Sigp Lighthouse team: Pectra views

Summary of the intersection of Lighthouse's team members' opinions towards an EIP set for Electra. Lighthouse is a consensus client, so views as strongest on CL EIPs.

TLDR: Scaling remains the top priority. For Electra, the EIP set should be heavier on the CL side to allow EL's to catch up with verkle.

Strongly in favor of inclusion

Universal agreement on highest priorization

• EIP-7594 (PeerDAS): Strong consensus on prioritizing. The team agrees on a progressive path to danksharding, starting with 1D PeerDAS. Some preference to not increase the blob count target before shipping PeerDAS, to maintain the same bandwidth as dencun.

In favor of inclusion

Scattered opinions or not as strongly motivated. Listed in numerical order

• EIP-6110 (deposits): Worth doing, but not time sensitive. Tightens the security of the chain + drop technical debt.
• EIP-7002 (EL exits): In favour of prioritizing, acknowledging its relevance for permissionless staking pools. Defer complexity assessment to EL teams.
• EIP-7251 (Max EB): Should be a high priority. May include all MaxEB features to accelerate consolidation or split into two MaxEB phases to contain complexity.
• EIP-7547 (Inclusion lists): Want to see it happen, but unclear about its complexity. The lifecycle of an inclusion list touches a lot of areas of the client
• EIP-7549 (Attestation index): Worth doing, not complex can fit in the fork.