日置玲於奈

@leonahioki

Joined on Mar 31, 2022

  • Leona Hioki, Erik Rybakken, Yutaka Hashimoto Abstract We introduce a new kind of blockchain scaling solution, which can be classified as a kind of Plasma, but without the online requirement of users. Our design satisfies the following requirements: O(1) state growth per block relative to the number of users if no withdrawal is made No need for channels or individual liquidity preparations between receivers and the hub Elimination of online requirements for general users except during sending and receiving (No need of watch tower) Onchain privacy
     Like 2 Bookmark
  • We offer rewards to those who discover errors at the concept level in this architecture. Please help us identify potential accidents or attack vectors. The period Until 15.04.2024 12pm CET How to participate it? Please report an error in that forum. Regarding the questions about the protocol, we can answer to these ASAP in the forum as well. Reward
     Like  Bookmark
  • Intmax is the part of the Ethereum, which makes Ethereum blockchain the scalable and global payment/token transfer system. Ether, tokenized BTC, and stable coins will be available for payments among all kinds of Internet users neverthless the economy gaps and lack of public safety of inhabitants. NFTs will be a social protocol as this provides privacy and near zero gas cost. We truely believe that Intmax will play the important role in the Cryptocurrency space. User Distribution and Token Distribution As a decentralized and public token transfer system, this project is not company-driven but community driven. We need to keep eye on establishing both liberty and fairness. The our economic approach is oriented to Left-wing capitalism, where the central power is minimized and all kind of people have benefits from the social system. Protocol is not owned by a company, and the driving community should be distributed to various type of people.
     Like  Bookmark
  • Q1: What does this differ from calldata solutions like Validium? A: Totally different. Intmax is zkRollup. In Validium, a Data Availability attack leads to the loss of users' funds. So it affects safety. In Intmax's approach, the Data Availability attack never leads to the loss of user's funds and is only limited to the necessity of exit. Q2: What is the difference from Adamantium? A: First of all, Adamantium is the first post about combining zkRollup and online communications. Starkware is the first pioneer to try this. The differences are (1) In Adamantium and Springrollup, the protective withdrawal and force withdrawal are independently simple and elegant ideas. Users' funds get withdrawn to Layer1 with protective withdrawal or requests recorded on Layer1 when they have communication troubles with the aggregators for a relatively long term. However, using Layer1 is expensive, and bridging funds back and forth is not good usability. Since the communication problem can unintentionally happen, the costs of a solution should be minimized. Intmax found a way to cancel a tx.
     Like  Bookmark
  • The purpose of this document is to help you understand the use cases of the Verifiable Back-end (VBE) built on the Intmax project by explaining its benefits and providing concrete examples. 1. Pros/Cons VBE has the following advantages The execution of the Back-end and the resulting display on the front end are verifiable and traceable. It does not invade privacy because it is a communication with the host. The HTML generated as a result of Back-end execution is reliably displayed if it’s without browser intervention. Back-end logic is owner-defined in an L2 database that borrows the censorship resistance and security of Ethereum, and ownership transfers and code changes run in governance directly based on Ethereum’s security.
     Like  Bookmark