# Local Chapters Congress During State of the Map 2019, the Local Chapters Congress was on the official schedule for the first time. We had a very high participation: there were people from 22 different countries, with people from 6+1 official Local Chapters. The informal organisation, combined with so many people, made for a somewhat chaotic meeting. Some of the notes we took during the meeting are below ## Why Local Chapters? These are things participants said about the value of having a Local Chapter: * make sure there are no local hi-jackers of the brand * broaden the visibility of OSM(F) * Give a counter weight on the OSMF [advisory board](https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board) to corporate members * Local point of contact for Organisations/Governments in reference to open data. Organisations prefer to talk to organisations. * Communicate what is happening in the OSM universe to the local mappers * Be the organiser of meetups, seminars and country SOTMs * Be a contact point/coordination point for bulk uploads ~~* Profit V not-for-profit~~ (note: scratched out because I don't know what it means) ## Criteria for LC The Board started a conversation about the minimum criteria for Local Chapters not long before SotM. We chatted about this too. * We made it clear that it does not have to be limited by international or ethnic boundaries * The organization should be bigger than its people. This means that we should expect Local Chapters to be more permanent than the people running them at this time. * But the current high threshold makes for a percieved need to have some status for "User Groups" - whether or not those would need to have Board approval is an open question ## Mutual help / common issues Local Chapters operate in a diversity of national legal frameworks and cultural contexts. Still there are recurring issues, which means we can learn from each other. This is part of the reason for the re-launch of the LCWG as the Local Chapters and Communities Working Group ([LCCWG](https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_Chapters_Working_Group)). There are of course other ways too, to keep the communication channels open. Sepcific topics were: * finding a fitting structure for the chapter * Guidance on subgroups reporting to the LC * complying with trademark regulations * Child protection policy, or policy guideline from OSMF (since each chapter will have different national laws) ## Raw notes below # Present * Wikimedia Italia (LC) * OSM-US * OSM-Japan * OSM-UK (LC) * OSM Belgium (LC) * Brasil * FLOSS Kosovo * OSM DRC * OSM Spain * OSM Ireland (applied to LC) * Turkey * OSGEO Oceania * FOSSGIS (LC) * OSM Uganda / OSM Africa * Philippines * OSM Mali * OSM France (LC) * Croatia * OSM Indonesia * China * Swiss OpenStreetMap Association (LC) * Canada 22! ## What is new since last year? * renewed interest * relaunch of LCWG as Local chapters & Communities Working Group * Local Chapters Congress in the official SotM program ## Why Local Chapters? * make sure there are no local hi-jackers of the brand * Broaden the visibility of OSM(F) * Give a counter weight on the OSMF advisory board to corporate members * Local point of contact for Organisations/Governments in reference to open data * Communicate what is happening in the OSM universe * Be the organiser of meetups, seminars and country SOTMs * Be a contact point/coordination point for bulk uploads * Profit V not-for-profit ## Pending applications * Ireland * ## Role of LC in the OSMF? ## Criteria for LC * Does not have to be limited by international or ethnic boundaries, clearer idea of a community being diverse * The organization should be bigger than its people * but maybe we need a LC-light status? * New status "User Group" * Board approval? ## Mutual help / common issues * keep communication channels open * finding a fitting structure for the chapter * Guidance on subgroups reporting to the LC * complying with trademark regulations * Child protection policy, or policy guideline from OSMF (since each chapter will have different national laws)