Contributors:
References:
CDEvents brings standardization for events consumed and produced by tools in the SDLC. Some of the tools that are candidate for CDEvents adoption already produce events, in their own specific formats. Some of these events exist or can be mapped to events available in the CDEvents specification. Some events might be added to CDEvents, if they're considered for interoperability by the CDEvents community. Some events however, are very specific to a tool or are not relevant from an interoperability point of view.
This document proposes the introduction of custom event types as a mean to make it easier for tools to adopt CDEvents and provide event producers and consumer with a consistent way to produce and consume events aligned to the CDEvents specification.
This proposal involves changes to the specification and accordingly to the SDKs.
The following changes are introduced to the specification:
dev.cdeventsx
event-type namespace: the dev.cdeventsx
namespace for event types is introduced. This namespace is reserved for events that are compliant with the CDEvents specification, whose subject structure and semantics are defined outside of CDEvents.schemaURI
property in the context
: events may supply their schema URI via this new context
property, as described in the corresponding issue. Events must always validate against the CDEvents official schema too.dev.cdeventsx
jsonschema: any event of type dev.cdeventsx.*
must respect this schema as well as any additional schema supplied via schemaURI
subject
format for dev.cdeventsx
events: subjects must be in the format <tool-name>-<subject-name>
to avoid event-type conflicts across toolsWhen consuming (parsing) an event with context.schemaURI
, SDKs will have to be able to fetch the schema defined in context.schemaURI
and additionally validate the event against the supplied schema.
When consuming (parsing) an event with dev.cdeventsx
type, the SDKs will return a object that is identical in structure for all events, and which include an unparsed blob for the subject.content
part. SDKs may provide a way for users to register a function to be used to parse the subject.content
of these messages.
When producing events, the SDK may provide a way for users to register additional functions to be used to render dev.cdeventsx
events as JSON
and CloudEvents
.
In certain cases, custom events may be implemented as a stopgap solution to allow for faster CDEvents adoption. The custom events may be eventually make its way into the CDEvents specification, with a structure that could be different from the original one defined in the custom events.
This situation is not dissimilar from the process of adopting a new, backwards incompatible version of an existing event. Once the new CDEvent is introduced in the spec, newer versions of the SDKs will be able to produce it and consume it.
To create a new CDEvent, start with the guide available in the CDEvents primer. Use cases and experiences from using the custom event would be a great addition to the proposal:
It is safe to assume that several producers and consumers of the event exist. At some point in time only a fraction of producers and consumers will have adopted the new SDK.
Consumers with the latest SDK will be able to parse the old custom event as well as the new CDEvent. This means that there is no pressure for producers to adopt the new version, even after all consumers have been updated.
Consumers with the old SDK however, won't be able to parse the new CDEvents. This means that producers that adopt the new SDK may have to consider producing both the old and the new events, until all consumers have update to the latest SDK. In this case, it is responsability of the system architect to ensure that old events are only sent to legacy consumers, to avoid the case of consumers receiving duplicate events.
The CDEvents community is working on the introduction of links to the specification. Links will let CDEvents producer connect one event to others with specific semantics, and will help consumers trace through events to understand complete workflows.
Custom CDEvents can be linked like any other CDEvent, so links may exist between custom CDEvents as well as between a custom CDEVent and a normal CDEvent.
Harbor is a popular open source registry and a graduated project at the CNCF. The Harbor registry can produce CloudEvents today, and the project community is enthustiastic about adopting CDEvents. They do have one concern though, they would like Harbor users that adopt the CDEvents feature to have access to the same range of events they have through the existing CloudEvents feature.
Harbor supports todays the following events (webhook notifications):
PUSH_ARTIFACT
PULL_ARTIFACT
DELETE_ARTIFACT
SCANNING_COMPLETED
SCANNING_STOPPED
SCANNING_FAILED
QUOTA_EXCEED
QUOTA_WARNING
REPLICATION
TAG_RETENTION
According to the Harbor requirements, each of the ten Harbor events should be mapped to a CDEvent. The secionts below shows an analysis for each event of what the mapping could look like.
Artifact events have a good matches the existing dev.cdevents.artifact.*
CDEvents.
Harbor fields that do not exist on the corresponding CDEvent would go in customData
and could be promoted over time into the CDEvents schema. Harbor could maintain the schema for the fields in customData
.
The artifact events from Harbor may include an array of resources.
On CDEvents side, the first resource would be used as subject, and the whole list would be included in the customData
.
dev.cdevents.artifact.published
customData
dev.cdevents.artifact.downloaded
customData
dev.cdevents.artifact.deleted
customData
This example is taken from the Harbor docs:
{
"specversion": "1.0",
// id is a generated UUID to make sure the unique
"id": "66e18103-09c1-41f6-982f-37df223f3eeb",
// requestid is the http request id for tracing the source request of this event
"requestid": "51c0b694-0168-4f3c-b0db-282565455d7b",
"source": "/projects/2/webhook/policies/15",
"type": "harbor.artifact.pushed",
"datacontenttype": "application/json",
"time": "2023-04-03T06:04:46Z",
"data": {
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"tag": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"resource_url": "localhost/harbor/alpine@sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4"
}
],
"repository": {
"date_created": 1680501893,
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
}
},
"operator": "harbor-jobservice"
}
Corresponding CDEvents:
{
"context": {
"version": "0.4.0-draft",
"id": "271069a8-fc18-44f1-b38f-9d70a1695819",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "dev.cdevents.artifact.published.0.2.0-draft",
"timestamp": "2023-03-20T14:27:05.315384Z",
"schemaURI": "https://goharbor.io/cdevents/schema/artifact/published/0_2_0"
},
"subject": {
"id": "pkg:oci/localhost/harbor/alpine@sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "artifact",
"content": {
"sbom": {
"uri": "https://sbom.repo/myorg/234fd47e07d1004f0aed9c.sbom"
},
"user": "harbor-jobservice"
}
},
"customData": {
"requestid": "98ecbced-4169-443b-8e19-459a8c81675d",
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"tag": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"resource_url": "localhost/harbor/alpine@sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4"
}
],
"repository": {
"date_created": 1680501893,
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
}
}
}
Artifact scanning events do not have a direct match on CDEvents. There are a few options available:
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-scanning.*
event types, with type, subject.type
and subject.content
maintained by HarborWhen using existing or new CDEvents, Harbor fields that do not exist on the corresponding CDEvent would go in customData
and could be promoted over time into the CDEvents schema. Harbor could then maintain the schema for the fields in customData
.
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-scan.completed
customData
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-scan.stopped
customData
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-scan.failed
customData
This example is taken from the Harbor docs:
{
"specversion": "1.0",
"id": "64bce2fe-6159-454d-8389-852d01ef1e9d",
"requestid": "98ecbced-4169-443b-8e19-459a8c81675d",
"source": "/projects/2/webhook/policies/15",
"type": "harbor.scan.completed",
"datacontenttype": "application/json",
"time": "2023-04-03T06:12:55Z",
"data": {
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"resource_url": "localhost/harbor/alpine@sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"scan_overview": {
"application/vnd.security.vulnerability.report; version=1.1": {
"report_id": "af0546c1-67dc-4e9d-927e-372900ead0df",
"scan_status": "Success",
"severity": "None",
"duration": 8,
"summary": {
"total": 0,
"fixable": 0,
"summary": {}
},
"start_time": "2023-04-03T06:12:47Z",
"end_time": "2023-04-03T06:12:55Z",
"scanner": {
"name": "Trivy",
"vendor": "Aqua Security",
"version": "v0.37.2"
},
"complete_percent": 100
}
}
}
],
"repository": {
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
}
},
"operator": "auto"
}
Corresponding CDEvent using a testing event:
{
"context": {
"version": "0.4.0-draft",
"id": "271069a8-fc18-44f1-b38f-9d70a1695819",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "dev.cdevents.testcaserun.finished.0.1.0",
"timestamp": "2023-03-20T14:27:05.315384Z",
"schemaURI": "https://goharbor.io/cdevents/schema/testcaserun/finished/0_1_0"
},
"subject": {
"id": "Trivy",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "testCaseRun",
"content": {
"outcome" : "pass",
"environment": {
"id": "prod",
"source": "harbor-prod"
},
"testCase": {
"id": "0001",
"version": "v0.37.2",
"name": "Trivy Scan by Acqua Security",
"type": "security"
}
}
},
"customData": {
"requestid": "98ecbced-4169-443b-8e19-459a8c81675d",
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"resource_url": "localhost/harbor/alpine@sha256:954b378c375d852eb3c63ab88978f640b4348b01c1b3456a024a81536dafbbf4",
"scan_overview": {
"application/vnd.security.vulnerability.report; version=1.1": {
"report_id": "af0546c1-67dc-4e9d-927e-372900ead0df",
"scan_status": "Success",
"severity": "None",
"duration": 8,
"summary": {
"total": 0,
"fixable": 0,
"summary": {}
},
"start_time": "2023-04-03T06:12:47Z",
"end_time": "2023-04-03T06:12:55Z",
"scanner": {
"name": "Trivy",
"vendor": "Aqua Security",
"version": "v0.37.2"
},
"complete_percent": 100
}
}
}
],
"repository": {
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
},
"operator": "auto"
}
}
Operational scanning events do not have a direct match on CDEvents and are not good matches for CDEvents use cases; the proposed route forward for these is to implement them as custom CDEvents owned by Harbor.
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-quota.exceeded
subject.type
and subject.content
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-quota.warning
subject.type
and subject.content
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-replication-status.changed
subject.type
and subject.content
dev.cdeventsx.harbor-tag-retention.finished
subject.type
and subject.content
This example is taken from the Harbor docs:
{
"specversion": "1.0",
"id": "81f243ce-699c-44d6-9dbe-b2ee5f10237a",
"requestid": "4b9dcf9a-db23-460c-9b52-c9d994e362ee",
"source": "/projects/2/webhook/policies/15",
"type": "harbor.quota.exceeded",
"datacontenttype": "application/json",
"time": "2023-04-03T07:04:44Z",
"data": {
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:402d21757a03a114d273bbe372fa4b9eca567e8b6c332fa7ebf982b902207242"
}
],
"repository": {
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
},
"custom_attributes": {
"Details": "adding 2.1 MiB of storage resource, which when updated to current usage of 8.3 MiB will exceed the configured upper limit of 10.0 MiB."
}
},
"operator": ""
}
Corresponding CDEvent using a dev.cdeventsx.*
type:
{
"context": {
"version": "0.1.0",
"id": "271069a8-fc18-44f1-b38f-9d70a1695819",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "dev.cdeventsx.harbor-quota.exceeded.0.1.0",
"timestamp": "2023-03-20T14:27:05.315384Z",
"schemaURI": "https://goharbor.io/cdeventsx/schema/harbor-quota/exceeded/0_1_0"
},
"subject": {
"id": "/projects/2/webhook/policies/15",
"source": "/harbor/alpine",
"type": "quota",
"content": {
"operator": "",
"resources": [
{
"digest": "sha256:402d21757a03a114d273bbe372fa4b9eca567e8b6c332fa7ebf982b902207242"
}
],
"repository": {
"name": "alpine",
"namespace": "harbor",
"repo_full_name": "harbor/alpine",
"repo_type": "private"
},
}
},
"customData": {
"requestid": "4b9dcf9a-db23-460c-9b52-c9d994e362ee",
"details": "adding 2.1 MiB of storage resource, which when updated to current usage of 8.3 MiB will exceed the configured upper limit of 10.0 MiB."
}
}