comma-separated.
- The list should include all contributors that performed the described work.
- Contributors are generally itemized as wallet addresses or ENS names, but can also be names / pseudonyms. Groups of contributors can be represented by a multisig or name of an organization.

- Owners
- Allowlist
- The allowlist allocates fractions of the hypercert to specific wallet addresses. These wallet addresses are then allowed to claim these fractions afterwards. For example, it can be used to allocate fractions to previous funders and contributors.
- The allowlist is implemented as a CSV file specifying index,address,price,fractions headers.
- The price field is denominated in ETH. This should remain at 0.0 for all hypercerts, as primary sales are not currently supported through the app and the secondary sale/transfer of hypercerts is currently not allowed.

- Rights
- This field defines the rights that owners of the hypercert have over the work being claimed by this hypercert.
- By default this is set to Public Display, i.e., the owners are allowed to publicly display the hypercert and show their support of the work.
- Note: In the future, additional rights can be included for different hypercerts.

- [Sol API](https://network-goods.github.io/hypercerts-docs/contracts)

### 相關紀錄
- FABDAO HyperCert討論紀錄
- DC
- [2/20實體共識會@打開當代](https://hackmd.io/@FABDAO/letsgo/%2F9MgH7vPNSZSqEszvz6pJmQ?fbclid=IwAR1qWnEpF8MLv_Qk9jUDRFKI-sw96jqbeyjnefP82zKCqVvHu0WSsSbAz3s)
- HyperCert part
- [大綱](https://hackmd.io/@FABDAO/H1jU6OxAs?fbclid=IwAR2nUj4I6nizjja2k4KHr12B-EwLRmdRjROBMexfWABlkeH332z8-kAH0VM)
- 大體上將分為：
- FAB DAO內部情境運用（為主）
- 邀請更多NGO參與試驗（未定）
- 須建立衡量邏輯：坑內／坑與坑之間 / 對外
- 階段一：大家都要參與＋共識產生的合理性（ex.工作坊、大會）
- 階段三：SROI（對內、對外）（文末附簡要說明）
- 階段三：分配（要加權嗎？還是怎麼算）
- 兩個討論面向
- 在何時單一化標準：專案起頭 / 專案結尾
- 發放的權力：集中 / 分散
- 超證，也許是讓非營利行動者更能掌握自決 / 自覺的工具
- 百岳資金是否在最後扮演獎勵金的角色

- 實際討論
- FAB DAO內部情境運用（為主）
- 豆泥快速說明HyperCert應用
- 過去公部門 - 政府
- Web3公部門- 公鍊基金會/ 據有公共性企業的組織等
- hyperCert 好寶寶獎章 未來可以認購這個好寶寶獎章
- Noah Da0 幫g0v去創作公共性的證明
- 放到FABDAO 在內鼓勵做事的人
- 尚未補齊[分場討論會摘要](https://hackmd.io/@FABDAO/letsgo/%2FO1n4O8-yRESV1-zpCJ2X5g?fbclid=IwAR1qWnEpF8MLv_Qk9jUDRFKI-sw96jqbeyjnefP82zKCqVvHu0WSsSbAz3s)