# Bibliografia
## Capitulo 1: Introduccion
Acosta, O., & Celis, J. (2014). The emergence of doctoral programmes in the Colombian higher education system: Trends and challenges. PROSPECTS, 44(3), 463–481.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9310-5
Aguillo, I. F., Uribe Tirado, A., Universidad de Antioquia, López López, W., & Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. (2017). Visibilidad de los investigadores colombianos según sus indicadores en Google Scholar y ResearchGate. Diferencias y similitudes con la clasificación oficial del sistema nacional de ciencia—COLCIENCIAS. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 40(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v40n3a03
Albornoz, M., Barrere, R., & Sokil, J. (2017). Las Universidades lideran la I+ D en América Latina. En El estado de la Ciencia, RICyT.
http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/files_Estado-de-la-Ciencia-2017_E_2017_2_1_Las_Universidades_lideran_id.pdf
Albornoz, M., & Sebastián, J. (1993). Jorge Sábato revisitado:" Del Triángulo a las Redes". Arbor, 146(575), 117.
Altbach, P. G., & De Wit, H. (2018). Too Much Academic Research Is Being Published. International Higher Education, 96, 2–3.
https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10767
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Brill.
Alwin, D. F., Felmlee, D. H., & Kreager, D. A. (Eds.). (2018). Social Networks and the Life Course: Integrating the Development of Human Lives and Social Relational Networks (Vol. 2). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2019). Towards making research evaluation more compatible with developmental goals. Science and Public Policy, 46(2), 210–218.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy051
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2001). Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy, 30(8), 1221–1234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00143-8
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2005). Latin American Universities: From an Original Revolution to an Uncertain Transition. Higher Education, 50(4), 573–592.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6367-8
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2021). Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120399.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120399
Auriol, L. (2013). Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers Núm. 2013/04; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Vol. 2013/04). https://doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxgs289w-en
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed). The University of Chicago Press.
Bernardi, L., Huinink, J., & Settersten, R. A. (2019). The life course cube: A tool for studying lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 41, 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004
Berry, C., & Taylor, J. (2014). Internationalisation in higher education in Latin America: Policies and practice in Colombia and Mexico. Higher Education, 67(5), 585–601.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9667-z
Boardman, Craig., & Bozeman, Barry. (2007). Role Strain in University Research Centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430–463.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0020
Boardman, P. C., & Corley, E. A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37(5), 900–913.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.012
Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 47–69.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776726
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 716. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
Bozeman, B., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Editor’s introduction: Building and deploying scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 565–568.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.004
Bozeman, B., & Rogers, J. D. (2002). A churn model of scientific knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy, 31(5), 769–794.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00146-9
Brunner, J. J., & Labraña, J. (2020). The Transformation of Higher Education in Latin America: From Elite Access to Massification and Universalisation. En S. Schwartzman (Ed.), Higher Education in Latin America and the Challenges of the 21st Century (pp. 31–41). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44263-7_3
Bucheli, V. (2019). Towards an Analysis of Efficiency in Research, The Case of Colombian Universities. INGENIERÍA Y COMPETITIVIDAD, 21(2), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v21i2.8048
Bucheli, V., Díaz, A., Calderón, J. P., Lemoine, P., Valdivia, J. A., Villaveces, J. L., & Zarama, R. (2012). Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: An intellectual capital-based approach. Scientometrics, 91(2), 369–382.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0627-7
Burton, C. (1997). Las universidades modernas: Espacios de investigación y docencia. Editado por Nueva Imagen/UAM.
Callon, M. (1990). Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 132–161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x
Cañibano, C., Otamendi, F. J., & Solís, F. (2011). International temporary mobility of researchers: A cross-discipline study. Scientometrics, 89(2), 653–675.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0462-2
Cañibano, C., & Potts, J. (2019). Toward an evolutionary theory of human capital. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(3), 1017–1035.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0588-y
Cañibano, C., Woolley, R., Iversen, E. J., Hinze, S., Hornbostel, S., & Tesch, J. (2019). A conceptual framework for studying science research careers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1964–1992.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9659-3
Cárdenas, J. H. (1991). Doctorados. Reflexiones para la formulación de políticas en América Latina. Universidad Nacional de Colombia y el Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo (IDRC).
Cárdenas, J. H., Gutiérrez, M. L., & Pérez, A. (2001). Alternativas para la Educación Doctoral en Colombia.
Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gr??nhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. SAGE.
http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446205358
Casas, R. (2012). Sociedades basadas en el conocimiento y en los procesos de formación de redes. En J. Rios Ortega & C. A. Ramirez Velazquez (Eds.), Oportunidades y retos en la formacion, investigacion y aplicacion del conocimiento bibliotecologico. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
Chalela-Naffah, S., & Rodríguez-Gómez, D. (2020). Caracterización del profesorado con perfil investigador en universidades colombianas. Revista Electrónica Educare, 24(3), 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-3.17
Colciencias, D. A. de C., Tecnología e Innovación. (2013). Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico o de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Año 2013.
Colciencias, D. A. de C., Tecnología e Innovación. (2014). Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico o de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Año 2014.
Colciencias, D. A. de C., Tecnología e Innovación. (2015). Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico o de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Año 2015.
Colciencias, D. A. de C., Tecnología e Innovación. (2018). Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico o de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Año 2018.
Corley, E. A., Bozeman, B., Zhang, X., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). The expanded scientific and technical human capital model: The addition of a cultural dimension. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9611-y
Cotte, A., Andrade, J., Torralba, D., Cifuentes, M., Ramirez, L., Garavito, P., Caho, D., & Pardo, C. (2019). Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, Colombia 2018. 2323-072X
Cox, M., Zhu, J., Ahn, B., London, J., Frazier, S., Torres-Ayala, A., & Chavela Guerra, R. (2011). Choices for Ph.D.s in Engineering: Analyses of Career Paths in Academia and Industry. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 22.324.1-22.324.11. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17605
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Callifornia: Sage.
Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. P. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 71–95.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037
Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2005). The employment of PhDs in firms: Trajectories, mobility and innovation. Research Evaluation, 14(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776292
D’Este, P., Castro Martínez, E., & Molas-Gallart, J. (2009). Documento de base para un Manual de indicadores de vinculación de la universidad con el entorno socioeconómico: Un marco para la discusión. Observatorio Iberoamericano de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Sociedad, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), España.
De Wit, H., de Wit, J. H., Jaramillo, I. C., Knight, J., & Gacel-Avila, J. (2005). Higher education in Latin America: The international dimension (Vol. 638). World Bank Publications.
De-Moya, F., Herrán-Páez, E., Bustos-González, A., Corera-Álvarez, E., Tibaná-Herrera, G., & Rivadeneyra, F. (2021). Ranking iberoamericano de instituciones de educación superior 2020 (SIR Iber). Ediciones Profesionales de la Información.
https://doi.org/10.3145/sir-iber-2021
Dietz, J. S. (2004). Scientists and engineers in academic research centers: An examination of career patterns and productivity. Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/5268/Dietz_James_S_200405_phd.pdf
Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008
D’Onofrio, M. G. (2020). Efectos de los sistemas de evaluación de la investigación en las experiencias de carrera de biólogos moleculares y biotecnólogos del Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) de Argentina. FLACSO, Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales.
D’Onofrio, M. G., & Rogers, J. D. (2022). Key factors affecting the promotion of researchers of the Argentine Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). Research Evaluation, 31(2), 188–201.
D'Onofrio, M. G., Solís, F., Tignino, M. V., & Cabrera, E. (2010). Indicadores de trayectorias de los investigadores iberoamericanos: Avances del Manual de Buenos Aires y resultados de su validación técnica. Buenos Aires: Informe de la Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericana e Interamericana (RICYT).
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (Eds.). (2001). The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248540.001.0001
Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.003
Elder, G. H., & Giele, J. Z. (2009). The craft of life course research. New York. NY, US: Guilford Press.
Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple Helix Clusters: Boundary Permeability at University—Industry—Government Interfaces as a Regional Innovation Strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 766–779.
https://doi.org/10.1068/c1182
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Fischman, G. E., & Ott, M. (2018). Access, equity and quality trends in Latin America’s public universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 86–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.002
Forero, C., & Villaveces, J. L. (2007). Cincuenta años de ciencia en Colombia 1955-2005. Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar 50 años.
Forero‐Pineda, C., & Jaramillo‐Salazar, H. (2002). The access of researchers from developing countries to international science and technology. International social science journal, 54(171), 129–140.
Foss, N. J. (1997). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective. Oxford University Press.
https://books.google.fr/books?hl=es&lr=&id=ZABREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=j9R5jPaNAE&sig=Xw8XpmiNf1taqgyseqpggXSE2h0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Gacel-Ávila, J. (2012). Comprehensive Internationalisation in Latin America. Higher Education Policy, 25(4), 493–510.
https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.9
Gaughan, M., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Science faculty at US research universities: The impacts of university research center-affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.12.001
Gaughan, M., & Ponomariov, B. (2008). Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: Using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 103–110.
https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X287180
Gault, F. (2007). Science, technology and innovation indicators: The context of change. oecd, Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, Paris: oecd, chp, 1, 9–23.
Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2016). Governing Science: How Science Policy Shapes Research Content. European Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 117–168.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047
Godin, B. (2003). The impact of research grants on the productivity and quality of scientific research. Ottawa: INRS Working Paper, 2003.
Godin, B. (2004). Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology (0 ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481523
Gray, D., Sundstrom, E., Tornatzky, L. G., & McGowen, L. (2011). When Triple Helix Unravels: A Multi-Case Analysis of Failures in Industry–University Cooperative Research Centres. Industry and Higher Education, 25(5), 333–345.
https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2011.0057
Guzmán-Tovar, C. (2019). Las ciencias sociales en América Latina desde las trayectorias y las experiencias científicas de sus investigadores. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 14(41), 9–39.
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Herrán Páez, E. (2019). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica colombiana en Scopus 2003-2015.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
Jaramillo Salazar, H. (2009). La formación de posgrado en Colombia. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad, 5(13), 131–155.
Kreimer, P. (2007). Estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología en América Latina:¿ para qué?,¿ para quién?
Kreimer, P., & Vessuri, H. (2018). Latin American science, technology, and society: A historical and reflexive approach. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 17–37.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (Vol. 5). UNESCO publishing. Leicht, A., Heiss, J., Byun, W. J., & UNESCO. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261445
Leitner, K.-H. (2004). Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities. Research Evaluation, 13(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776464
Lepori, B. (2006). Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: From input to positioning indicators. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 133–143.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775995
Lepori, B., Rémi, B., & Filliatreau, G. (2008). New Perspectives and Challenges for the Design and Production of S&T Indicators. Research Evaluation, XVII(1), 33–44.
Lepori, B., van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., van der Meulen, B., Potì, B., Reale, E., Slipersaeter, S., & Theves, J. (2007). Indicators for comparative analysis of public project funding: Concepts, implementation and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X260252
Lepori, B., & Reale, E. (2012). S&T indicators as a tool for formative evaluation of research programs. Evaluation, 18(4), 451–465.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460961
Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64(5), 693–708.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8
Leydesdorff, L., Zhang, L., & Wouters, P. (2022). Trajectories and Regimes in Research and Knowledge Evaluations: Contributions to an Evolutionary Theory of Citation? SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4073223
López, W., Ossa, J. C., Cudina, J. N., Aguilar Bustamante, M. C., Torres, M., Acevedo Triana, C., & Salas, G. (2022). Análisis de la producción y redes de colaboración en los programas de doctorado en psicología en Colombia. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 25(1), 151–182.
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2022.25.1.11
Losada, M. (2016). Current Challenges in Higher Education and Their Implications for Research and Development in Colombia. En H. Horta, M. Heitor, & J. Salmi (Eds.), Trends and Challenges in Science and Higher Education (pp. 67–85). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7_4
Luchilo, L., & Albornoz, M. (2008). Universities and global competition for graduate students: Scenarios for Latin America. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(3), 351–367.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802000120
Lucio, D., & Pardo, C. (2016). Análisis de indicadores de ciencia y tecnología. Universidad del Rosario.
https://doi.org/10.12804/ta9789587387636
Lucio, J., Lucio-Arias, D., & Salazar, S. A. (2013). Observado el Sistemas Colombiano de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: Sus actores y sus productos: Observado el Sistemas Colombiano de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: Sus actores y sus productos. Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.
Luwel, M. (2005). Job advertisements as an indicator for mobility of researchers: Naturejobs as a case study. Research Evaluation, 14(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776328
Marope, P. T. M., Wells, P. J., & Hazelkorn, E. (2013). Rankings and accountability in higher education: Uses and misuses. Unesco.
Martín-Sempere, M. J., Garzón-García, B., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2008). Team consolidation, social integration and scientists’ research performance: An empirical study in the Biology and Biomedicine field. Scientometrics, 76(3), 457–482.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1866-x
Masías-Núñez, R. (2014). Los investigadores sociales en Colombia: Producción, productividad y diferenciación social. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 37(1), 123–156.
Méndez Sayago, J. A., & Vera Azaf, L. (2015). Salarios, incentivos y producción intelectual docente en la universidad pública en Colombia. Apuntes del Cenes, 34, 95–130.
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-30532015000200004&nrm=iso
Miège, B., & Vinck, D. (Eds.). (2012). Les masques de la convergence: Enquêtes sur sciences, industries et aménagements. Éditions des archives contemporaines.
MinCiencias, M. de C., Tecnologia e Innovación, 2021. (2021). Informe de Gestion MinCiencias, 2020.
https://minciencias.gov.co/quienes_somos/planeacion_y_gestion/informegestion
MinCiencias, M. de C., Tecnologia e Innovación, 2021. (2021). Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico o de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. https://minciencias.gov.co/sistemas-informacion/modelo-medicion-grupos
Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of “Third Mission” indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321–330.
https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592
Molina, R. (2009). Capacidades de investigación de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2000-2009: Una aproximación desde el capital intelectual. Vicerrectoría de Investigación.
Nahapiet, J. (2011). A Social Perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199532162.003.0003
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
Navas, L. P., Montes, F., Abolghasem, S., Salas, R. J., Toloo, M., & Zarama, R. (2020). Colombian higher education institutions evaluation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100801.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100801
Nelson, R. R., Dosi, G., Helfat, C. E., Pyka, A., Saviotti, P. P., Lee, K., Dopfer, K., Malerba, F., & Winter, S. G. (2018). Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview (1a ed.). Cambridge University Press;
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928
Núñez, J., Castañeda, C., Castillo, J. F., Forero, D., Martínez, N., & Téllez, O. (2022). Evaluación de impacto de la política de formación de capital humano de alto nivel: Programa de créditos condonables de doctorado 1992-2018.
OECD. (2010). Measuring Innovation.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264059474-en
OECD. (2013). La medición de la innovación.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264177796-es
OECD. (2015). Manual de Frascati 2015.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264310681-es
OECD. (2016). Education in Colombia. OECD.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250604-en
OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD.
https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD.
https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
OECD, & Weltbank (Eds.). (2013). Evaluaciones de políticas nacionales de educación: La educación superior en colombia 2012. OCDE.
Ordóñez‐Matamoros, G., Vernot‐López, M., Moreno‐Mattar, O., & Orozco, L. A. (2020). Exploring the Effects of North–South and South–South Research Collaboration in Emerging Economies, the Colombian Case. Review of Policy Research, 37(2), 174–200.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12378
Orozco, L. A., Ruiz, C. F., Bonilla, R., & Chavarro, D. (2013). Los grupos de investigación en Colombia. Sus prácticas, su reconocimiento y su legitimidad. Colciencias cuarenta años: entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica, 634–687.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., & Bleiklie, I. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Springer.
Paradeise, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2013). Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards. Organization Studies, 34(2), 189–218.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612473550
Paradeise, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2016). La capacité stratégique des établissements d’enseignement supérieur. Odile Jacob.
Pardo, C., & Cotte, A. (Eds.). (2019). Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, Colombia 2018. 2323-072X
Plewa, C. (2010). Key Drivers of University-Industry Relationships and the impact of organisational culture difference.
Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Does Industry Benefit from Cooperative Research Centers More Than Other Stakeholders? An Exploratory Analysis of Knowledge Transactions in University Research Centers. En C. Boardman, D. O. Gray, & D. Rivers (Eds.), Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation (pp. 59–75). Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4388-9_3
Raab, M., & Struffolino, E. (2022). Sequence analysis.
República de Colombia. (1992). Ley de Educación Superior. https://www.redjurista.com/Documents/ley_30_de_1992_congreso_de_la_republica.aspx#/
RICYT. (2017). El estado de la ciencia. Principales indicadores de ciencia y tecnología iberoamericanos. (Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología -Iberoamericana e Interamericana). http://www.ricyt.org/files/Estado%20de%20la%20Ciencia%202017/El_Estado_de_la_Ciencia_2017_Completo.pdf
RICYT. (2020). El estado de la ciencia. Principales indicadores de ciencia y tecnología iberoamericanos. (Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología -Iberoamericana e Interamericana). http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ElEstadoDeLaCiencia_2020.pdf
Rijcke, S. de, Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—A literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038
Ritschard, G., & Studer, M. (Eds.). (2018). Sequence Analysis and Related Approaches: Innovative Methods and Applications (Vol. 10). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95420-2
Rivera, S. C., Torralba, D., & Garavito, P. (2016). Aproximación al análisis de capacidades de investigación de las universidades en Colombia. En D. Lucio & C. Pardo (Eds.), Análisis de indicadores de ciencia y tecnología. Universidad del Rosario. https://doi.org/10.12804/ta9789587387636
Rivera, S. C., Torralba, D., & Ramirez, L. (2018). Capacidades nacionales de ciencia y tecnología. En C. Pardo & A. Cotte (Eds.), Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, Colombia 2017. 2323-072X
Robette, N. (2021). L’analyse statistique des trajectoires: Typologies de séquences et autres approches. Ined Éditions.
https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ined.16670
Rodríguez Sánchez, N. (2017). Medición Desenfocada. Las Ciencias Sociales y Humanas bajo el modelo de medición de Colciencias. Instituto de Unidad de Investigaciones jurídico-sociales" Gerardo Molina"(UNIJUS).
Saforcada, F., Atairo, D., Trotta, L., & Golisano, A. R. (2019). Tendencias de privatización y mercantilización de la universidad en América Latina. Instituto de Estudios y Capacitación-CONADU. https://ei-ie-al. org/sites …. https://iec.conadu.org.ar/files/publicaciones/1574783072_2019-tendencias-de-privatizacion-y-mercantilizacion.pdf
Salazar, M., & Fog, L. (2013). Colciencias hoy. La gobernabilidad debilitada y la pérdida de legitimidad. Colciencias cuarenta años. Entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica, Bogotá, Panamericana Formas e Impresos, 735–767.
Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications.
Sánchez, M., Elena, S., & Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 307–324.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910952687
Sanyal, B., & Varghese, N. (2006). Research capacity of the higher education sector in developing countries. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000153116
Secundo, G., Elena Perez, S., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2017). An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities’ third mission activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 229–239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013
Spender, J.-C. (2011). Human capital and agency theory. En The Oxford handbook of human capital.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Ticehurst, B., & Veal, A. J. (1999). Business research methods: A managerial approach/GW Ticehurst. South Melbourne: Addison Wesley.
Tijssen, R. J. W., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university–industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world’s largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13–24.
https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X393145
Torralba, D., & Ramirez, L. (2019). Perfiles sociodemográficos de los investigadores colombianos reconocidos por Colciencias en las últimas convocatorias de medición de investigadores. En C. Pardo & A. Cotte (Eds.), Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, Colombia 2018. 2323-072X
UIS-Unesco. (2010). Instruction Manual for Completing the Questionnaire on Research and Experimental Development (R&D) Statistics. En UIS-Unesco (Ed.), Survey 2012: Data Collection on Research and Experimental Development (R&D) (p. 20). UIS-Unesco.
UIS - UNESCO. (2021). Using ISCED Diagrams to Compare Education Systems. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/uis-isced-diagramscompare-web.pdf
UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO Science Report 2015: Towards 2030. United Nations.
https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210059053
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Science Report 2021: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development. United Nations.
https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210058575
Universidad de Antioquia, V. de I. (2012). Balance de la investigación en la Universidad de Antioquia.
van den Besselaar, P., & Sandström, U. (2019). Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0202712.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202712
Vélez-Cuartas, G., Gómez-Flórez, H., Úsuga-Ciro, A., & Vélez-Trujillo, M. (2014). Diversidad y reconocimiento de la producción académica en los sistemas de evaluación de la investigación en Colombia. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 37(3), e056. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.3.1133
Vessuri, H., Guédon, J.-C., & Cetto, A. M. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current Sociology, 62(5), 647–665.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839
Villa, E., Cardona Valencia, D., Valencia-Arias, A., Hormechea, K., & García, J. (2020). Transformative Innovation Policy, SDGs, and the Colombian University. En G. Nhamo & V. Mjimba (Eds.), Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education (pp. 169–183). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26157-3_14
Villaveces, J. L. (1991). Los programas doctorales, algunas reflexiones para su iniciación. Doctorados: Reflexiones para la formulación de políticas en América Latina, 307–322.
Villaveces, J. L. (2012). La investigación en Uniandes 2011: Perspectivas de la internacionalización. Universidad de los Andes.
http://site.ebrary.com/id/10692609
Villaveces, J. L., Orozco, L. A., Chavarro, D. A., Ruiz, C. F., Bonilla, R., Bucheli, V. A., & Delgado, L. (2010). La investigación en Uniandes: Construcción de una política. Bogotá, Colombia: Uniandes.[Recuperado 12 de abril de 2013] a partir de http://investigaciones. uniandes. edu. co/index. php/es/publicaciones.
Vinck, D. (2014). Ciencias y sociedad: Sociología del trabajo científico (Primera edición). gedisa editorial.
Vinck, D. (2018). Institutionnalisation balbutiante et fragmentation territoriale. Le cas de la Colombie. En M. Kleiche Dray (Ed.), Les ancrages nationaux de la science mondiale: XVIIIe-XXIe siècles. IRD Éditions. https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_902D543768F9.P001/REF.pdf
Vinkenburg, C. J., Connolly, S., Fuchs, S., Herschberg, C., & Schels, B. (2020). Mapping career patterns in research: A sequence analysis of career histories of ERC applicants. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236252.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236252
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. JSTOR.
Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organizational capabilities: The institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford University Press.
Whitley, R., & Gläser, J. (Eds.). (2007). The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems (Vol. 26). Springer Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4
Woolley, R., Cañibano, C., & Tesch, J. (2016). A Functional Review of Literature on Research Careers.
https://www.ingenio.upv.es/sites/default/files/working-paper/2016-05.pdf
Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1188–1204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.012
Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business Research Methods, 7th Edn Mason. Ohio: Thomson South Western.
## Capitulo 2: Carreras cientificas
Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. (2017). The Interplay of Work and Family Trajectories over the Life Course: Germany and the United States in Comparison. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1448–1484.
https://doi.org/10.1086/691128
Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2013). Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 215–223.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt012
Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Career success in a boundaryless career world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.290
Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford University Press.
Auriol, L. (2013). Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers Núm. 2013/04; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Vol. 2013/04). https://doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxgs289w-en
Balsmeier, B., & Pellens, M. (2014). Who makes, who breaks: Which scientists stay in academe? Economics Letters, 122(2), 229–232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.11.033
Baruch, Y., & Hall, D. T. (2004). The academic career: A model for future careers in other sectors? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2), 241–262.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2002.11.002
Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I., & Burton, R. (2001). Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828026904
Bernardi, L., Huinink, J., & Settersten, R. A. (2019). The life course cube: A tool for studying lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 41, 100258.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004
Bernela, B. (2016). Géographie des carrières universitaires et construction des collaborations scientifiques: Une étude de cas en mathématiques. Géographie, économie, société, 18(2), 235–256.
https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.18.235-256
Black, G. C., & Stephan, P. E. (2010). The Economics of University Lab Science and the Role of Foreign Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars. En American universities in a global market (Ed.), American universities in a global market.
https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/american-universities-global-market/economics-university-science-and-role-foreign-graduate-students-and-postdoctoral-scholars
Bloch, C., Graversen, E. K., & Pedersen, H. S. (2014). Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance. Minerva, 52(1), 77–96.
Boardman, C., & Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: Cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 445–459.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9162-y
Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Role Strain in University Research Centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430–463.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0020
Boardman, P. C. (2009). Government centrality to university–industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy, 38(10), 1505–1516.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.008
Børing, P., Flanagan, K., Gagliardi, D., Kaloudis, A., & Karakasidou, A. (2015). International mobility: Findings from a survey of researchers in the EU. Science and Public Policy, scv006.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv006
Boulton, G. (2011). Harvesting Talent: Strengthening Research Careers in Europe. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 3–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.002
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2004). The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the University–Industry Research Revolution: A Brief History Featuring an Interview with Erich Bloch. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3/4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034128.39526.6b
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Academic Faculty in University Research Centers: Neither Capitalism’s Slaves nor Teaching Fugitives. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 88–120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777279
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer.
Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The “Publicness Puzzle” in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037204
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. (1990). The environments of U.S. R&D laboratories: Political and market influences. Policy Sciences, 23(1), 25–56.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136991
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 716.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007
Bozeman, B., & Ponomariov, B. (2009). Sector Switching from a Business to a Government Job: Fast-Track Career or Fast Track to Nowhere? Public Administration Review, 69(1), 77–91.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01942.x
Bozeman, B., & Rogers, J. D. (2002). A churn model of scientific knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy, 31(5), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00146-9
Cañibano, C., Fox, M. F., & Otamendi, F. J. (2016). Gender and patterns of temporary mobility among researchers. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv042
Cañibano, C., & Potts, J. (2019). Toward an evolutionary theory of human capital. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(3), 1017–1035.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0588-y
Cañibano, C., Woolley, R., Iversen, E. J., Hinze, S., Hornbostel, S., & Tesch, J. (2019). A conceptual framework for studying science research careers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1964–1992.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9659-3
Cañibano, C., Woolley, R., Iversen, E. J., Hinze, S., Hornbostel, S., & Tesch, J. (2019). A conceptual framework for studying science research careers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1964–1992.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9659-
Coberly, B. M., & Gray, D. O. (2010). Cooperative research centers and faculty satisfaction: A multi-level predictive analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 547–565.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9159-6
Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. Challenges to research universities, 171(200), 59.
Consoli, D., & Mina, A. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on health innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 297–319.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0127-3
Corona, S. (2021). Análisis de las dinámicas de producción de conocimiento científico bajo el sistema de evaluación de la calidad de la Educación Superior y la Ciencia. https://roderic.uv.es/bitstream/handle/10550/77921/TesisDoctoralCarmenCorona.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Crow, M. M., & Bozeman, B. L. (1987). A New Typology for R&D Laboratories: Implications for Policy Analysts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3324847
Dany, F., Louvel, S., & Valette, A. (2011). Academic careers: The limits of the ‘boundaryless approach’ and the power of promotion scripts. Human Relations, 64(7), 971–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710393537
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008
D’Onofrio, M. G., & Rogers, J. D. (2022). Key factors affecting the promotion of researchers of the Argentine Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). Research Evaluation, 31(2), 188–201.
Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2008). International scientist mobility and the locus of technology transfer. ZEW Discussion Papers.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6569246.pdf
Enders, J., & Kaulisch, M. (2006). The formative years of scholars: Proceedings from a symposium held at the Haga Forum, Stockholm, 9 - 11 November 2005 (U. Teichler, Ed.). Portland Press.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
European Commission. (2011). Towards a European framework for research careers. Directorate General for Research &. Innovation,. https://cdn5.euraxess.org/sites/default/files/policy_library/towards_a_european_framework_for_research_careers_final.pdf
Fernández-Zubieta, A., Geuna, A., & Lawson, C. (2015). What Do We Know of the Mobility of Research Scientists and Impact on Scientific Production. En Global Mobility of Research Scientists (pp. 1–33). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801396-0.00001-6
Fernández-Zubieta, A., Geuna, A., & Lawson, C. (2016). Productivity pay-offs from academic mobility: Should I stay or should I go? Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(1), 91–114.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv034
Fitzenberger, B., & Schulze, U. (2014). Up or Out: Research Incentives and Career Prospects of Postdocs in Germany. German Economic Review, 15(2), 287–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12010
Fox, M. F., & Stephan, P. E. (2001). Careers of Young Scientists: Preferences, Prospects and Realities by Gender and Field. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 109–122.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031001006
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign Born Scientists: Mobility Patterns for Sixteen Countries (Núm. w18067). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18067
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2014). The mover’s advantage: The superior performance of migrant scientists. Economics Letters, 122(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.10.040
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., & Diment, K. (2010). Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 527–546.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9139-x
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., & Diment, K. (2013). Careers and Organisational Objectives: Managing Competing Interests in Cooperative Research Centres. En C. Boardman, D. O. Gray, & D. Rivers (Eds.), Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation (pp. 79–110). Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4388-9_4
Gaughan, M. (2009). Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research evaluation, 18(2), 117–124.
Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2011). Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0011
Gaughan, M., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Science faculty at US research universities: The impacts of university research center-affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30(3), 215–222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.12.001
Gelijns, A., & Rosenberg, N. (1994). The Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine. Health Affairs, 13(3), 28–46.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.28
Gerpott, T. J., Domsch, M., & Keller, R. T. (1988). Career orientations in different countries and companies: An empirical investigation of West German, British and us industrial r&d professionals. Journal of Management Studies, 25(5), 439–462.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00709.x
Geuna, A., & Shibayama, S. (2015). Moving Out of Academic Research. En Global Mobility of Research Scientists (pp. 271–303). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801396-0.00010-7
Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Glaser, J. (2001). Macrostructures, careers and knowledge production: A neoinstitutionalist approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7–8), 698–715.
Gläser, J., Aljets, E., Lettkemann, E., & Laudel, G. (2014). Where to Go for a Change: The Impact of Authority Structures in Universities and Public Research Institutes on Changes of Research Practices. En R. Whitley & J. Gläser (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 42, pp. 297–329). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20140000042010
Godin, B. (2003). The impact of research grants on the productivity and quality of scientific research. Ottawa: INRS Working Paper, 2003.
Gray, D., Sundstrom, E., Tornatzky, L. G., & McGowen, L. (2011). When Triple Helix Unravels: A Multi-Case Analysis of Failures in Industry–University Cooperative Research Centres. Industry and Higher Education, 25(5), 333–345.
https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2011.0057
Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 113–136.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.270
Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760.
Jonkers, K. (2010). Mobility, migration, and the Chinese scientific research system. Routledge.
Kaulisch, M., & Salerno, C. (2005). Comparing academic career systems: The cases of Germany, England and US.
Keller, T. E., Collier, P. J., Blakeslee, J. E., Logan, K., McCracken, K., & Morris, C. (2014). Early Career Mentoring for Translational Researchers: Mentee Perspectives on Challenges and Issues. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 26(3), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883983
Khapova, S. N., & Arthur, M. B. (2011). Interdisciplinary approaches to contemporary career studies. Human Relations, 64(1), 3–17.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710384294
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). Pergamon international library of science, technology, engineering and social studies: The manufacture of knowledge. An essays on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon Press Oxford.
Lam, A. (2005). Work Roles and Careers of R&D Scientists in Network Organizations: Work Roles and Careers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 44(2), 242–275.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0019-8676.2005.00383.x
Lam, A. (2011). University-industry collaboration: Careers and knowledge governance in hybrid organisational space. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 2(1/2), 135.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSBA.2011.038137
Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2008). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of Early Career Researchers. Higher Education, 55(3), 387–406.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
Lawson, C., & Shibayama, S. (2014). Appointment, Promotion, and Mobility of Bioscience Researchers in Japan. En Global Mobility of Research Scientists (pp. 239–269). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801396-0.00009-0
Lawson, C., & Shibayama, S. (2015). International research visits and careers: An analysis of bioscience academics in Japan. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 690–710.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu084
Lee, H., Miozzo, M., & Laredo, P. (2010). Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Research Policy, 39(7), 869–881.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.001
Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132. JSTOR.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006790
Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ Industry Experience and Productivity in University–Industry Research Centers: A “Scientific and Technical Human Capital” Explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269–290.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6111-2
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Universities as partners in U.S. research joint ventures. Research Policy, 34(3), 385–393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.013
Mahroum, S. (2000). Scientific Mobility: An Agent of Scientific Expansion and Institutional Empowerment. Science Communication, 21(4), 367–378.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547000021004003
Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD. Research Policy, 29(6), 741–756.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00047-5
Merton, R. K. (1973). Sociology of Science. RAWAT.
Miller, J. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2014). The sorcerer’s postdoc apprentice: Uncertain funding and contingent highly skilled labour. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 289–305.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu003
Moed, H. F., Aisati, M., & Plume, A. (2013). Studying scientific migration in Scopus. Scientometrics, 94(3), 929–942.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0783-9
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0
Murray, F. (2010). The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 341–388.
https://doi.org/10.1086/653599
Nelson, R. R., Buterbaugh, K., Perl, M., & Gelijns, A. (2011). How medical know-how progresses. Research Policy, 40(10), 1339–1344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.014
OECD. (2010). Measuring Innovation.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264059474-en
OECD. (2013). La medición de la innovación.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264177796-es
OECD. (2015). Manual de Frascati 2015.
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264310681-es
Pedersen, H. S. (2014). New doctoral graduates in the knowledge economy: Trends and key issues. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(6), 632–645.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.957891
Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in Organizations, Revised Edition.
Ponomariov, B., & Craig Boardman, P. (2008). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301–313.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9029-z
Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013
Ryazanova, O., & McNamara, P. (2019). Choices and Consequences: Impact of Mobility on Research-Career Capital and Promotion in Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(2), 186–212.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0389
Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36307.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307
Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2014). Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’ preferences for publishing in industrial employment. Research Policy, 43(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.006
Sauermann, H., & Stephan, P. E. (2012). Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1946768
Steele, M. M., Fisman, S., & Davidson, B. (2013). Mentoring and role models in recruitment and retention: A study of junior medical faculty perceptions. Medical Teacher, 35(5), e1130–e1138.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.735382
Stephan, P. (2008). Job Market Effects on Scientific Productivity. Conferences on New Political Economy, 25(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1628/186183408785112368https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1946768
Stephan, P. E. (2010). The Economics of Science. En Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 217–273). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01005-1
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1997). The Critical Importance of Careers in Collaborative Scientific Research. Revue d’économie industrielle, 79(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.1997.1652
Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (The Brookings Institution, Washington DC).
Sumell, A. J., Stephan, P. E., & Adams, J. D. (2009). Capturing knowledge: The location decision of new Ph. Ds working in industry. En Science and engineering careers in the United States: An analysis of markets and employment (pp. 257–287). University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11624/c11624.pdf
Thomas, P. A., Diener-West, M., Canto, M. I., Martin, D. R., Post, W. S., & Streiff, M. B. (2004). Results of an Academic Promotion and Career Path Survey of Faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine: Academic Medicine, 79(3), 258–264.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200403000-00013
Veugelers, R., & Van Bouwel, L. (2015). The Effects of International Mobility on European Researchers: Comparing Intra-EU and U.S. Mobility. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 360–377.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9347-6
Vinck, D. (2007). Sciences et société: Sociologie du travail scientifique (Éd. entièrement refondue). A. Colin.
Vinck, D. (2014a). Ciencias y sociedad: Sociología del trabajo científico (Primera edición). gedisa editorial.
Vinck, D. (2014b). MAPPING THE POPULATION, CAREERS, MOBILITIES AND IMPACTS OF ADVANCED DEGREE GRADUATES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES (POCARIM).
https://documents.pub/document/mapping-the-population-careers-mobilities-and-impacts-mapping-the-population.html
Vinkenburg, C. J., Connolly, S., Fuchs, S., Herschberg, C., & Schels, B. (2020). Mapping career patterns in research: A sequence analysis of career histories of ERC applicants. PLOS ONE, 15(7).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236252
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
Walsh, J. P., & Lee, Y.-N. (2015). The bureaucratization of science. Research Policy, 44(8), 1584–1600.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.010
Whitley, R., Glaser, J., & Engwall, L. (2010). Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford University Press.
http://site.ebrary.com/id/10416911
Woolley, R., Cañibano, C., & Tesch, J. (2016). A Functional Review of Literature on Research Careers.
https://www.ingenio.upv.es/sites/default/files/working-paper/2016-05.pdf
Ziman, J. M. (1994). Prometheus bound: Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge University Press.
Zucker, L., & Darby, M. (2006). Movement of Star Scientists and Engineers and High-Tech Firm Entry (Núm. w12172; p. w12172). National Bureau of Economic Research.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w12172
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Torero, M. (2002). Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 629–660.
https://doi.org/10.1086/339613
Google Drive
Gist
Clipboard
Sign in with Wallet
