ltu-ili: ILI + Astro Papers

A repository for interesting papers on implicit likelihood inference (a.k.a. simulation-based inference or likelihood-free inference) and its applications in astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology.

Machine Learning

Techniques

Neural Posterior/Likelihood/Ratio Estimation

Bayesian Neural Networks

SBI Posterior Coverage / Calibration

Interpretability

Applications

Review Papers

Cosmology

Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

Neural Posterior Estimation

  • 2023 - Neural Posterior Estimation with guaranteed exact coverage: the ringdown of GW150914
    • Using SNPE with Masked Autoregressive Flows
  • 2023 - Flow Matching for Scalable Simulation-Based Inference
    • The paper builds upon the DINGO study and introduces Flow MAtching Posterior Estimation (FMPE)
    • "We represent x in frequency domain; for two LIGO detectors and complex f ∈ [20, 512] Hz, ∆f = 0.125 Hz, we have x ∈ R^{15744}": The authors do mention the use of an embedding network to compress x to 128 summaries but do not talk about SVD. They say the computation is roughly the same as DINGO.
  • 2021 - Real-Time Gravitational Wave Science with Neural Posterior Estimation
    • M.Dax presents "DINGO" in the recording of his NeurIPS talk.
    • The paper presents an application of Group-equivarient Neural Posterior Estimation GNPE.
    • The pre-processing involves saving SVD representation of frequency-domain waveform on disk, and generating noise at training time with extrinsic parameters. Then, an embedding network precedes a normalizing flow. fmin = 20 Hz ,fmax = 1024 Hz , and ∆f = 0.125 Hz
    • Waveform model is IMRPhenomPv2. The training set comprises 5 million waveforms.
    • A particularity here, appart from the novelty of GNPE to treat "translation" parameters such as coalescence time, is that merger extrinsic parameters as well as noise realizations are randomly drawn during training.
  • 2020 - Gravitational-wave parameter estimation with autoregressive neural network flows
    • Example of posterior inference on only 5 parameters at first.
    • Input data is 1 second of strain data with Fs = 1024Hz, whitened in frequency domain before IFFT and finally rescalling in the time domain (factor coming from the discretization of band-limited colored noise). * Waveform is IMRPhenomPv2.
    • 1 million data-parameter pairs, 90% for training and 10% for validation. The authors used a Conditional Variational AutoEncoder (CVAE) and a MAF.

Neural Ratio Estimation

Galaxy Properties

Select a repo