礙於技術限制,各項公式未能個別標註出處。
參考文獻統一排列於「Reference」節。
學術引用時務必完整標示所有文獻。
For any , , , and , a Horadam sequence is , where satisfies the following second-order linear homogeneous recurrence relation:
We can also write
A Haradam sequences is trivial if or .
From now on, we suppose that .
First few terms of : , , , , , .
For any and , Lucas sequences of the first kind and the second kind are, respectively,
In the rest of this article, we use , , and to denote those sequences.
If necessary, we write , , and to avoid ambiguity.
First few terms of the sequences:
Name | Definition | OEIS |
---|---|---|
Fibonacci numbers | A000045 | |
Lucas numbers | A000032 | |
Pell numbers | A000129 | |
Jacobsthal numbers | A001045 | |
A001109 | ||
A002275 | ||
The and are the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and the second kind, respectively.
The generating function of the sequence is
The generating function of a sequence is the formal power series .
If we are in some good fields like complex numbers, then we can use the closed-form expression to show some properties about a given sequence.
However, if we are in some general module, we may not have such good tools.
Fortunately, almost all of the properties about the Horadam sequences can be proved by induction :D.
The polynomial , which is called the characteristic polynomial of the sequence , has two roots:
where .
Note that iff .
If so, we call it the degenerate case.
Certainly we have , , and .
Let and for .
Then we have
Also, we have , where .
In any world having the mathematical induction, there is a induction that can apply to Horadam sequences.
Let be a statement involving .
Then holds for any if it satisfies the following:
Not only in the integers, we can define the Haradam sequences over any left -module where and .
Also, every properties about the Horadam sequences have a corresponding right analog.
A right Horadam sequence is , where satisfies the recurrence relation
We write if and commute under multiplication, i.e., .
Note that Lucas sequences can only be defined in and .
Let and
.
Then we have the recurrence relations
Let where , and let , then
Let .
If and , we have
Thus, since and , we have by induction.
Moreover,
Let be a collection of functions satisfying (and ).
Where .
Let , where ranges over .
In combinatorics, the set is the set of multipermutations of objects such that each object occurs times in each multipermutation.
In other words, the set is the set of permutations of the multiset , where each is of multiplicity .
If we write for , then we have
and .
Let , then we have
Moreover, if , we have
If is again a unit (i.e., is invertible), then we have
The is only for convenience, since if .
Let .
Then we have and .
And we also get the recurrence relation
Therefore by induction.
Let , then we have
This is to say that .
If , then we have
Let denote the product , and .
The product is an element in the tensor product .
The notation here is only for convenience :P.
Note that if and , then .
For any , , and , we have
I think that this is more readable instead of
We have
Continue in this manner, then we get the result.
Similarly, if , then we have
If , then for any , , , , and , we have
If , then we have .
Since , , and , by the product formula, we have
Thus, since , we have
Continue in this manner, we get .
Since and are always independent in our derivations, we can actually factor out from and confidently say .
Let and .
If , then
That is to say, the subsequence of a Horadam sequence of which indices form an arithmetic progression, is again a Horadam sequence.
Let .
It is sufficient to show that .
Let and , then we have
Thus we get .
Then we have
which form a recurrence relation and gives .
Therefore, since the is cancellative (why?), we get
If , then we have
If , then
Work In Progress…
礙於技術限制,各項公式未能個別標註出處。
參考文獻按數學論文慣例,以字母順序統一排列於下。
學術引用時務必完整標示所有文獻。