The solutions may not detailed enough or may have some errors. Welcome to edit it to make it better.
Book Information
Authors: Phillip Kaye, Raymond Laflamme, Michele Mosca
Edition: 1st
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publish Date: 2007/01/18 (yyyy/mm/dd)
ISBN-10: 019857049X
ISBN-13: 978-0198570493
Exercise 1.5.1
Question
A sequence of CNOT gates with the target bits all initialized to 0 is the simplest way to copy an -bit string stored in the control bits. However, more sophisticated copy operations are also possible, such as a circuit that treats a string as the binary representation of the integer and adds modulo to the copy register (modular arithmetic is defined in Section 7.3.2).
Describe a reversible 4-bit circuit that adds modulo 4 the integer represented in binary in the first two bits to the integer represented in binary in the last two bits.
Answer
Not yet
Exercise 2.3.1
Question
Prove that the trace has the cyclic property .
Answer
Exercise 2.3.2
Question
Using the result of the previous exercise, together with the fact that a change of orthonormal basis can be written as a unitary operator, show that is independent of the basis in which it is expressed. Notice that in the matrix representation, equals the sum of the diagonal entries of the square matrix representing .
Answer
If the unitary operator 's columns are composed by the new basis representing in the original basis, the transformed , which is represented as is
Calculate trace of the both sides.
The trace doesn't change after changing the basis. This result holds for all linear independent basis.
Q.E.D.
Exercise 3.2.1
Question
Show that (3.2.12) is a solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation.
Answer
From Schrödinger equation
we can get the general solution of is
where is a time-independent state. Substituting by and , we get
Q.E.D.
Exercise 3.3.1
Question
Consider the 2-qubit state
Show that this state is entangled by proving that there are no possible values , , , such that
(Note, the state above is called an EPR pair, named for Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, who considered such states in their investigations of quantum mechanics.)
Answer
Exercise 3.4.1
Question
(a) Prove that if the operators satisfy and , then for all .
(b) Prove that any pure state can be decomposed as where , , and . Also prove that .
(c) Prove that any decomposition of the identity operator on a Hilbert space of dimension into a sum of nonzero projectors can have at most terms in the sum.
Answer
(a) This statement is not true. Here is a counter-example.
To make the statement true, we have to add one more condition.
Each , where , is a matrix and statifies .
In fact, is the image of . Because, for every , the summation of projected equals itself,
When , because is normalized. Combined these two cases, we get
Q.E.D.
(c)
Denote the -dimension Hilbert space as .
and each are in . There are at most linear independent vector in a -dimension Hilbert space. If there is term in the sum, can be represent as the linear combination of the other terms.
And because is not zero in our assumption, there must be an . Assume .
We get a contradictory result, so it has at most N terms in the sum.
Q.E.D
Exercise 3.4.2
Question
Show that measuring the observable is equivalent to measuring the observable up to a relabelling of the measurement outcomes.
Answer
Exercise 3.4.3
Question
Verify that a measurement of the Pauli observable is equivalent to a complete measurement with respect to the basis basis.
Answer
Exercise 3.4.4
Question
(a) Prove that performing a projective measurement with respect to and (defined above) on an -qubit state is equivalent to measuring the observable .
(b) Explain why performing a complete Von Neumann measurement with respect to the computation basis, and then outputting the parity of the resulting string is not equivalent to performing a projective measurement of the parity.
Answer
Exercise 3.4.5
Question
The observable formalism gives a convenient way to describe the expected value of a quantum measurement, where the eigenvalues correspond to some relevant physical quantity. Such expectation values are particularly relevant for quantum experiments (particularly the early ones) where one does not measure individual quantum systems, but rather an ensemble of many independent and identically prepared systems, and where the measurement apparatus provides only cumulative results (e.g. the net magnetic field induced by an ensemble of nuclear spins). Consider a projective measurement described by projectors , and suppose we measure the state . Show that the expected value of is
Answer
Exercise 3.5.1
Question
Find the density matrices of the following states: (a) (b) (c)
Answer
Density operator of a mixed state is .
(a)
(b)
(c)
Exercise 3.5.2
Question
(a) Prove that the density operator for an ensemble of pure states satisfies the following conditions: (i) . (ii) is a positive operator (i.e. for any , is real and non-negative; equivalently, the eigenvalues of are non-negative).
(b) Show that for any matrix satisfying conditions 1 and 2, there exists a finite list of probabilities and pure states such that is the density matrix of the mixed state
is the dimension of the state, are the eigenvalues of .
The definition of the density operator , where is the state with unit length. Let's prove the eigenvectors of are and other vectors which are orthogonal to and each other. Denote the orthogonal vectors as .
First, prove is one of the eigenvector of .
Second, prove is the eigenvector of .
Denote the corresponding eigenvalue of is and the eigenvalues to is . From the proof above, we get for and .
Q.E.D.
(ii)
From (i), we get the eigenvectors of form an orthonormal basis . We can express any vector as
And in (i), we have proved the eigenvalues of are s and , which are non-negative.
Q.E.D.
(b)
Because positive operators on are normal operators. See
can be written as a spectral decomposition by an unitary operator.
The columns of are the 's eigenvectors and is a diagonal matrix composed by the eigenvalues of . In the equations below, we use to denote the elements of the Cartesian basis.
Because , . The sum above is the finite list we need.
Q.E.D.
Exercise 3.5.3
Question
Consider any linear transformation on a Hilbert space of dimension . This linear transformation induces a transformation on the set of linear operators on the Hilbert space . Prove that the above transformation is also linear.
Answer
To prove is linear, we have to prove
Additivity:
Homogenity:
Additivity:
Q.E.D.
Homogenity:
Q.E.D.
Appendix
eigenvalues of projectors
Hermitian operator's eigenvalues are real
Prove if
, then
proof:
Because , by comparing (1) and (2), we get , hence .