The full hamiltonian is:
We assume the dominant part of the ground state wavefunction comes from
such that the unperturbed groundstate wavefunction is:
Based on this definition, we define the normal ordering operator
which practically means it orders
Under this definition of normal ordering, we define the Wick's expansion of the interaction term:
where the overline defines Wick's contraction:
The expectation value of the interaction with respect to the
where we can forget about all the normal ordered states since those give zero acting on the unperturbed groundstate. To evaluate this further, we utilize the mean-field approximation:
onto the contractions such that we get:
note
To consider excitations from the groundstate, we make use of the mean-field approximation defined above:
Where we made use of the following operations:
Without any superconducting terms, the form simplifies to:
We simplify the interaction term through the MF approximation to get:
(assuming no superconductivity)
and an additional constant part:
The interaction reads:
whereas
To make things more understandable, we are also going to explicitly split up position and spin indices:
On a fine tight-binding model, we have:
where
We shall re-define
in this notation the above reads:
The mean-field terms are:
whereas
where
That gives us:
and its expectation value gives us the mean-field … field
whereas I assumed the indices for wavefunctions
where I used the
For a tight-binding grid, the mean-field correction simplifies to:
the first term is the exchange interaction whereas the second one is the direct interaction.
Similarly, the constant offset term reads:
where we identify the first term as the exchange (mixes indices) and the right one as the direct (diagonal in indicies).
The above assumed a finite tight-binding model - all
To begin with we deconstruct a general matrix
and we will Fourier transform the upper indices into k-space:
where I assumed
Now lets rewrite our main result in the previous section using our new notation:
Lets first consider the second (direct) term. Lets express the corresponding
Notice that in the final expression, there is no
Now since
We are finally ready to Fourier transform the main result. Invoking convolution theorem and the results above gives us:
which does make sense. The first term (direct) is a potential term coming from the mean-field and the second term (exchange) is purely responsible for the hopping.
The constant offset is:
In the case of short-range interactions, it is much more convenient to go back to real space to both store objects and perform the operations. In real space the mean-field part of the Hamiltonian reads:
(the first term might need some prefactor from Fourier transformation)
where
Given an initial Hamiltonian