Mulaik, S. A. (1986). Factor analysis and Psychometrika: Major developments. Psychometrika, 51(1), 23-33.
Mulaik, S. A. (1987). A brief history of the philosophical foundations of exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22(3), 267-305.
Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Foundations of factor analysis. NW: CRC press.
Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. NW:CRC press.
教育博一 蔡介文 109152512
Philosophy (1/8) Greek philosophers
Greek rationalist and atomists - appearance is to be explained by something not observed.
Aristotle - induction (歸納) and seeking common features of things to explain them.
Aristotle: syllogistic deduction (三段論)
Hence he believed that in trying to explain something, one must demonstrate that out of which it was made (material cause), the essential features of its form (formal cause), the agent that brought about that form (efficient cause), and the end (or final form) toward which the object's form was directed (final cause).
Philosophy (2/8) Bacon and auto methods
Bacon - auto algorithm for inductively discovering common cause.
syllogistic logistic (三段論) as a fruitless enterprise.
Bacon proposed a "new" method of induction that would begin without hypotheses or speculations and move to more general truths through an automatic procedure or algorithm.
Philosophy (3/8) Descartes and universal methods
Descartes (笛卡爾) - (1) orthogonal or linearly independent factors, (2) reproducing the corr matrix from the factors.
Kant - not to discard inductive inferences but to treat them as hypotheses that must test against additional data to establish objectivity.
And so, the conclusions of exploratory factor analyses are never complete without a subsequent confirmatory analysis with additional variables and new data.
Philosophy (5/8) British scientists
Galton - regression,
Pearson - correlation
Philosophy (6/8) Spearman and common factor analysis
British empiricist (Galton, Pearson, Yule) - exploratory, descriptive methods.
the inductivist fallacy (歸納謬誤)- factor analysis can not yield unique and unambiguous knowledge w/o prior assumption. —> factor indeterminacy (因素不確定性)
two-factor” (general and specific factors) theory
the first common-factor-analysis model
\[Y_j = a_j G + \Psi_j\]
Philosophy (7/8) Thurstone and simple structure
simple structure
Search for factors related to the observed variables so that each factor pertained as much as possible to one non-overlapping subset of the observed variables.
Method of multiple-factor analysis. By this time, the latent-ability variables had come to be called “factors” owing to the usage of Spearman (1927).
–
A graphic representation of the 3 oblique factors from the Thurstone data using fa.diagram. Factors were transformed to an oblique solution using oblimin.
Philosophy (8/8) Factor Indeterminancy
It is hard to avoid indeterminacy even after factor rotations and loadings are defined. Cuz the interpretation process is inductive, and data are not the only thing for determining inductive inferences. ()
Methodology (1/6) Factor extraction
centroid method
Until the advent of computers made the principal-axes method of factoring the preferred method, the centroid method was the most frequently used for extracting the factors. –- Burt , Thurstone (1947)
The centroid method seeks to find a variable that is an unweighted composite of the residual variables after previous factors have been extracted.
principal axes
finding that particular combination of weights which, when applied to the scores of the tests in the test battery, determines the most representative single score. The solution of this kind of problem is the essence of the principal-axes methods of factoring.
Methodology (2/6) Rotation methods
promax
after computer
varimax ()
oblimax ()
Methodology (3/6) Numereical methods
aftrer computer
eigenvalues and eigenvectors
derivatives of matrix
MLE for factor analysis
Methodology (4/6) Confirmatory methods
A primitive form of confirmatory factor analysis is multiple-group factor analysis.(但沒有受到重視) –> 最早這是一種 factor extration 的方法。
早期 Thurstone (1944)、Guttman (1952)等提出的 multiple group method (一種處理相關矩陣的方法)。
“Group” here refers to “group factor” and not to “group of subjects.”
Thurstone (1945) The result of this method of factoring is a factor matrixF which satisfies the fundamental relation \(FF'=R\).
這是一種 principal-axes solution(cited from Thurstone, 1944)
1960s 之後轉為流行 eigenvectors 與 eigenvalue 的作法。
Methodology (5/6) Confirmatory methods
exploratory factor analysis, which may be regarded as an “abductive,” “hypothesis-generating” methodology
0412 factor nalysis Mulaik, S. A. (1986). Factor analysis and Psychometrika: Major developments. Psychometrika, 51 (1), 23-33. Mulaik, S. A. (1987). A brief history of the philosophical foundations of exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22 (3), 267-305. Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Foundations of factor analysis . NW: CRC press. Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations . NW:CRC press. 教育博一 蔡介文 109152512
{"metaMigratedAt":"2023-06-15T22:40:47.966Z","metaMigratedFrom":"YAML","title":"0412 factor nalysis","breaks":true,"description":"View the slide with \"Slide Mode\".","slideOptions":"{\"theme\":\"white\",\"center\":false}","contributors":"[{\"id\":\"c9d2ebfb-a57b-4302-a46c-9d939ae4966f\",\"add\":9770,\"del\":8285}]"}