--- tags: CR-future --- :::danger The page below is for the facilitor (you can still read if you are interested). # Go straight to https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN2zliSI=/ ::: # Meeting format goals - create welcoming environment - make sure that we can develop ideas further and that not one person dominates discussion - 1-1 meetings miss the part where you create ideas from ideas - fully separate idea creation (all ideas are great!) from idea filtering/selection (both can go into different meetings) - Facilitator should focus on facilitating (otherwise facilitator opinion can become group opinions) ## Tools - https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN2zliSI=/ - visually separate areas - concept board (sticky notes require to be space efficient and allow to create visual clusters and moving); Miro can be the tool - make questions smaller - start with everybody taking notes by themselves ("me"; for ourselves) - second step: formalize and place on concept board ("we"; randomized 1-1 pairs) - third step: we review and discuss as a group ("us") - make sure that the facilitator understood what the group wanted - time-keeping is important (keep things short and on time) - divergence, then convergence - consider voting ## Questions - "Needs": In your current position, what do you need in order to be able to contribute to the project 1 year from now? (in terms of work time, financing, governance, administration, accounting, leadership) - "Wants" What do you wish from the project in terms of lesson portfolio, format, and collaboration in order to still be around 1 year from now? ## Timeline - 5 min: Welcome and get everybody on the concept board - 5 min: Everyone adds themselves to the board, tries to navigate, tries to create new sticky notes - 10 min: "me" time (divergence) - 20 min: "we" time - 10 min: "us" time (convergence) - 5 min: voting - 5 min: conclusions and next steps ## References and for some other time - Previous article by rkdarst: ["CodeRefinery idea for the future"](/l9rOEa5eSjSXNa_5xqEqDA) Good questions: - How to keep the operations sustainable? - How the organisations that are our members' employers see if we go commercial? Monetisation models: - Coursera etc. courses (passive income from paid certificates, use that to fund open source ops) - Paid tailored courses - SoMe content to guide people into our content - YouTube ads - promo deals - in-kind contributions Funding opportunities: - https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/home – the RISE calls but you can also search for your institutions. - https://www.esciencecenter.nl/ - https://e-science.se/ – are good options as well. - The focus is European fundings via European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) – https://eosc-portal.eu/funding https://www.vr.se/english/mandates/open-science/open-access-to-research-data/european-open-science-cloud---eosc.html CR Workshop in the future: - https://hackmd.io/@coderefinery/cr_ws_future About GitHub and FOSS: - [The topic in Zulip about ethics of GitHub and FOSS](https://coderefinery.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/119815-general/topic/Is.20GitHub.20bad.3F) links a [blog from Software freedom concervancy](https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/jun/30/give-up-github-launch/) that urges FOSS community to consider alternatives to GitHub. Our workshop should follow the trends and we could have our lessons be compatible with other systems as well.