MDEF: Measuring the world / A world in data activity report.
Purple Team: Seher, Dhriti, Myrto, Samantha, Carolina, Wen, Jimena
Journal Index
Brainstorming process:
Objective: We want spaces to encourage curiosity and consenquently creativity.
Question: How is curiosity triggered?
Curious responses are influenced by the physical environment.
Post multiple images about the tool. What tool did you use? Would you choose a different tool now?(max 280 char)
We choose the camera.
How can others replicate your data capturing process again?
–
Our plan was to assemble a camera on the IAAC terrace, but the only day we had to gather data turned out a very rainy day. Therefore we had to reconsider the spots where we would place the cameras in a strategic way, so we can later compare the results in relation to the context. Next to the camera we have a QR code. The purpose of this is to see how many people are willing to discover what the camera is doing and why. The camera will film the people that were curious enough to scan the code. To trigger this we used a catchy phrase: "What are you looking at?".
Data Capture: IAAC Main Hall
By scanning the QR code we have a little surprise:
For using the Raspberry Pi camera:
For using the smartphones as cameras:
Prototype
Final stand (at IACC main hall, Itnig Cafe, IAAC Atelier)
We designed a cardboard stand and printed A4 papers with different messages to spark curiosity in spaces of human transit.
Data Capture: Itnig
After an hour at IAAC Main Hall, we were not receiving much interaction. We updated our sign and QR code with "free compliment" because we thought it could be more engaging. We moved our next prototype to Itnig because there would be more movement of people.
The QR code this time led to a compliment generator site called emergency compliments.
2:40 - 3:40 PM - Itnig café
We set up a cardboard right next to the coffee check out area at Itnig for 1 full hour. We recorded a timelapse video of the hour and also tracked the QR scans. It seemed an integrated experience with the coffee service since they were giving out free treats that same day.
Data Capture: Atelier IAAC
4:50 - 5:10 PM - Atelier IAAC
Next we tested a different environment, going to IAAC Atelier to test a private space. This time we had the sign have a riddle that we hoped could prompt curiosity. We placed our sign in the stairwell because it had the most traffic and movement of people. Our riddle asked: "What color is the wind?"
The QR code this time led to a figma page we generated for the answer to the riddle.
7:30 - 8:30 PM - Micampus Residence corridor
9:00 - 11:30 PM - Micampus Residence elevator
There is something weird about having a camera in an elevator so we decided not to place one, but just place the cardboard. Since they are in an enclosed space, they check their phone or just stand in silence in the elevator - to pass that time, we got a lot of scans from this location.
How do you combine the tool provided with your creativity to prove your hypothesis? How long did you capture data?
Describe the raw data you collected by posting a sample i.e. a picture, a screen capture, etc.
For our QR codes, we used a generator from qr.io.com- which let us track the number of scans. QR code data sampling example:
Joke QR data: 2 scans, 30 minutes
https://qr.io/public-stats/G6BiFX
Free compliment QR data: 10 scans, 1 hour
https://qr.io/public-stats/2zdiLH
Explain one or more mistakes you've done during that phase? What would you change if will do it again? (max. 560 char)
First Experiment: Itnig
Second Experiment: IAAC Atelier staircases
Images of people scanning the QR code:
To compare the results effectively, we will be measuring the Rate of Scans (ROS) for our prototype in the two venues.
Rate of Scans (ROS) = Number of Scans (S) / 30 minutes (t)
Data Summary | ROS (S/t) |
---|---|
Itnig Cafe | 5 S/t |
Iaac Atelier Staircase | 2 S/t |
The ROS of Itnig (5 S/t) is higher than the ROS in Iaac Atelier Staircase (2 S/t). This validate our inference where people tend to be more curious when they feel bored, for example waitng for a coffee compared to when they are in the process of transitioning in between spaces.
Boredom leads to more curious people: waiting in line and being in the elevator. In these spaces people had more time to be more aware of their surrounds and engage with the QR code and sign.
Post at least two images of a chart, a screen-shoot of your data, that you used to prove if your hypothesis is false.
Data Summary | |
---|---|
Project Title | Curious Triggers - Itnig Cafe |
Capture Start | 2:40PM, 09-02-2023 |
Capture End | 09-02-2023 |
Original Data Format | Film |
Submitted format | .MOV file and Analytics tracking |
Total Data Points | 12 clicks on QR |
Number of datasets | 1 |
Data Repository | https://qr.io/public-stats/2zdiLH |
Data Summary | |
---|---|
Project Title | Curious Triggers - IAAC Atelier staircase |
Capture Start | 5:00PM, 09-02-2023 |
Capture End | 5:30 PM, 09-02-2023 |
Original Data Format | Film |
Submitted format | .MOV file and Analytics tracking |
Total Data Points | 5 clicks on QR |
Number of datasets | 1 |
Data Repository | https://qr.io/public-stats/G6BiFX |
Data Summary | |
---|---|
Project Title | Curious Triggers - Micampus Elevator |
Capture Start | 9:00 PM, 09-02-2023 |
Capture End | 11:30 PM, 09-02-2023 |
Original Data Format | _ |
Submitted format | _ |
Total Data Points | 21 clicks on QR |
Number of datasets | 1 |
Data Repository | https://qr.io/public-stats/G6BiFX |
We started to question QR codes, and how we have a blind trust towards them. Because of the abstract shape of the QR code, the link is hidden and could easily be a scam. We trust QR codes to give us information, but what happens on the other side?
Going through our timelapse capture and being on the otherside of the camera showed how easy it is to invade privacy and how much we are being watched without consent. It felt very creepy invading people's privacy and made us aware of all the cameras around us on a dialy basis.
Explain one or more mistakes you've done during that phase? What would you change if will do it again? What if you will have more time? (max 560 char)
Curiosity is a complex subject to explore, so it is best to have a specific way to measure this. To include data scraping methods of data collection, we would look at Twitter data scraping segmenting Barcelona geographically.
Some ideas we wanted to explore:
We also did some research on curiosity and found some helpful resources. There are 5 distinct factors or dimensions of curiosity:
The 4 curiosity profiles
Further, the study found that from these dimensions, four profiles – or types of curious people – emerged:
As a group, we think the fascinated is the main user profile that in our targeted places.
Quite often, businesses monetise on our human instinct of being curious. For example, companies that hand out free-(1) scratch cards that you scratch out with a key in the hopes of winnning something for free. Another common example would be our curiosity to know what toy is inside the (2) 'kinder-joy' chocolate egg. (3) A man named Peter Molneux, the man responsible for the Fable game series, created a mysterious social experiment mobile game, 'Curiosity: What's Inside The Cube?' with a lifechanging prize. Thousands of people played this game and spent hours on it to know what was inside the cube. After 6 months, 2000 layers later, the centre of the cube was revealed to the one lucky winner of the game. This is a perfect example of how one can trigger curiosity.
To further our research on curiosity and what kind of spaces can enhance it one could use the Experience Sampling Method. The Experience Sampling Method is a research method that probes participants to report on their thoughts or feelings on multiple occasions over time. This Method has been used to measure boredom trough smart.
2020, Fernandes et al. "Machine Learning approach to boredom detection using smartphone sensors"
We used 4 different locations and boredom as a medium to reach a curious response. We used the proneness of people towards boredom to trigger a sense of curiosity. But we did feel like it was very diffcult to measure such an abstract concept. The more curious people were the more scans we got.
A big take away from this exercise was the surveillance aspect of it all. People were being recorded without consent and scanning QR codes without knowing their content. If we were to do it again, we would have to be more concious of people's privacy and transparency.