**Cosmos Hub** https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/79 - Voted YES. Relatively small funding ask for regulation representation of Cosmos Hub in Europe. https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/80 - Voted NWV. Spam proposal, front running a proposal not yet on chain. https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/81 - Voted NWV. Was not discussed with community and was rushed through in 8 hours to also front run a proposal. Also makes it impossible to reconcile parameter adjustment updates w/ signaling proposal, and could result in a chain halt as a result. https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/82 - Soft YES, right now. General plan seems worth looking into for ATOM to accrue value. 4M initial mint, down from 60m. Listened to community input, and will now be implementing a “SubDAO” like structure for councils where chain can veto council at any time or dissolve it. https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/83 - Voted soft NWV. May change to No (as I’m not 100% certain now that it’s in alignment with our vote on Prop 75) It’s basically a repeat on 81 and is bordering on spamming the gov’n module again to frontrun the vote on ATOM 2.0 and create confusion. **JUNO** https://www.mintscan.io/juno/proposals/44 - Voted YES. Regular course of business - ensuring max gas isn't too high and there's no crazy contracts launching that take forever to execute. https://www.mintscan.io/juno/proposals/47 - Voted YES. Also regular business - new network upgrade.