# DRAFT - Impact NFTs and verifiable impact claims Inspired by the work of Grassroots Economics and Curve Labs, and thinking about “certifications (NFT’s) that can can be attested by organizations and individuals in the community” and creating “a generalized framework with which we can do the measurements” … Impact NFTs represent verifiable impact claims made by individuals and groups. ## Impact claims Ultimately impact claims can be about anything an individual perceives as “impact”. Interested to explore both physical and conceptual forms of impact … To start, consider physical impact. Suppose a team were maintaining a hiking trail, to keep a passable route and mitigate erosion and other forms of damage to the local area. The team goes out and works on a certain segment of trail. When they have finished the work and believe the trail to be appropriately maintained, they can then create these impact claims through a mobile application. To create an impact claim and optionally mint an Impact NFT, information is provided about the impact made and the process of creating it. This could be written words, form inputs, numerical information or any sensor readings, including photo, video and audio. These pieces of evidence are attached to the claim and written to the IPFS. The claim is made when the individual signs the root CID or hash of the impact claim document. These claims can be kept private or published to a readable smart contract. (I believe ixo has given this a lot of thought - I'm not very familiar with their approach. Also Regen Network is already doing something similar, though again I don't know details.) ## Impact NFTs Impact claims in and of themselves may prove an interesting primitive. If an impact claim is published to a smart contract, an Impact NFT could be minted for the individual making the claim. Think of this as a tokenized DID (decentralized identifier), which resolves to a DID document containing information about the impact claim, including evidence, metadata and identities of the individuals involved. What could be done with this Impact NFT? (This is also possible with private impact claims, using a peerwise DID method.) ### Impact verification claims Impact verifiers can examine the impact claim’s evidence (like [IBISA Network](https://ibisa.network/)'s "[Watchers](https://ibisa.network/become-watcher/)"). If they believe the evidence does demonstrate the intended impact, they can issue a verifiable credential for the impact claim, an “impact VC”. By submitting these verification claims to the Impact NFT smart contract, the impact claim will publicly accrue value in the form of social recognition and acceptance. This recognition and the evidence it is derived from is all verifiable. At what point is the Impact NFT considered “verified”, enabling the impact claimants to claim a bounty? This depends on the situation. Unsolicited impact claims - that were not created in response to a posted bounty - could receive donations after the impact was created at anyone's discretion. Alternatively, bounties could incentivize system participants to work to make impact, likely defined by the supplier of bounty capital (or some representative). The opportunity space here is quite broad - once an individual or group posts a bounty to create and document some impact, there are possibly an infinite number of permutations that can be created. To make an impact verification claim (confusingly represented as impact VCs - verifiable credentials), an impact claim’s evidence needs to be assessed. Both sensor and semantic data provided by the creator of the impact claim would be analyzed by human and software agents trained to assess levels of impact. An indication of their assessment of the impact claim would be included in the impact VC they issue (with their digital signature). In simple cases, this would be a boolean approval or rejection, or some normalized continuous variable - rating 1 to 10. These verification agents might include algorithms (including machine learning) to detect forest or reef health, or stored carbon or greenhouse gas levels, and so on. Verification claims may also represent human assessment of a photo or video recording, or of a written or spoken description of the work and outcome. In rare, high value cases, people (or drones) could even travel to the site to inspect the work firsthand. It seems simplest for humans and software agents to remotely provide attestations of local impact as documented in the evidence - especially early on, as the technology and our understanding of it develop in tandem. It seems that the more genuine ways an impact claim is assessed (and therefore the more impact verification VCs issued on a claim), the better. In many cases, making these impact assessments would be an entirely automated, others entirely based on human inputs, and even others a blend. Regardless, often these impact targets and how they should be measured would be defined beforehand - likely by the participants posting the bounty. As impact bounties increase in value, more sophisticated & reliable ways of measuring impact will help to ensure the safety of these cryptoeconomic systems. ### Applications A simple Impact NFT would require a single approval from some account (externally owned or contract, including DAOs). This boolean value could permit the impact creator to transfer the bounty from the contract to their address. More sophisticated Impact NFTs are even more exciting. Bounty contributions could earn yield while waiting to be earned and claimed. Large capital pools might form, governed by a DAO oriented towards achieve some broad impact. Bounties could be posted in response to real time needs by experts, decoupled from funders. Yield generated could help fund a universal basic income (or sustainability-linked UBI), among other things. Capital could be released before impact claims are made to fund project work. This could be permissioned or permissionless, but probably would usually require approval after some communication between the individuals wanting to accept a bounty and the funders. Impact workers could then use the funding to procure tools and materials, and possibly human support. When they submit an impact claim, individuals could receive some proportion of reward on submission, and additional parts of the bounty could be transferred or streamed based on milestone impact verifications. This includes time-bound verifications - some projects are meant to achieve some “permanence”, which can only be measured in the future. This means that impact claimants might receive dividends from their impact claims long after they created the impact. --- These Impact NFTs could serve as a tool to support our transition to sustainability. Of course, the ethics and cryptoeconomics of this type of protocol are very delicate, and should be considered deeply before this concept is deployed at any scale. ✨
Last changed by  
 
Astral
Researching Web3 x spatial

Read more

Notes on local currencies

A strong movement is forming around the idea of local, complementary or community inclusion currencies. The theory is that if we can create a container within which economic value can circulate, local groups can continue to create and exchange value regardless of the global economic climate. Why should a town or village suffer if some systemic vulnerability causes a downturn in global equity markets? Surely those individuals are still able to create the same value they could before a recession? Of course, defining a market and its boundaries is a subjective exercise. Boundaries only exist in our minds. They are still real, though, and defining meaningful boundaries allows us to study and understand the dynamics of systems internally, and within a broader multi-system tapestry. I say this while still acknowledging that ultimately all "systems" collapse into one system — the universe, in this moment. Still, drawing distinctions helps us understand patterns. The collapse of many of our cultural systems into one is more true today than ever before. We can now communicate globally in what is effectively realtime — information can move at the speed of light, and the economy is now truly a global one. This interconnectedness carries opportunities and risks in equal measure, and how we design our systems of value flow has great bearing on the safety, justice and equity of money — whether finance serves to enhance human flourishing or undermine it. Over the past decades, a rich range of experiments in implementing local currencies has naturally and organically emerged. Rarely are these projects initiated by central governments or banks — they typically are driven by local leaders seeking to enhance the flow economic value within a local community. These community initiatives have been classified as "local exchange traded systems (LETS)", and share common design patterns in their numerous implementations all around the world. As our digital systems have matured and information technologies have become ubiquitous, irrevocable tools underpinning human society in the 20th and 21st centuries, perhaps the most significant development has been the digitization of finance. Money is finally revealing its true nature: it is fundamentally an information technology. The value of a coin lies primarily in the stamp it possesses, rather than the actual gold it contains. This stamp is data, which carries information about its origin and legitimacy.

4/2/2022
Astral

For the past few years we’ve been investigating what we see as a new galaxy in the Web3 universe, at the intersection of spatial data and consensus technologies. We've explored the boundaries of the design space researching, prototyping and building community. This is culminating in our work to build what we now see as the key primitives to underpin a new category of Web3 applications using spatial and location data. Our work at Astral is focused on promoting the evolution of an open, human-centered and composable location-based decentralized web. The opportunity space is pretty vast. We believe that the vision for the user-controlled internet is incomplete without peer-to-peer alternatives to services like Uber, Google Maps, Airbnb, Tinder, Craigslist, Amazon and others. Even more exciting is the opportunity to replicate the functionality required for systems of local taxation, voting, and physical security. Perhaps the most exciting of all is the notion that our systems of value exchange can be configured to promote the preservation of life and ecological health — the nascent "regenerative finance", or ReFi, movement, leveraging natural capital currencies and other tokenized natural assets. We've been finding that all of this is possible if we can reliably tie information about physical reality — where someone or something is, or measures of environmental conditions — to smart contracts, especially contracts capable of computational geometry. Rather than working at the application layer, at Astral we are designing open source tools, public goods intended to underpin this category to A: make building location-based dapps easier, B: create spatial data storage systems fit for web3 (i.e. verifiable, uncensorable, permissionless, etc). We believe that if the ecosystem can converge on using these tools and design patterns, the location-based decentralized web will exhibit similar emergent composability that we're witnessing in DeFi. So what does this specifically mean? We're developing verifiable spatial data registries, smart-contract based registries of vector or raster spatial data assets. Initially this was to store polygons representing geographic jurisdictions on chain, though we see use cases for points, lines, polyhedra and raster datasets as well. More here →

10/14/2021
Verifiable Spatial Data Registries

At Astral we’ve been exploring the use of spatial and location data technologies on the decentralized web for a few years now - researching, experimenting, prototyping, writing and community building. A number of early pioneers - FOAM, IBISA Network, Geo Web, Grassroots Economics, among several others - further validate our conclusion that a broad range of useful applications exist at the intersection of these two technology domains. Our work experimenting and prototyping[1], [2], [3], [4] has led us to identify a few tools and standards that we think would dramatically lower barriers to entry for application developers hoping to build with location / spatial data. Our intuition is that if we can identify and build versatile tools, devs will be able to build and innovate more quickly. A powerful second order effect of the adoption of shared tools and standards: the location-based decentralized web could develop the same properties of seamless composability that are emerging in DeFi. Specifically, we’ve discovered that many location-based dapps have a need for what we’re calling verifiable spatial data registries. A verifiable spatial data registry is simply a smart contract that contains a registry of spatial data objects, such as vector features (i.e. points, lines, polygons or polyhedrons), or raster spatiotemporal assets (i.e. satellite images, LIDAR scans, etc.) Different applications will require spatial data registries with various different properties and functionality. We’ve been exploring this design space, and intend to develop and publish verifiable spatial data registries that fulfill commonly-seen requirements. We suspect that there may be a strong case to adopt an ERC standard for these verifiable spatial data registries, so that secure contracts can be developed and so interoperable tooling can mature. So what does this really mean? It probably will help to illustrate with examples and use cases, categorized into vector and raster data.

10/11/2021
DRAFT: ESP Astral Application

Project Name The Astral Protocol Project Description What are you working on? What does success look like for your project? (2-3 short paragraphs) At Astral we are building tools to underpin the location-based decentralized web. We’ve been exploring the opportunity space for some time - we’ve prototyped a number of diverse dapps and protocols that use spatial and location data. For example, we designed the Hyperaware Protocol, a spatial governance protocol for connected devices, and built a prototype implementation to create a trust minimized, decentralized system of congestion zones. We also prototyped a spatial finance application that ties a smart contract to measurements of air quality in a particular geographic area. We have experimented building a location-aware wallet that could support local currencies.

6/23/2021
Read more from Astral
Published on HackMD