* 1. - [ ] LCCWG Moderation Subcommittee Scope of Work Proposal # Scope of Work - Background This proposal was developed by OpenStreetMap volunteers who came together to define the work to be completed by the Moderation Subcommittee, a sub-group of the Local Chapters and Communities Working Group (LCCWG). Learn more about other focus items of the LCCWG [here](https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_Chapters_and_Communities_Working_Group). The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) Board [set out to](https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2020/12/11/message-from-osmf-board-chair-on-mailing-list-behavior/) "find partners to help instate a moderator team for the OSMF-talk and talk mailing lists". In their December 2020 meeting, the OSMF Board requested that the LCCWG take the lead on this initiative and subsequently this group has been formed. This group of volunteers is not the moderation team that the Board has asked for, instead we have committed to help set it up. We wholeheartedly agree with the Board that when established "these moderators need to have the trust of the community". As such we kindly ask for feedback on today's proposals as this is how we will ensure we are on the right path. The kind support of a few initial volunteers has enabled us to have a proposal ready for review, but we will continue to need support and hope to include representation from all parts of the OSM community. Please reach out if you are interested in being involved with this work. # Committee Scope of Work We aim to be inclusive by addressing and incorporating feedback. As such we are open to adjusting to your input on the process and content as we co-create. | You said: | We will: | | -------- | -------- | | This moderator team should start to work on enforcing the current Etiquette guidelines as soon as possible. <br />***Source**: OSMF Board [statement](https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2020/12/11/message-from-osmf-board-chair-on-mailing-list-behavior/).*<br /><br />Implementation is required across all OSM community channels/spheres (mailing lists, social media, communication channels including Weekly OSM, local and regional chat groups, events, and chapter coordination).<br /> ***Source**: "Immediate changes" section of the call for action [open letter](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:A_Call_to_Take_Action_and_Confront_Systemic_Offensive_Behaviour_in_the_OSM_Community.pdf).*| Part 1. Define a process for moderation of the [Etiquette Guidelines](https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Etiquette) that will apply initially to just the osmf-talk & talk mailing lists. <br /><br />Part 2. Recruit moderators into a moderation team that can moderate communications channels and respond to complaints. <br /><br />Part 3. Review existing moderation support material and make recommendations. | Work on updating/replacing our Etiquette rules, which must focus on balancing all participants’ interests. <br />***Source**: OSMF Board [statement](https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2020/12/11/message-from-osmf-board-chair-on-mailing-list-behavior/).*<br /><br />The existing [Code of Etiquette](https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Etiquette) needs to be replaced by a strong Code of Conduct. <br />***Source**: "Immediate changes" section of the call for action [open letter](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:A_Call_to_Take_Action_and_Confront_Systemic_Offensive_Behaviour_in_the_OSM_Community.pdf).* | Review existing Etiquette Guidelines and redefine based on OpenStreetMap's mission and values, today's cultural norms, a review of other community codes of conduct and etiquette, and community feedback.<br /><br />Note: We remain open-minded as to whether this will be a revision of the Etiquette Guidelines or an entirely new document (e.g. a "Code of Conduct")| |The OSMF should restructure governance to be more equitable: an example of this would be committing to Board Seat allocation for OSMF members who are women and non-binary, and who are citizens of Low and Middle Income Countries. <br />***Source**: "Immediate changes" section of the call for action [open letter]oo(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiyki/File:A_Call_to_Take_Action_and_Confront_Systemic_Offensive_Behaviour_in_the_OSM_Community.pdf).*| We will not address this. However in establishing a moderation team we aspire to ensure the make-up is representive of society as a whole. | > [] > [] |Further changes should form part of OSMFs agenda over the coming 1-2 years. <br />***Source**: "Further changes" section of the call for action [open letter](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:A_Call_to_Take_Action_and_Confront_Systemic_Offensive_Behaviour_in_the_OSM_Community.pdf).*| These are outside of the scope of our group and we will not be addressing them. > []> [name=Nelson Arias] ## An Iterative Process We will design an iterative process that we estimate will involve at least two cycles of moderation design, implementation on community lists, and feedback from the community. We plan to undertake the 'process for moderation' and 'etiquette guideline revision' work in parallel (subject to enough volunteer support). This process will require sufficient time for committee meetings, consultation with communities, research, feedback and OSMF board review. We estimate that the work will take approximately 6 months, but we will propose a more detailed workflow following community consultation. ## A Commitment to Community Participation Your participation and support is required to shape and strengthen this initiative. Feedback is welcome and encouraged, and we intend to involve you throughout this process. Please reach out to local@openstreetmap.org if you are interested in joining the subcommittee to support this work. You will have many opportunities to review and provide feedback on draft documents. The first task for the Subcommittee will be to develop a detailed workflow that outlines opportunities for your participation. The stages of involvement will differ according to the scale of each task, but you can expect to see stages related to initial evidence gathering, review of work in progress, followed by reviews of the proposed outcome across increasingly wider groups of the OpenStreetMap community. What's the best way for us to consult with you and/or your local community? Your input will be integral to developing the strongest workflow. We will try our best to provide opportunities for participation without exhausting you with too many messages or questions.
Last changed by  
 
Maggie
3909

Read more

Trails Working Group - Pilot Feedback 2022-2023

Announcment post https://www.openstreetmap.us/2022/05/osmus-trails-wg-pilot What Did We Learn communicating the work can be difficult workflow is difficult Mapping & Other Issues workflow can be a little clunky to compare with external data sources first pilot misses national park land still questions around if what we're doing does what we really need

3/21/2023
2022 - Virtual Local Chapters & Communities Congress

Program Link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Local_Chapters_Congress/2022 Adding yourself You can edit the page by pressing the little pen symbol in the upper left corner. Attendees (please sign in) Maggie Cawley, OSM US & LCCWG Jonathan Beliën, OSM Belgium & LCCWG Joost Schouppe, OSM Belgium & LCCWG

11/12/2022
Etiquette Guidelines Public Discussion

September 4, 2021 Attendees Heather Leson Amanda McCann Mikko Tamura 2 others that did not identify here Agenda Discussion on the Etiquette Guidelines Revision

11/10/2021
Implementation Plan Proposed by the LCCWG Moderation Subcommittee

This Implementation Plan is based on the subcommittee Scope of Work that was presented to the community at the January OSMF meeting. It has been split into two distinct elements. We plan to progress the ‘Process for moderation’ and ‘Revision of the Etiquette Guideline’ work in parallel subject to enough volunteer support. Our goal is to complete all work by the end of July 2021. This estimate is based on time required to allow for thorough research, bi-monthly subcommittee meetings, community consultation and feedback, and OSMF board review. These efforts have been defined separately below. Community Involvement We want to balance visibility against the feeling of exhaustion from being copied in too many messages or asked too many questions. We therefore created four groups that will be consulted and involved in the process to a different degree than the others. Participation will be defined as part of the workflow set out below. Subcommittee: Join the subcommittee to attend bi-monthly meetings, develop draft documents, respond to comments and drive the process. Reviewer: Provide the Subcommittee with early, timely input on initial draft materials. We invite the Review Group to include the OSMF Working Groups, OSMF Local Chapters and other established communities, in addition to self-nominated individuals. Community: Individuals interested in being notified when final drafts are ready for community input. Everyone who wants to provide feedback will be considered part of this group, but if you want an email when a draft is ready please sign up and let us know.

9/8/2021
Read more from Maggie
Published on HackMD