KCL e-Research
      • Sharing URL Link copied
      • /edit
      • View mode
        • Edit mode
        • View mode
        • Book mode
        • Slide mode
        Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
      • Customize slides
      • Note Permission
      • Read
        • Owners
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Owners Signed-in users Everyone
      • Write
        • Owners
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Owners Signed-in users Everyone
      • Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
    • Invite by email
      Invitee

      This note has no invitees

    • Publish Note

      Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note

      Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
      Your note is now live.
      This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
      Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.
      See published notes
      Unpublish note
      Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
      View profile
    • Commenting
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
    • Suggest edit
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
    • Emoji Reply
    • Enable
    • Versions and GitHub Sync
    • Note settings
    • Note Insights New
    • Engagement control
    • Make a copy
    • Transfer ownership
    • Delete this note
    • Insert from template
    • Import from
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
      • Clipboard
    • Export to
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
    • Download
      • Markdown
      • HTML
      • Raw HTML
Menu Note settings Note Insights Versions and GitHub Sync Sharing URL Help
Menu
Options
Engagement control Make a copy Transfer ownership Delete this note
Import from
Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
Export to
Dropbox Google Drive Gist
Download
Markdown HTML Raw HTML
Back
Sharing URL Link copied
/edit
View mode
  • Edit mode
  • View mode
  • Book mode
  • Slide mode
Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
Customize slides
Note Permission
Read
Owners
  • Owners
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Owners Signed-in users Everyone
Write
Owners
  • Owners
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Owners Signed-in users Everyone
Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
  • Invite by email
    Invitee

    This note has no invitees

  • Publish Note

    Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note

    Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
    Your note is now live.
    This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
    Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.
    See published notes
    Unpublish note
    Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
    View profile
    Engagement control
    Commenting
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    • Everyone
    Suggest edit
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    Emoji Reply
    Enable
    Import from Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
       Owned this note    Owned this note      
    Published Linked with GitHub
    • Any changes
      Be notified of any changes
    • Mention me
      Be notified of mention me
    • Unsubscribe
    # HPC Storage Benchmark for Ling and Grigorios ## Conclusions - text suggested for paper > These algorithm benchmarks were collected on the CREATE HPC cluster at King's College London using the scratch storage filesystem. This filesystem uses the Ceph distributed storage system across a large number of storage nodes with diverse disk types and properties. > > The CREATE HPC scratch storage in file access benchmarks was found to have a throughput of 645MiB/s sequential read (1179MiB/s for cached files) and a random read latency of 37.8 ms (sdev 51.4 ms) or 12.9 ms (sdev 39.1 ms) for cached files. > > Sequential write throughput was 494MiB/s with a random write latency of 48.1 ms (sdev 86.4 ms). > > These storage benchmarks were performed during a period of low usage and were found to be subject to occasional degradation due to factors out of our control within the HPC cluster and its Ceph storage cluster. ## Notes Results of tests were surprisingly consistent, though affected by occasional degradations in performance, presumably due to Ceph doing some background task. How to acknowledge CREATE in papers: https://docs.er.kcl.ac.uk/CREATE/acknowledging/ ## Tests Fio jobfiles mostly as presented at https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Block/References/samplefiocommandslinux.htm ### Case 1 - sequential read Jobfile ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=4 name=raw-read rw=read size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Result 1 - Saturday 8th Feb, lunchtime ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1179MiB/s][r=4716 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=63081: Sat Feb 8 13:38:22 2025 read: IOPS=4553, BW=1138MiB/s (1194MB/s)(134GiB/120082msec) slat (usec): min=51, max=681009, avg=191.42, stdev=1836.70 clat (usec): min=1722, max=1657.6k, avg=56007.98, stdev=67410.10 lat (usec): min=1912, max=1657.8k, avg=56199.64, stdev=67428.38 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 8], 10.00th=[ 9], 20.00th=[ 13], | 30.00th=[ 18], 40.00th=[ 25], 50.00th=[ 34], 60.00th=[ 45], | 70.00th=[ 62], 80.00th=[ 87], 90.00th=[ 129], 95.00th=[ 174], | 99.00th=[ 321], 99.50th=[ 388], 99.90th=[ 709], 99.95th=[ 827], | 99.99th=[ 927] bw ( MiB/s): min= 41, max= 1524, per=100.00%, avg=1138.97, stdev=50.96, samples=960 iops : min= 166, max= 6096, avg=4555.70, stdev=203.84, samples=960 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.21%, 10=12.49%, 20=21.22%, 50=29.41% lat (msec) : 100=20.72%, 250=13.94%, 500=1.81%, 750=0.11%, 1000=0.07% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01% cpu : usr=0.81%, sys=22.25%, ctx=449921, majf=0, minf=50116 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=546846,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1138MiB/s (1194MB/s), 1138MiB/s-1138MiB/s (1194MB/s-1194MB/s), io=134GiB (143GB), run=120082-120082msec ``` Result 2 - Sunday 9th Feb, lunchtime ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1178MiB/s][r=4712 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=234023: Sun Feb 9 12:41:20 2025 read: IOPS=4333, BW=1083MiB/s (1136MB/s)(127GiB/120201msec) slat (usec): min=52, max=245760, avg=226.45, stdev=2547.87 clat (usec): min=1872, max=5552.0k, avg=58802.42, stdev=127502.23 lat (msec): min=2, max=5552, avg=59.03, stdev=128.28 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 8], 10.00th=[ 9], 20.00th=[ 13], | 30.00th=[ 17], 40.00th=[ 23], 50.00th=[ 32], 60.00th=[ 44], | 70.00th=[ 61], 80.00th=[ 86], 90.00th=[ 129], 95.00th=[ 178], | 99.00th=[ 355], 99.50th=[ 477], 99.90th=[ 1133], 99.95th=[ 2601], | 99.99th=[ 5201] bw ( MiB/s): min= 6, max= 1684, per=100.00%, avg=1085.00, stdev=79.24, samples=959 iops : min= 24, max= 6736, avg=4339.99, stdev=316.95, samples=959 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.16%, 10=13.44%, 20=22.32%, 50=28.50% lat (msec) : 100=19.75%, 250=13.56%, 500=1.83%, 750=0.21%, 1000=0.11% lat (msec) : 2000=0.07%, >=2000=0.06% cpu : usr=0.77%, sys=21.26%, ctx=427902, majf=0, minf=59291 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=520918,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1083MiB/s (1136MB/s), 1083MiB/s-1083MiB/s (1136MB/s-1136MB/s), io=127GiB (137GB), run=120201-120201msec ``` ### Case 2 - sequential read, 1M block size Jobfile ``` [global] bs=1M iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=4 name=raw-read rw=read size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Output 1 - Sunday lunchtime ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1175MiB/s][r=1175 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=234155: Sun Feb 9 12:47:23 2025 read: IOPS=1147, BW=1148MiB/s (1204MB/s)(135GiB/120232msec) slat (usec): min=85, max=5262, avg=227.18, stdev=77.99 clat (msec): min=4, max=8281, avg=222.71, stdev=594.91 lat (msec): min=5, max=8282, avg=222.94, stdev=594.91 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 11], 5.00th=[ 18], 10.00th=[ 22], 20.00th=[ 32], | 30.00th=[ 44], 40.00th=[ 58], 50.00th=[ 83], 60.00th=[ 123], | 70.00th=[ 184], 80.00th=[ 271], 90.00th=[ 430], 95.00th=[ 625], | 99.00th=[ 2937], 99.50th=[ 5873], 99.90th=[ 7013], 99.95th=[ 7215], | 99.99th=[ 8020] bw ( MiB/s): min= 690, max= 1702, per=100.00%, avg=1148.01, stdev=49.84, samples=960 iops : min= 690, max= 1702, avg=1148.01, stdev=49.84, samples=960 lat (msec) : 10=0.76%, 20=7.06%, 50=27.30%, 100=20.13%, 250=22.73% lat (msec) : 500=14.43%, 750=3.94%, 1000=1.34%, 2000=1.01%, >=2000=1.30% cpu : usr=0.20%, sys=6.89%, ctx=130615, majf=0, minf=98476 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=138013,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1148MiB/s (1204MB/s), 1148MiB/s-1148MiB/s (1204MB/s-1204MB/s), io=135GiB (145GB), run=120232-120232msec ``` With a new file, to see if it gets put on a different disk ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1176MiB/s][r=1176 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=234249: Sun Feb 9 12:51:00 2025 read: IOPS=1162, BW=1163MiB/s (1219MB/s)(137GiB/120312msec) slat (usec): min=86, max=21862, avg=228.24, stdev=104.83 clat (msec): min=5, max=10454, avg=219.87, stdev=849.33 lat (msec): min=5, max=10454, avg=220.10, stdev=849.32 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 12], 5.00th=[ 16], 10.00th=[ 20], 20.00th=[ 28], | 30.00th=[ 37], 40.00th=[ 51], 50.00th=[ 71], 60.00th=[ 105], | 70.00th=[ 150], 80.00th=[ 218], 90.00th=[ 342], 95.00th=[ 493], | 99.00th=[ 3842], 99.50th=[ 8423], 99.90th=[ 9866], 99.95th=[10000], | 99.99th=[10402] bw ( MiB/s): min= 376, max= 1708, per=100.00%, avg=1163.74, stdev=54.61, samples=960 iops : min= 376, max= 1708, avg=1163.49, stdev=54.60, samples=960 lat (msec) : 10=0.63%, 20=10.23%, 50=29.09%, 100=18.99%, 250=24.73% lat (msec) : 500=11.50%, 750=2.38%, 1000=0.72%, 2000=0.60%, >=2000=1.13% cpu : usr=0.21%, sys=7.00%, ctx=131824, majf=0, minf=92819 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=139874,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1163MiB/s (1219MB/s), 1163MiB/s-1163MiB/s (1219MB/s-1219MB/s), io=137GiB (147GB), run=120312-120312msec ``` ### Case 3 - two nodes at the same time, case 1 and 2 on different files The results below show that the network connection at the node is the limiting factor for bandwidth ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 1 (f=1): [_(3),R(1)][100.0%][r=182MiB/s][r=728 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=132630: Sun Feb 9 12:53:45 2025 read: IOPS=4664, BW=1166MiB/s (1223MB/s)(138GiB/121012msec) slat (usec): min=43, max=6016, avg=162.53, stdev=41.76 clat (usec): min=1702, max=1575.0k, avg=54456.90, stdev=59482.66 lat (usec): min=1858, max=1575.1k, avg=54619.78, stdev=59481.72 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 8], 10.00th=[ 11], 20.00th=[ 16], | 30.00th=[ 23], 40.00th=[ 31], 50.00th=[ 40], 60.00th=[ 50], | 70.00th=[ 63], 80.00th=[ 82], 90.00th=[ 113], 95.00th=[ 148], | 99.00th=[ 259], 99.50th=[ 326], 99.90th=[ 701], 99.95th=[ 1020], | 99.99th=[ 1217] bw ( MiB/s): min= 810, max= 1468, per=100.00%, avg=1175.75, stdev=27.90, samples=959 iops : min= 3242, max= 5874, avg=4702.99, stdev=111.62, samples=959 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.19%, 10=8.97%, 20=17.08%, 50=34.36% lat (msec) : 100=26.19%, 250=12.10%, 500=0.95%, 750=0.07%, 1000=0.03% lat (msec) : 2000=0.05% cpu : usr=0.85%, sys=20.14%, ctx=466442, majf=0, minf=54023 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=564452,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1166MiB/s (1223MB/s), 1166MiB/s-1166MiB/s (1223MB/s-1223MB/s), io=138GiB (148GB), run=121012-121012msec ``` ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1182MiB/s][r=1182 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=234303: Sun Feb 9 12:53:46 2025 read: IOPS=1177, BW=1177MiB/s (1234MB/s)(138GiB/120282msec) slat (usec): min=88, max=5111, avg=226.57, stdev=71.50 clat (msec): min=6, max=9929, avg=217.17, stdev=805.87 lat (msec): min=6, max=9929, avg=217.40, stdev=805.87 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 14], 5.00th=[ 17], 10.00th=[ 21], 20.00th=[ 29], | 30.00th=[ 38], 40.00th=[ 51], 50.00th=[ 71], 60.00th=[ 104], | 70.00th=[ 153], 80.00th=[ 220], 90.00th=[ 347], 95.00th=[ 498], | 99.00th=[ 5537], 99.50th=[ 8087], 99.90th=[ 9060], 99.95th=[ 9194], | 99.99th=[ 9463] bw ( MiB/s): min= 702, max= 1790, per=100.00%, avg=1177.77, stdev=51.14, samples=960 iops : min= 702, max= 1790, avg=1177.77, stdev=51.14, samples=960 lat (msec) : 10=0.12%, 20=9.43%, 50=30.04%, 100=19.59%, 250=24.10% lat (msec) : 500=11.75%, 750=2.59%, 1000=0.78%, 2000=0.47%, >=2000=1.13% cpu : usr=0.22%, sys=7.02%, ctx=133487, majf=0, minf=82036 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=141584,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1177MiB/s (1234MB/s), 1177MiB/s-1177MiB/s (1234MB/s-1234MB/s), io=138GiB (148GB), run=120282-120282msec ``` ### Case 4 - two nodes case 2 on same file ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1175MiB/s][r=1175 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=234371: Sun Feb 9 12:56:33 2025 read: IOPS=1177, BW=1178MiB/s (1235MB/s)(138GiB/120238msec) slat (usec): min=68, max=4341, avg=227.49, stdev=111.04 clat (msec): min=6, max=9032, avg=217.09, stdev=744.27 lat (msec): min=6, max=9032, avg=217.32, stdev=744.27 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 13], 5.00th=[ 17], 10.00th=[ 20], 20.00th=[ 27], | 30.00th=[ 36], 40.00th=[ 49], 50.00th=[ 68], 60.00th=[ 101], | 70.00th=[ 148], 80.00th=[ 218], 90.00th=[ 342], 95.00th=[ 514], | 99.00th=[ 5604], 99.50th=[ 7013], 99.90th=[ 8288], 99.95th=[ 8423], | 99.99th=[ 8792] bw ( MiB/s): min= 636, max= 1924, per=100.00%, avg=1177.84, stdev=51.23, samples=960 iops : min= 636, max= 1924, avg=1177.84, stdev=51.23, samples=960 lat (msec) : 10=0.12%, 20=10.82%, 50=30.09%, 100=18.94%, 250=23.61% lat (msec) : 500=11.18%, 750=2.42%, 1000=0.68%, 2000=0.60%, >=2000=1.55% cpu : usr=0.22%, sys=7.05%, ctx=133445, majf=0, minf=196978 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=141593,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1178MiB/s (1235MB/s), 1178MiB/s-1178MiB/s (1235MB/s-1235MB/s), io=138GiB (148GB), run=120238-120238msec ``` ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=1183MiB/s][r=1183 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=132689: Sun Feb 9 12:56:32 2025 read: IOPS=1117, BW=1118MiB/s (1172MB/s)(131GiB/120339msec) slat (usec): min=54, max=195553, avg=421.97, stdev=4088.77 clat (msec): min=7, max=11231, avg=228.48, stdev=732.36 lat (msec): min=7, max=11232, avg=228.90, stdev=732.80 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 14], 5.00th=[ 20], 10.00th=[ 26], 20.00th=[ 38], | 30.00th=[ 52], 40.00th=[ 71], 50.00th=[ 95], 60.00th=[ 129], | 70.00th=[ 174], 80.00th=[ 239], 90.00th=[ 368], 95.00th=[ 523], | 99.00th=[ 3641], 99.50th=[ 7215], 99.90th=[ 8356], 99.95th=[ 9060], | 99.99th=[10805] bw ( MiB/s): min= 52, max= 1770, per=100.00%, avg=1119.05, stdev=72.44, samples=960 iops : min= 52, max= 1770, avg=1119.05, stdev=72.44, samples=960 lat (msec) : 10=0.07%, 20=5.59%, 50=23.27%, 100=22.69%, 250=29.85% lat (msec) : 500=13.05%, 750=2.73%, 1000=0.81%, 2000=0.61%, >=2000=1.33% cpu : usr=0.30%, sys=6.92%, ctx=125102, majf=0, minf=232459 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=134538,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1118MiB/s (1172MB/s), 1118MiB/s-1118MiB/s (1172MB/s-1172MB/s), io=131GiB (141GB), run=120339-120339msec ``` ### Case 5 - seq read 28 processes Jobfile ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=28 name=raw-read rw=read size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 28 processes Jobs: 28 (f=28): [R(28)][100.0%][r=1179MiB/s][r=4716 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=28): err= 0: pid=234528: Sun Feb 9 13:00:30 2025 read: IOPS=4706, BW=1177MiB/s (1234MB/s)(138GiB/120485msec) slat (usec): min=54, max=5704, avg=181.58, stdev=51.82 clat (msec): min=2, max=13460, avg=380.00, stdev=1282.10 lat (msec): min=2, max=13460, avg=380.19, stdev=1282.10 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 5], 5.00th=[ 7], 10.00th=[ 9], 20.00th=[ 14], | 30.00th=[ 21], 40.00th=[ 31], 50.00th=[ 48], 60.00th=[ 80], | 70.00th=[ 136], 80.00th=[ 243], 90.00th=[ 558], 95.00th=[ 1720], | 99.00th=[ 7752], 99.50th=[10000], 99.90th=[12550], 99.95th=[12818], | 99.99th=[13221] bw ( MiB/s): min= 20, max= 4566, per=100.00%, avg=1362.19, stdev=33.55, samples=5809 iops : min= 80, max=18265, avg=5448.75, stdev=134.19, samples=5809 lat (msec) : 4=0.25%, 10=13.40%, 20=16.10%, 50=21.03%, 100=13.63% lat (msec) : 250=16.04%, 500=8.66%, 750=2.80%, 1000=1.35%, 2000=2.08% lat (msec) : >=2000=4.65% cpu : usr=0.13%, sys=3.26%, ctx=544521, majf=0, minf=230030 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.2%, >=64=99.7% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=567111,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1177MiB/s (1234MB/s), 1177MiB/s-1177MiB/s (1234MB/s-1234MB/s), io=138GiB (149GB), run=120485-120485msec ``` ### Case 6 - seq read 1 process This case shows that we can't saturate the bandwidth with 1 fio process Input ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=1 name=raw-read rw=read size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=760MiB/s][r=3039 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=234628: Sun Feb 9 13:03:17 2025 read: IOPS=3386, BW=847MiB/s (888MB/s)(99.4GiB/120211msec) slat (usec): min=51, max=4843, avg=165.12, stdev=124.09 clat (usec): min=1823, max=1115.6k, avg=18728.88, stdev=36821.54 lat (usec): min=1993, max=1115.7k, avg=18894.20, stdev=36813.90 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 5], 10.00th=[ 6], 20.00th=[ 7], | 30.00th=[ 8], 40.00th=[ 9], 50.00th=[ 10], 60.00th=[ 11], | 70.00th=[ 13], 80.00th=[ 18], 90.00th=[ 36], 95.00th=[ 68], | 99.00th=[ 163], 99.50th=[ 222], 99.90th=[ 477], 99.95th=[ 617], | 99.99th=[ 827] bw ( KiB/s): min=562688, max=1082880, per=100.00%, avg=868390.40, stdev=99229.00, samples=240 iops : min= 2198, max= 4230, avg=3392.15, stdev=387.61, samples=240 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=1.98%, 10=52.14%, 20=28.96%, 50=9.76% lat (msec) : 100=4.44%, 250=2.31%, 500=0.31%, 750=0.07%, 1000=0.02% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01% cpu : usr=1.65%, sys=55.86%, ctx=233397, majf=0, minf=17998 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=407121,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=847MiB/s (888MB/s), 847MiB/s-847MiB/s (888MB/s-888MB/s), io=99.4GiB (107GB), run=120211-120211msec ``` With 2 output - around 13:05 ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 2 processes Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1),_(1)][100.0%][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=2): err= 0: pid=132833: Sun Feb 9 13:05:21 2025 read: IOPS=2780, BW=695MiB/s (729MB/s)(85.6GiB/126138msec) slat (usec): min=38, max=7102, avg=160.43, stdev=93.72 clat (usec): min=655, max=15486k, avg=45376.51, stdev=546472.40 lat (usec): min=1604, max=15486k, avg=45537.18, stdev=546470.37 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 4], 10.00th=[ 5], 20.00th=[ 6], | 30.00th=[ 6], 40.00th=[ 7], 50.00th=[ 9], 60.00th=[ 11], | 70.00th=[ 15], 80.00th=[ 23], 90.00th=[ 43], 95.00th=[ 74], | 99.00th=[ 184], 99.50th=[ 292], 99.90th=[12953], 99.95th=[13758], | 99.99th=[14563] bw ( KiB/s): min=26624, max=1438208, per=100.00%, avg=765534.15, stdev=176710.53, samples=469 iops : min= 104, max= 5618, avg=2990.36, stdev=690.27, samples=469 lat (usec) : 750=0.01% lat (msec) : 2=0.18%, 4=9.27%, 10=48.65%, 20=19.58%, 50=13.97% lat (msec) : 100=5.34%, 250=2.40%, 500=0.19%, 750=0.02%, 1000=0.05% lat (msec) : 2000=0.10%, >=2000=0.25% cpu : usr=0.64%, sys=23.28%, ctx=262203, majf=0, minf=24740 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=350722,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=695MiB/s (729MB/s), 695MiB/s-695MiB/s (729MB/s-729MB/s), io=85.6GiB (91.9GB), run=126138-126138msec ``` Much slower than expected - why? With 3 output - around 13:05 ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 3 processes Jobs: 1 (f=1): [_(2),R(1)][100.0%][r=15.8MiB/s][r=63 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=3): err= 0: pid=234673: Sun Feb 9 13:05:46 2025 read: IOPS=3375, BW=844MiB/s (885MB/s)(102GiB/124242msec) slat (usec): min=46, max=14479, avg=223.24, stdev=139.23 clat (usec): min=1650, max=15990k, avg=56248.34, stdev=614371.38 lat (usec): min=1810, max=15990k, avg=56471.82, stdev=614367.78 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 5], 10.00th=[ 5], 20.00th=[ 7], | 30.00th=[ 8], 40.00th=[ 9], 50.00th=[ 11], 60.00th=[ 13], | 70.00th=[ 18], 80.00th=[ 27], 90.00th=[ 52], 95.00th=[ 83], | 99.00th=[ 188], 99.50th=[ 305], 99.90th=[13087], 99.95th=[13758], | 99.99th=[14966] bw ( KiB/s): min=86528, max=1634304, per=100.00%, avg=901704.97, stdev=104746.15, samples=714 iops : min= 338, max= 6384, avg=3522.29, stdev=409.16, samples=714 lat (msec) : 2=0.06%, 4=4.43%, 10=45.39%, 20=23.98%, 50=15.91% lat (msec) : 100=6.75%, 250=2.85%, 500=0.21%, 750=0.02%, 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.39% cpu : usr=0.76%, sys=25.90%, ctx=313501, majf=0, minf=31555 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=419344,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=844MiB/s (885MB/s), 844MiB/s-844MiB/s (885MB/s-885MB/s), io=102GiB (110GB), run=124242-124242msec ``` Much slower than expected - why? Repeat of 2 ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 2 processes Jobs: 2 (f=2): [R(2)][100.0%][r=1172MiB/s][r=4688 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=2): err= 0: pid=132885: Sun Feb 9 13:08:13 2025 read: IOPS=4611, BW=1153MiB/s (1209MB/s)(136GiB/120427msec) slat (usec): min=44, max=8028, avg=143.60, stdev=47.43 clat (usec): min=1587, max=2149.6k, avg=27564.93, stdev=54307.82 lat (usec): min=1756, max=2149.7k, avg=27708.79, stdev=54306.66 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 5], 5.00th=[ 6], 10.00th=[ 7], 20.00th=[ 9], | 30.00th=[ 11], 40.00th=[ 13], 50.00th=[ 16], 60.00th=[ 20], | 70.00th=[ 26], 80.00th=[ 36], 90.00th=[ 56], 95.00th=[ 82], | 99.00th=[ 163], 99.50th=[ 226], 99.90th=[ 827], 99.95th=[ 1301], | 99.99th=[ 1703] bw ( MiB/s): min= 538, max= 1485, per=100.00%, avg=1157.16, stdev=62.41, samples=479 iops : min= 2152, max= 5940, avg=4628.67, stdev=249.65, samples=479 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.94%, 10=27.63%, 20=31.60%, 50=28.04% lat (msec) : 100=8.42%, 250=2.96%, 500=0.25%, 750=0.04%, 1000=0.04% lat (msec) : 2000=0.07%, >=2000=0.01% cpu : usr=1.09%, sys=34.48%, ctx=400565, majf=0, minf=52028 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=555316,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1153MiB/s (1209MB/s), 1153MiB/s-1153MiB/s (1209MB/s-1209MB/s), io=136GiB (146GB), run=120427-120427msec ``` Repeat of 3 ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 3 processes Jobs: 3 (f=3): [R(3)][100.0%][r=1178MiB/s][r=4710 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=3): err= 0: pid=234725: Sun Feb 9 13:08:05 2025 read: IOPS=4675, BW=1169MiB/s (1226MB/s)(137GiB/120073msec) slat (usec): min=50, max=14698, avg=181.83, stdev=67.89 clat (usec): min=1839, max=2187.6k, avg=40870.42, stdev=63044.02 lat (msec): min=2, max=2187, avg=41.05, stdev=63.04 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 7], 10.00th=[ 9], 20.00th=[ 12], | 30.00th=[ 16], 40.00th=[ 21], 50.00th=[ 27], 60.00th=[ 34], | 70.00th=[ 44], 80.00th=[ 59], 90.00th=[ 86], 95.00th=[ 115], | 99.00th=[ 203], 99.50th=[ 262], 99.90th=[ 902], 99.95th=[ 1435], | 99.99th=[ 2022] bw ( MiB/s): min= 694, max= 1596, per=100.00%, avg=1169.26, stdev=44.76, samples=720 iops : min= 2776, max= 6386, avg=4677.03, stdev=179.04, samples=720 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.17%, 10=14.21%, 20=25.23%, 50=35.24% lat (msec) : 100=18.10%, 250=6.49%, 500=0.38%, 750=0.06%, 1000=0.03% lat (msec) : 2000=0.08%, >=2000=0.01% cpu : usr=1.02%, sys=29.60%, ctx=433163, majf=0, minf=35168 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=561432,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1169MiB/s (1226MB/s), 1169MiB/s-1169MiB/s (1226MB/s-1226MB/s), io=137GiB (147GB), run=120073-120073msec ``` Repeat of 1 - again doesn't saturate, seems to be genuine ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=813MiB/s][r=3252 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=234793: Sun Feb 9 13:10:38 2025 read: IOPS=3327, BW=832MiB/s (872MB/s)(97.6GiB/120131msec) slat (usec): min=51, max=4484, avg=167.07, stdev=126.14 clat (usec): min=1378, max=1915.4k, avg=19060.43, stdev=51280.28 lat (usec): min=1831, max=1915.5k, avg=19227.67, stdev=51273.92 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 5], 10.00th=[ 6], 20.00th=[ 7], | 30.00th=[ 8], 40.00th=[ 9], 50.00th=[ 10], 60.00th=[ 11], | 70.00th=[ 13], 80.00th=[ 17], 90.00th=[ 34], 95.00th=[ 65], | 99.00th=[ 163], 99.50th=[ 224], 99.90th=[ 818], 99.95th=[ 1053], | 99.99th=[ 1519] bw ( KiB/s): min=466944, max=1054208, per=100.00%, avg=852744.53, stdev=110314.08, samples=240 iops : min= 1824, max= 4118, avg=3331.03, stdev=430.91, samples=240 lat (msec) : 2=0.02%, 4=2.54%, 10=52.92%, 20=28.42%, 50=9.31% lat (msec) : 100=4.28%, 250=2.10%, 500=0.20%, 750=0.08%, 1000=0.06% lat (msec) : 2000=0.06% cpu : usr=1.67%, sys=55.49%, ctx=226708, majf=0, minf=4111 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=399787,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=832MiB/s (872MB/s), 832MiB/s-832MiB/s (872MB/s-872MB/s), io=97.6GiB (105GB), run=120131-120131msec ``` ### Case 7 - random read latency Jobfile ``` [global] bs=4K iodepth=1 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=1 name=readlatency-test-job rw=randread [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=284KiB/s][r=71 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=234847: Sun Feb 9 13:14:02 2025 read: IOPS=76, BW=306KiB/s (314kB/s)(35.9MiB/120002msec) slat (usec): min=127, max=500, avg=169.64, stdev=17.16 clat (usec): min=731, max=613984, avg=12885.33, stdev=39086.79 lat (usec): min=881, max=614146, avg=13055.19, stdev=39087.48 clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 1020], 5.00th=[ 1123], 10.00th=[ 1188], 20.00th=[ 1287], | 30.00th=[ 1369], 40.00th=[ 1532], 50.00th=[ 1729], 60.00th=[ 1975], | 70.00th=[ 2311], 80.00th=[ 2933], 90.00th=[ 29492], 95.00th=[ 84411], | 99.00th=[196084], 99.50th=[248513], 99.90th=[408945], 99.95th=[476054], | 99.99th=[616563] bw ( KiB/s): min= 8, max= 880, per=100.00%, avg=307.04, stdev=148.48, samples=239 iops : min= 2, max= 220, avg=76.76, stdev=37.12, samples=239 lat (usec) : 750=0.02%, 1000=0.77% lat (msec) : 2=60.25%, 4=21.36%, 10=2.94%, 20=2.84%, 50=4.23% lat (msec) : 100=3.71%, 250=3.38%, 500=0.47%, 750=0.02% cpu : usr=0.07%, sys=1.36%, ctx=9221, majf=0, minf=13 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=9190,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=306KiB/s (314kB/s), 306KiB/s-306KiB/s (314kB/s-314kB/s), io=35.9MiB (37.6MB), run=120002-120002msec ``` ### Case 8 - random read bandwidth Jobfile ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=4 name=raw-randread rw=randread [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test1 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 2 (f=2): [r(1),_(1),r(1),_(1)][100.0%][r=167MiB/s][r=668 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=133014: Sun Feb 9 13:18:52 2025 read: IOPS=4657, BW=1164MiB/s (1221MB/s)(138GiB/120960msec) slat (usec): min=59, max=8884, avg=174.61, stdev=33.64 clat (msec): min=2, max=1956, avg=54.69, stdev=106.58 lat (msec): min=2, max=1956, avg=54.87, stdev=106.58 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 7], 10.00th=[ 8], 20.00th=[ 10], | 30.00th=[ 11], 40.00th=[ 14], 50.00th=[ 17], 60.00th=[ 24], | 70.00th=[ 37], 80.00th=[ 65], 90.00th=[ 142], 95.00th=[ 239], | 99.00th=[ 531], 99.50th=[ 684], 99.90th=[ 1099], 99.95th=[ 1318], | 99.99th=[ 1620] bw ( MiB/s): min= 738, max= 1467, per=100.00%, avg=1173.21, stdev=26.20, samples=960 iops : min= 2954, max= 5868, avg=4692.84, stdev=104.79, samples=960 lat (msec) : 4=0.16%, 10=25.23%, 20=29.85%, 50=20.68%, 100=10.26% lat (msec) : 250=9.30%, 500=3.37%, 750=0.76%, 1000=0.24%, 2000=0.15% cpu : usr=1.02%, sys=21.61%, ctx=438328, majf=0, minf=35451 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=563393,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1164MiB/s (1221MB/s), 1164MiB/s-1164MiB/s (1221MB/s-1221MB/s), io=138GiB (148GB), run=120960-120960msec ``` Output with 1 process ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=1094MiB/s][r=4375 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=234922: Sun Feb 9 13:20:28 2025 read: IOPS=4210, BW=1053MiB/s (1104MB/s)(124GiB/120179msec) slat (usec): min=51, max=6953, avg=141.15, stdev=42.01 clat (usec): min=1724, max=1883.1k, avg=15056.63, stdev=41548.21 lat (usec): min=1864, max=1883.2k, avg=15197.93, stdev=41548.38 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 3], 10.00th=[ 4], 20.00th=[ 4], | 30.00th=[ 5], 40.00th=[ 5], 50.00th=[ 6], 60.00th=[ 6], | 70.00th=[ 7], 80.00th=[ 10], 90.00th=[ 31], 95.00th=[ 69], | 99.00th=[ 180], 99.50th=[ 230], 99.90th=[ 456], 99.95th=[ 651], | 99.99th=[ 1284] bw ( MiB/s): min= 764, max= 1157, per=100.00%, avg=1053.96, stdev=63.51, samples=240 iops : min= 3056, max= 4628, avg=4215.84, stdev=254.02, samples=240 lat (msec) : 2=0.03%, 4=27.40%, 10=53.84%, 20=6.18%, 50=5.57% lat (msec) : 100=4.01%, 250=2.57%, 500=0.32%, 750=0.04%, 1000=0.02% lat (msec) : 2000=0.02% cpu : usr=2.08%, sys=59.57%, ctx=243449, majf=0, minf=19379 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=505964,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1053MiB/s (1104MB/s), 1053MiB/s-1053MiB/s (1104MB/s-1104MB/s), io=124GiB (133GB), run=120179-120179msec ``` ### Case 9 - random rw Input ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=4 name=raw-randreadwrite rw=randrw size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test3 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [m(4)][100.0%][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=235033: Sun Feb 9 13:26:10 2025 read: IOPS=1158, BW=290MiB/s (304MB/s)(36.7GiB/129904msec) slat (usec): min=50, max=1969, avg=198.47, stdev=48.49 clat (usec): min=1717, max=15051k, avg=92206.70, stdev=458379.24 lat (usec): min=1899, max=15052k, avg=92405.50, stdev=458380.92 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 3], 10.00th=[ 3], 20.00th=[ 4], | 30.00th=[ 5], 40.00th=[ 6], 50.00th=[ 10], 60.00th=[ 20], | 70.00th=[ 36], 80.00th=[ 71], 90.00th=[ 174], 95.00th=[ 334], | 99.00th=[ 1116], 99.50th=[ 2400], 99.90th=[ 6812], 99.95th=[ 9597], | 99.99th=[12818] bw ( KiB/s): min=159744, max=479744, per=100.00%, avg=320801.74, stdev=14656.32, samples=960 iops : min= 624, max= 1874, avg=1253.11, stdev=57.25, samples=960 write: IOPS=1159, BW=290MiB/s (304MB/s)(36.8GiB/129904msec); 0 zone resets slat (usec): min=58, max=4829, avg=239.87, stdev=109.04 clat (msec): min=5, max=15012, avg=127.26, stdev=499.30 lat (msec): min=5, max=15013, avg=127.50, stdev=499.30 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 10], 5.00th=[ 15], 10.00th=[ 18], 20.00th=[ 22], | 30.00th=[ 27], 40.00th=[ 32], 50.00th=[ 39], 60.00th=[ 51], | 70.00th=[ 72], 80.00th=[ 114], 90.00th=[ 226], 95.00th=[ 401], | 99.00th=[ 1217], 99.50th=[ 2802], 99.90th=[ 9194], 99.95th=[ 9731], | 99.99th=[12818] bw ( KiB/s): min=169472, max=490496, per=100.00%, avg=321100.32, stdev=14166.73, samples=960 iops : min= 662, max= 1916, avg=1254.28, stdev=55.34, samples=960 lat (msec) : 2=0.07%, 4=14.69%, 10=10.89%, 20=12.91%, 50=28.83% lat (msec) : 100=13.59%, 250=11.08%, 500=4.56%, 750=1.47%, 1000=0.66% lat (msec) : 2000=0.66%, >=2000=0.57% cpu : usr=1.23%, sys=12.33%, ctx=257127, majf=0, minf=16669 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.9% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=150473,150667,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=290MiB/s (304MB/s), 290MiB/s-290MiB/s (304MB/s-304MB/s), io=36.7GiB (39.4GB), run=129904-129904msec WRITE: bw=290MiB/s (304MB/s), 290MiB/s-290MiB/s (304MB/s-304MB/s), io=36.8GiB (39.5GB), run=129904-129904msec ``` Does this show that performance of other benchmarks shows caching? Test with a much larger file that won't be cached ### Case 10 - 100GB file seq read Jobfile ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=60 numjobs=4 name=raw-read rw=read size=100G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test_100G ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=585MiB/s][r=2341 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=235789: Sun Feb 9 13:33:08 2025 read: IOPS=2580, BW=645MiB/s (677MB/s)(38.0GiB/60326msec) slat (usec): min=54, max=8994, avg=227.18, stdev=188.56 clat (usec): min=1661, max=1025.0k, avg=98924.95, stdev=136291.56 lat (usec): min=1833, max=1025.2k, avg=99152.32, stdev=136261.29 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 5], 10.00th=[ 7], 20.00th=[ 12], | 30.00th=[ 19], 40.00th=[ 28], 50.00th=[ 42], 60.00th=[ 59], | 70.00th=[ 85], 80.00th=[ 171], 90.00th=[ 296], 95.00th=[ 401], | 99.00th=[ 600], 99.50th=[ 693], 99.90th=[ 877], 99.95th=[ 919], | 99.99th=[ 1011] bw ( KiB/s): min=250880, max=1191936, per=100.00%, avg=663210.67, stdev=41274.75, samples=480 iops : min= 980, max= 4656, avg=2590.68, stdev=161.23, samples=480 lat (msec) : 2=0.07%, 4=2.65%, 10=15.38%, 20=13.39%, 50=23.75% lat (msec) : 100=17.65%, 250=14.05%, 500=10.69%, 750=2.09%, 1000=0.27% lat (msec) : 2000=0.02% cpu : usr=0.44%, sys=14.92%, ctx=124150, majf=0, minf=27026 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=155695,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=645MiB/s (677MB/s), 645MiB/s-645MiB/s (677MB/s-677MB/s), io=38.0GiB (40.8GB), run=60326-60326msec ``` Repeat after deleting file ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][9.3%][r=771MiB/s][r=3085 IOPS][eta 09m:56s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=235900: Sun Feb 9 13:36:44 2025 read: IOPS=2531, BW=633MiB/s (664MB/s)(37.2GiB/60201msec) slat (usec): min=53, max=7276, avg=224.25, stdev=174.54 clat (usec): min=1647, max=1528.2k, avg=100870.34, stdev=136508.59 lat (usec): min=1831, max=1528.3k, avg=101094.83, stdev=136480.13 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 6], 10.00th=[ 7], 20.00th=[ 12], | 30.00th=[ 21], 40.00th=[ 32], 50.00th=[ 48], 60.00th=[ 69], | 70.00th=[ 101], 80.00th=[ 167], 90.00th=[ 275], 95.00th=[ 393], | 99.00th=[ 609], 99.50th=[ 718], 99.90th=[ 978], 99.95th=[ 1385], | 99.99th=[ 1519] bw ( KiB/s): min=296960, max=1181184, per=100.00%, avg=649102.70, stdev=43387.20, samples=480 iops : min= 1160, max= 4614, avg=2535.53, stdev=169.47, samples=480 lat (msec) : 2=0.03%, 4=2.19%, 10=14.94%, 20=12.22%, 50=21.83% lat (msec) : 100=18.77%, 250=18.27%, 500=9.51%, 750=1.78%, 1000=0.38% lat (msec) : 2000=0.09% cpu : usr=0.46%, sys=14.52%, ctx=123222, majf=0, minf=29709 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=152389,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=633MiB/s (664MB/s), 633MiB/s-633MiB/s (664MB/s-664MB/s), io=37.2GiB (39.9GB), run=60201-60201msec ``` Repeat keeping file ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=658MiB/s][r=2632 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=235934: Sun Feb 9 13:37:53 2025 read: IOPS=3818, BW=955MiB/s (1001MB/s)(56.2GiB/60253msec) slat (usec): min=52, max=14983, avg=199.21, stdev=113.11 clat (usec): min=1652, max=1425.2k, avg=66776.98, stdev=95989.52 lat (usec): min=1815, max=1425.4k, avg=66976.43, stdev=95978.41 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 7], 10.00th=[ 8], 20.00th=[ 12], | 30.00th=[ 17], 40.00th=[ 24], 50.00th=[ 33], 60.00th=[ 45], | 70.00th=[ 64], 80.00th=[ 95], 90.00th=[ 161], 95.00th=[ 255], | 99.00th=[ 477], 99.50th=[ 567], 99.90th=[ 810], 99.95th=[ 919], | 99.99th=[ 995] bw ( KiB/s): min=313344, max=1880064, per=100.00%, avg=980548.27, stdev=78527.08, samples=480 iops : min= 1224, max= 7344, avg=3830.27, stdev=306.75, samples=480 lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=1.11%, 10=14.62%, 20=19.72%, 50=28.10% lat (msec) : 100=17.62%, 250=13.63%, 500=4.39%, 750=0.64%, 1000=0.15% lat (msec) : 2000=0.01% cpu : usr=0.69%, sys=19.77%, ctx=186279, majf=0, minf=51174 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.9% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=230068,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=955MiB/s (1001MB/s), 955MiB/s-955MiB/s (1001MB/s-1001MB/s), io=56.2GiB (60.3GB), run=60253-60253msec ``` Repeat after deleting file ``` job1: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [R(4)][100.0%][r=707MiB/s][r=2829 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=236216: Sun Feb 9 13:47:03 2025 read: IOPS=2707, BW=677MiB/s (710MB/s)(39.9GiB/60389msec) slat (usec): min=48, max=7927, avg=225.54, stdev=174.79 clat (usec): min=1648, max=1234.9k, avg=94278.95, stdev=133825.06 lat (usec): min=1807, max=1235.1k, avg=94504.71, stdev=133797.42 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 4], 5.00th=[ 6], 10.00th=[ 7], 20.00th=[ 12], | 30.00th=[ 20], 40.00th=[ 29], 50.00th=[ 42], 60.00th=[ 57], | 70.00th=[ 81], 80.00th=[ 150], 90.00th=[ 275], 95.00th=[ 372], | 99.00th=[ 634], 99.50th=[ 743], 99.90th=[ 969], 99.95th=[ 1028], | 99.99th=[ 1200] bw ( KiB/s): min=276791, max=1096192, per=100.00%, avg=696569.50, stdev=41634.45, samples=480 iops : min= 1081, max= 4282, avg=2720.97, stdev=162.64, samples=480 lat (msec) : 2=0.05%, 4=2.30%, 10=15.25%, 20=13.27%, 50=25.11% lat (msec) : 100=18.11%, 250=14.54%, 500=9.09%, 750=1.82%, 1000=0.39% lat (msec) : 2000=0.06% cpu : usr=0.44%, sys=15.65%, ctx=131238, majf=0, minf=24737 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=163513,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=677MiB/s (710MB/s), 677MiB/s-677MiB/s (710MB/s-710MB/s), io=39.9GiB (42.9GB), run=60389-60389msec ``` ### Case 11 - 100GB random read Jobfile ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=60 numjobs=4 name=raw-read rw=randread size=100G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test_100G ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [r(4)][16.6%][r=1159MiB/s][r=4637 IOPS][eta 05m:06s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=236025: Sun Feb 9 13:42:50 2025 read: IOPS=4531, BW=1133MiB/s (1188MB/s)(66.8GiB/60391msec) slat (usec): min=53, max=1090, avg=189.44, stdev=27.98 clat (msec): min=2, max=2202, avg=56.20, stdev=83.07 lat (msec): min=2, max=2203, avg=56.39, stdev=83.07 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 6], 5.00th=[ 7], 10.00th=[ 9], 20.00th=[ 15], | 30.00th=[ 20], 40.00th=[ 24], 50.00th=[ 29], 60.00th=[ 36], | 70.00th=[ 50], 80.00th=[ 73], 90.00th=[ 130], 95.00th=[ 220], | 99.00th=[ 397], 99.50th=[ 514], 99.90th=[ 793], 99.95th=[ 969], | 99.99th=[ 1536] bw ( MiB/s): min= 840, max= 1305, per=100.00%, avg=1139.16, stdev=25.40, samples=480 iops : min= 3360, max= 5222, avg=4556.63, stdev=101.60, samples=480 lat (msec) : 4=0.14%, 10=12.32%, 20=19.50%, 50=38.26%, 100=16.12% lat (msec) : 250=10.28%, 500=2.84%, 750=0.42%, 1000=0.07%, 2000=0.05% lat (msec) : >=2000=0.01% cpu : usr=0.92%, sys=22.46%, ctx=218438, majf=0, minf=16697 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.9% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=273650,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1133MiB/s (1188MB/s), 1133MiB/s-1133MiB/s (1188MB/s-1188MB/s), io=66.8GiB (71.7GB), run=60391-60391msec ``` This is faster than I expected - were the previous tests slowed down? ### Case 12 - random rw latency Input ``` ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1 (f=1): [m(1)][100.0%][r=24KiB/s,w=24KiB/s][r=6,w=6 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=236267: Sun Feb 9 13:51:17 2025 read: IOPS=14, BW=58.7KiB/s (60.1kB/s)(7048KiB/120075msec) slat (usec): min=130, max=756, avg=173.90, stdev=26.19 clat (usec): min=891, max=417542, avg=17532.07, stdev=42407.83 lat (usec): min=1055, max=417716, avg=17706.18, stdev=42409.15 clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 1045], 5.00th=[ 1156], 10.00th=[ 1221], 20.00th=[ 1319], | 30.00th=[ 1467], 40.00th=[ 1729], 50.00th=[ 2089], 60.00th=[ 2638], | 70.00th=[ 8717], 80.00th=[ 17695], 90.00th=[ 47449], 95.00th=[ 89654], | 99.00th=[233833], 99.50th=[287310], 99.90th=[367002], 99.95th=[417334], | 99.99th=[417334] bw ( KiB/s): min= 8, max= 200, per=100.00%, avg=61.29, stdev=38.82, samples=230 iops : min= 2, max= 50, avg=15.32, stdev= 9.71, samples=230 write: IOPS=15, BW=61.3KiB/s (62.7kB/s)(7356KiB/120075msec); 0 zone resets slat (usec): min=152, max=109592, avg=236.55, stdev=2551.55 clat (msec): min=2, max=722, avg=48.09, stdev=86.36 lat (msec): min=2, max=722, avg=48.32, stdev=86.37 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 4], 10.00th=[ 4], 20.00th=[ 5], | 30.00th=[ 6], 40.00th=[ 6], 50.00th=[ 8], 60.00th=[ 17], | 70.00th=[ 29], 80.00th=[ 69], 90.00th=[ 163], 95.00th=[ 247], | 99.00th=[ 393], 99.50th=[ 460], 99.90th=[ 592], 99.95th=[ 726], | 99.99th=[ 726] bw ( KiB/s): min= 8, max= 176, per=99.57%, avg=61.52, stdev=34.02, samples=239 iops : min= 2, max= 44, avg=15.38, stdev= 8.50, samples=239 lat (usec) : 1000=0.14% lat (msec) : 2=23.30%, 4=16.36%, 10=22.02%, 20=10.91%, 50=10.64% lat (msec) : 100=6.55%, 250=7.25%, 500=2.64%, 750=0.19% cpu : usr=0.02%, sys=0.56%, ctx=3603, majf=0, minf=15 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=1762,1839,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=58.7KiB/s (60.1kB/s), 58.7KiB/s-58.7KiB/s (60.1kB/s-60.1kB/s), io=7048KiB (7217kB), run=120075-120075msec WRITE: bw=61.3KiB/s (62.7kB/s), 61.3KiB/s-61.3KiB/s (62.7kB/s-62.7kB/s), io=7356KiB (7533kB), run=120075-120075msec ``` ### Case 13 - Input ``` [global] bs=256K iodepth=64 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=4 name=raw-write rw=write size=1G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test6 ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 256KiB-256KiB, (W) 256KiB-256KiB, (T) 256KiB-256KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64 ... fio-3.28 Starting 4 processes job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB) Jobs: 4 (f=4): [W(4)][100.0%][w=507MiB/s][w=2028 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=134086: Sun Feb 9 13:53:25 2025 write: IOPS=1976, BW=494MiB/s (518MB/s)(58.0GiB/120240msec); 0 zone resets slat (usec): min=50, max=14511, avg=228.18, stdev=388.04 clat (msec): min=3, max=1838, avg=129.21, stdev=112.81 lat (msec): min=3, max=1838, avg=129.44, stdev=112.81 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 20], 5.00th=[ 33], 10.00th=[ 41], 20.00th=[ 55], | 30.00th=[ 69], 40.00th=[ 83], 50.00th=[ 99], 60.00th=[ 116], | 70.00th=[ 140], 80.00th=[ 178], 90.00th=[ 253], 95.00th=[ 334], | 99.00th=[ 575], 99.50th=[ 693], 99.90th=[ 1062], 99.95th=[ 1217], | 99.99th=[ 1519] bw ( KiB/s): min=210432, max=797184, per=100.00%, avg=506612.46, stdev=25013.38, samples=960 iops : min= 822, max= 3114, avg=1978.83, stdev=97.73, samples=960 lat (msec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.14%, 20=1.01%, 50=15.55%, 100=34.54% lat (msec) : 250=38.47%, 500=8.77%, 750=1.15%, 1000=0.25%, 2000=0.12% cpu : usr=1.47%, sys=9.46%, ctx=64617, majf=0, minf=39458 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.9% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=0,237694,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=64 Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=494MiB/s (518MB/s), 494MiB/s-494MiB/s (518MB/s-518MB/s), io=58.0GiB (62.3GB), run=120240-120240msec ``` ### Case 14 - random read latency on 100G file Input ``` [global] bs=4K iodepth=1 direct=1 ioengine=libaio group_reporting time_based runtime=120 numjobs=1 name=readlatency-test-job rw=randread size=100G [job1] filename=/scratch/users/k2256813/benchmark/test_100G ``` Output ``` job1: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1 fio-3.28 Starting 1 process job1: Laying out IO file (1 file / 102400MiB) Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=148KiB/s][r=37 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] job1: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=236406: Sun Feb 9 13:59:13 2025 read: IOPS=26, BW=105KiB/s (108kB/s)(12.3MiB/120086msec) slat (usec): min=107, max=325, avg=178.93, stdev=27.32 clat (usec): min=1709, max=869548, avg=37807.73, stdev=51401.37 lat (usec): min=1871, max=869718, avg=37986.95, stdev=51402.18 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 7], 5.00th=[ 12], 10.00th=[ 14], 20.00th=[ 16], | 30.00th=[ 18], 40.00th=[ 20], 50.00th=[ 21], 60.00th=[ 23], | 70.00th=[ 29], 80.00th=[ 43], 90.00th=[ 81], 95.00th=[ 128], | 99.00th=[ 257], 99.50th=[ 338], 99.90th=[ 468], 99.95th=[ 709], | 99.99th=[ 869] bw ( KiB/s): min= 8, max= 200, per=100.00%, avg=106.22, stdev=35.73, samples=238 iops : min= 2, max= 50, avg=26.55, stdev= 8.93, samples=238 lat (msec) : 2=0.13%, 4=0.54%, 10=2.21%, 20=43.09%, 50=37.17% lat (msec) : 100=9.36%, 250=6.42%, 500=0.98%, 750=0.06%, 1000=0.03% cpu : usr=0.02%, sys=0.50%, ctx=3161, majf=0, minf=14 IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwts: total=3161,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=105KiB/s (108kB/s), 105KiB/s-105KiB/s (108kB/s-108kB/s), io=12.3MiB (12.9MB), run=120086-120086msec ```

    Import from clipboard

    Paste your markdown or webpage here...

    Advanced permission required

    Your current role can only read. Ask the system administrator to acquire write and comment permission.

    This team is disabled

    Sorry, this team is disabled. You can't edit this note.

    This note is locked

    Sorry, only owner can edit this note.

    Reach the limit

    Sorry, you've reached the max length this note can be.
    Please reduce the content or divide it to more notes, thank you!

    Import from Gist

    Import from Snippet

    or

    Export to Snippet

    Are you sure?

    Do you really want to delete this note?
    All users will lose their connection.

    Create a note from template

    Create a note from template

    Oops...
    This template has been removed or transferred.
    Upgrade
    All
    • All
    • Team
    No template.

    Create a template

    Upgrade

    Delete template

    Do you really want to delete this template?
    Turn this template into a regular note and keep its content, versions, and comments.

    This page need refresh

    You have an incompatible client version.
    Refresh to update.
    New version available!
    See releases notes here
    Refresh to enjoy new features.
    Your user state has changed.
    Refresh to load new user state.

    Sign in

    Forgot password

    or

    By clicking below, you agree to our terms of service.

    Sign in via Facebook Sign in via Twitter Sign in via GitHub Sign in via Dropbox Sign in with Wallet
    Wallet ( )
    Connect another wallet

    New to HackMD? Sign up

    Help

    • English
    • 中文
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • 日本語
    • Español
    • Català
    • Ελληνικά
    • Português
    • italiano
    • Türkçe
    • Русский
    • Nederlands
    • hrvatski jezik
    • język polski
    • Українська
    • हिन्दी
    • svenska
    • Esperanto
    • dansk

    Documents

    Help & Tutorial

    How to use Book mode

    Slide Example

    API Docs

    Edit in VSCode

    Install browser extension

    Contacts

    Feedback

    Discord

    Send us email

    Resources

    Releases

    Pricing

    Blog

    Policy

    Terms

    Privacy

    Cheatsheet

    Syntax Example Reference
    # Header Header 基本排版
    - Unordered List
    • Unordered List
    1. Ordered List
    1. Ordered List
    - [ ] Todo List
    • Todo List
    > Blockquote
    Blockquote
    **Bold font** Bold font
    *Italics font* Italics font
    ~~Strikethrough~~ Strikethrough
    19^th^ 19th
    H~2~O H2O
    ++Inserted text++ Inserted text
    ==Marked text== Marked text
    [link text](https:// "title") Link
    ![image alt](https:// "title") Image
    `Code` Code 在筆記中貼入程式碼
    ```javascript
    var i = 0;
    ```
    var i = 0;
    :smile: :smile: Emoji list
    {%youtube youtube_id %} Externals
    $L^aT_eX$ LaTeX
    :::info
    This is a alert area.
    :::

    This is a alert area.

    Versions and GitHub Sync
    Get Full History Access

    • Edit version name
    • Delete

    revision author avatar     named on  

    More Less

    Note content is identical to the latest version.
    Compare
      Choose a version
      No search result
      Version not found
    Sign in to link this note to GitHub
    Learn more
    This note is not linked with GitHub
     

    Feedback

    Submission failed, please try again

    Thanks for your support.

    On a scale of 0-10, how likely is it that you would recommend HackMD to your friends, family or business associates?

    Please give us some advice and help us improve HackMD.

     

    Thanks for your feedback

    Remove version name

    Do you want to remove this version name and description?

    Transfer ownership

    Transfer to
      Warning: is a public team. If you transfer note to this team, everyone on the web can find and read this note.

        Link with GitHub

        Please authorize HackMD on GitHub
        • Please sign in to GitHub and install the HackMD app on your GitHub repo.
        • HackMD links with GitHub through a GitHub App. You can choose which repo to install our App.
        Learn more  Sign in to GitHub

        Push the note to GitHub Push to GitHub Pull a file from GitHub

          Authorize again
         

        Choose which file to push to

        Select repo
        Refresh Authorize more repos
        Select branch
        Select file
        Select branch
        Choose version(s) to push
        • Save a new version and push
        • Choose from existing versions
        Include title and tags
        Available push count

        Pull from GitHub

         
        File from GitHub
        File from HackMD

        GitHub Link Settings

        File linked

        Linked by
        File path
        Last synced branch
        Available push count

        Danger Zone

        Unlink
        You will no longer receive notification when GitHub file changes after unlink.

        Syncing

        Push failed

        Push successfully