Electra leftovers and action items

EIP-7742
- Desirable for Pectra as then PeerDAS rollout will not require an EL change
- Adding target to the EL block header doesn't make much sense without changing the fee market as the existing fee calculation would work only if TARGET = MAX / 2
- Ansgar and Gajinder to come up with the fee market proposal till the end of the next week. The final decision to be made on the next ACDC (Nov 28); ship without 7742 if there is no concensus around the proposed change on the ACDC
Updating TARGET/MAX to 4/6 by bumping the parameters is also considered
- One of the concerns is that it will delay Pectra
- Another concern is related to syncing the chain under non-finality
  - Non-finality devnets to run with TARGET/MAX = 5/10 or even more aggressive numbers
CL devs to review and approve https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3998
- Let's merge!
- Etan to update block_hash computation to align CL tests with this change
Take a look at https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3885
- Review, approve, merge
Finish and merge https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/4002
Also discussed LC changes that aren't related to the core protocol and can be done regardless of Pectra
- https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3553
- Etan to open a PR on fix on the Light client sync security
Deposit stress test (with new validator deposits) on devnet-5
Devnet 5 after EIP-7742 settles down