There is no commentSelect some text and then click Comment, or simply add a comment to this page from below to start a discussion.
Lecture 3: Separability of , Projections, Weierstrass Theorem
tags: 224a
In the last lecture we showed that a Hilbert space is separable if and only if it has a countable basis (indeed, these two terms are often used interchangeably). We will now show that the examples we looked at are separable.
It is easy to see that is separable: the set consisting of standard basis vectors is clearly orthonormal and complete in the appropriate inner product.
It is less clear why a space of functions defined on a continuous domain would be separable, and showing this is nontrivial. Let denote the vector space of real valued continuous functions on and let denote the subspace of polynomial functions (these are not Hilbert spaces because they are not complete). Then we have the inclusions: as subspaces. The key is that both of these inclusions are dense in the norm; the first one is implied by the Weierstrass Approximation Theorem:
Theorem 1. Suppose and . Then there is a polynomial such that uniformly on . Since the uniform approximation above implies closeness in , the first inclusion follows. We will prove this theorem later in the lecture.
The second inclusion follows straightforwardly from the definition of the Lebesgue integral and measurable functions; the interested reader can consult Reed and Solomon exercise II.2.
We can now see that is separable: let be an enumeration of all polynomials with rational coefficients, viewed as elements of . Then for every , one can find , and satisfying all in the norm. Thus ; since is countable we are done.
To see that is separable, let be a countable dense subset of for every , and set . For and choose large enough so that 𝟙, where 𝟙 is an indicator function (such an exists because the integral is finite). Then choose with 𝟙.
Separability has an important conceptual consequence: every separable Hilbert space is *ismorphic to , in the sense that the linear map defined by where is an ONB of is a Hilbert space isomorphism, i.e., for every . Thus, every infinite dimensional countable Hilbert space is "the same" (in fact, early texts on the subject referred to it as "the" Hilbert space). The finite dimensional ones are all isomorphic to or by elementary linear algebra.
We will henceforth assume all Hilbert spaces being discussed are separable, without mention.
Explicit Bases
The reason we talk about "different" Hilbert spaces in practice is that the choice of basis makes a big difference with regards to understanding the structure of the space. The "generic" bases arising from separability are not very useful, and we now describe some more interesting bases.
Legendre Polynomials. The set of monomials is complete in , i.e., if for every then for every . To see this, note that implies for every , which by the Weierstrass theorem gives . Thus, we can apply Gram-Schmidt to the set of monomials (with respect to the inner product) to obtain a set of orthogonal polynomials which are an ONB for . These particular polynomials are called Legendre polynomials (up to constant multiples; the traditional normalization does not take them to be unit vectors) and have many other nice properties which we will discuss later in the course. They also come up in physics when solving Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates.
Fourier Series. Another good basis for is given by the exponential functions ; convergence of Fourier series in (a fact which we will not prove, though a proof is outlined in Reed and Simon II.8-9) implies that in , for every .
Hermite Functions. The harmonic oscillator wavefunctions, i.e., the set of solutions to form an orthonormal basis of . We may prove this later in the course. These functions are (up to constants) Hermite polynomials multiplied by a Gaussian.
The point is that a lot of good bases come from differential equations arising in physics. Later on, we will also consider questions like: how fast do the coefficients in the generalized Fourier expansions corresponding to these bases decay?
Closed Subspaces and Projections
The subspaces in the previous sections are vector spaces, but they are not Hilbert spaces because they are not closed under taking limits; they are examples of dense subspaces.
Definition. A closed subspace of a Hilbert space is a subspace which is closed under taking limits with respect to . The orthogonal complement of a subspace is defined as: It is easy to check that the orthogonal complement of a subspace (closed or not) is closed.
Closed subspaces are Hilbert spaces in their own right, and satisfy the following important theorem. Theorem 2. If is a closed subspace of , then every vector can be uniquely decomposed as where and . Proof. Since is a separable Hilbert space, it has an ONB . Let noting that the sum converges in by Bessel's inequality, and since is complete. We now have by Parseval. Thus . To see uniqueness, observe that for any implies that and have the same Fourier coefficients with respect to , which means they are equal.
It can be easily shown using calculus that is the point in minimizing . One pleasing application of this is that Hilbert space theory gives an algorithm for finding the best low degree polynomial approximation to a given function in the norm: simply compute the first few Legendre coefficients by integration, and output the corresponding sum of Legendre polynomials.
Remark A closed subspace of a Banach space is complemented if there is another subspace such that every can be uniquely decomposed as with ; this is denoted . We have just shown that every closed subspace of a Hilbert space is complented. IT can be shown that Hilbert space is the only Banach space with this property.
A linear functional on is a linear map . The norm of a linear functional is and it is called bounded if it has finite norm. Proposition. A linear function is continuous (with respect to convergence in ) if and only if it is bounded. (proof on the homework)
Note that whenever we mention linear functions that are continuous, we must be mindful of which notion of convergence they are continuous with respect to; we will consider various other notions later in the course. Though we will not explicitly mention topological spaces, they are essentially an abstract way of specifying a notion of convergence.
The set of bounded linear functions on forms a vector space with respect to pointwise addition and multiplication, caled the dual space . In fact, there is an isometry (norm-preserving bijection) between and .
Theorem.(Riesz-Fisher) For every there is a unique such that for all . This map is an isometry, i.e., a bijection satisfying .
The proof is given in Reed and Simon Theorem II.4. In particular, this implies that is also a Hilbert space.