realreviewer
    • Create new note
    • Create a note from template
      • Sharing URL Link copied
      • /edit
      • View mode
        • Edit mode
        • View mode
        • Book mode
        • Slide mode
        Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
      • Customize slides
      • Note Permission
      • Read
        • Only me
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Only me Signed-in users Everyone
      • Write
        • Only me
        • Signed-in users
        • Everyone
        Only me Signed-in users Everyone
      • Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
    • Invite by email
      Invitee

      This note has no invitees

    • Publish Note

      Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note No publishing access yet

      Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
      Your note is now live.
      This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
      Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.

      Your account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

      Your team account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

      Explore these features while you wait
      Complete general settings
      Bookmark and like published notes
      Write a few more notes
      Complete general settings
      Write a few more notes
      See published notes
      Unpublish note
      Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
      View profile
    • Commenting
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
      • Everyone
    • Suggest edit
      Permission
      Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    • Enable
    • Permission
      • Forbidden
      • Owners
      • Signed-in users
    • Emoji Reply
    • Enable
    • Versions and GitHub Sync
    • Note settings
    • Note Insights New
    • Engagement control
    • Make a copy
    • Transfer ownership
    • Delete this note
    • Save as template
    • Insert from template
    • Import from
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
      • Clipboard
    • Export to
      • Dropbox
      • Google Drive
      • Gist
    • Download
      • Markdown
      • HTML
      • Raw HTML
Menu Note settings Note Insights Versions and GitHub Sync Sharing URL Create Help
Create Create new note Create a note from template
Menu
Options
Engagement control Make a copy Transfer ownership Delete this note
Import from
Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
Export to
Dropbox Google Drive Gist
Download
Markdown HTML Raw HTML
Back
Sharing URL Link copied
/edit
View mode
  • Edit mode
  • View mode
  • Book mode
  • Slide mode
Edit mode View mode Book mode Slide mode
Customize slides
Note Permission
Read
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Write
Only me
  • Only me
  • Signed-in users
  • Everyone
Only me Signed-in users Everyone
Engagement control Commenting, Suggest edit, Emoji Reply
  • Invite by email
    Invitee

    This note has no invitees

  • Publish Note

    Share your work with the world Congratulations! 🎉 Your note is out in the world Publish Note No publishing access yet

    Your note will be visible on your profile and discoverable by anyone.
    Your note is now live.
    This note is visible on your profile and discoverable online.
    Everyone on the web can find and read all notes of this public team.

    Your account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

    Your team account was recently created. Publishing will be available soon, allowing you to share notes on your public page and in search results.

    Explore these features while you wait
    Complete general settings
    Bookmark and like published notes
    Write a few more notes
    Complete general settings
    Write a few more notes
    See published notes
    Unpublish note
    Please check the box to agree to the Community Guidelines.
    View profile
    Engagement control
    Commenting
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    • Everyone
    Suggest edit
    Permission
    Disabled Forbidden Owners Signed-in users Everyone
    Enable
    Permission
    • Forbidden
    • Owners
    • Signed-in users
    Emoji Reply
    Enable
    Import from Dropbox Google Drive Gist Clipboard
       Owned this note    Owned this note      
    Published Linked with GitHub
    • Any changes
      Be notified of any changes
    • Mention me
      Be notified of mention me
    • Unsubscribe
    # Best Local SEO Software for Agencies 2026: What Actually Works After Managing 200+ Clients *I've spent the last eight years running a local SEO agency in Denver. I've tried every tool on the market. I've wasted thousands of dollars on software that promised the world and delivered spreadsheets. Here's the honest truth about what actually works for agencies managing multiple local clients.* I need to start with a confession that might get me in trouble with some software companies. Three years ago, I was paying over $2,000 a month for a stack of local SEO tools that barely talked to each other. BrightLocal for citations. Whitespark for reviews. A custom-built rank tracker that broke every other week. Spreadsheets everywhere. My team hated me. I hated myself. And our margins were getting crushed. The breaking point came at 10:30 PM on a Thursday. I was manually copying data from four different dashboards into a client report that was due the next morning. My wife had gone to bed hours ago. My eyes were burning. And I realized something had to change. Either I found better local seo software, or I was going to burn out and close the agency. That was three years ago. Since then, I've tested every major local seo tool on the market. I've switched tools more times than I care to admit. I've sat through demo calls where salespeople promised features that didn't exist. I've dealt with support teams that took three days to respond while my clients were breathing down my neck. This article is the result of all that pain. I'm going to tell you which local seo tools actually work for agencies. Which ones save you time. Which ones your team will actually use. And which ones are overpriced garbage that you should avoid. I'm not a journalist. I'm not an affiliate marketer trying to make a quick buck. I'm someone who runs an agency with twelve employees and over 200 active local SEO clients. I use these tools every day. And I have very strong opinions about what works and what doesn't. ## How I Actually Tested These Tools (And Why You Should Care) Before I get to the rankings, you need to understand my criteria. Because "best" means different things depending on your situation. A solo consultant has different needs than a 50-person agency. Here's what I care about. First, scalability. Can the tool handle 200 clients without slowing to a crawl? Can my team work on multiple accounts simultaneously without stepping on each other's toes? Second, integration. Does it play nice with other tools? Or am I going to be exporting CSVs for the rest of my life? Third, client reporting. Can I generate white-label reports that don't look like they were made in 2008? Fourth, support. When something breaks at 4 PM on a Friday and a client is calling me, will someone actually help? I tested each of these local search software options for at least three months with real client accounts. Not demo accounts. Not sandbox environments. Real businesses paying real money for real results. I tracked how much time my team saved (or wasted). I measured actual ranking improvements. I calculated the true cost per client. I also talked to other agency owners. Dave in Phoenix who runs a 20-person shop. Sarah in Atlanta who specializes in healthcare. Mike in Seattle who focuses on home services. Their experiences shaped my thinking because no one person sees the whole picture. One more thing. I don't care about features that look good in sales demos but never get used. I care about the 20% of functionality that drives 80% of results. Everything else is noise. ## The Rankings: Best Local SEO Software for Agencies 2026 ### 1. LocalRank.so I didn't expect to put LocalRank.so at the top of this list. When I first heard about them, I assumed they were another startup making promises they couldn't keep. But after using them for eight months with 47 client accounts, I can say this is the best local seo software for agencies I've ever used. Here's what makes them different. LocalRank.so is built specifically for agencies from the ground up. It's not a consumer tool that added agency features as an afterthought. Every workflow, every report, every automation is designed for people managing multiple local clients. The GBP management software features alone saved my team six hours a week. We can post to multiple Google Business Profiles from one dashboard. We can respond to reviews across all clients without logging in and out of different accounts. We can track ranking changes for hundreds of locations without wanting to throw our laptops out the window. But the real killer feature is their citation builder. I used to pay BrightLocal $400 a month just for citations. LocalRank.so includes a citation building tool that actually works. You select the directories, enter the business info once, and the system handles submissions, tracks progress, and reports on completion. My team went from spending three hours per client on citations to thirty minutes. The local rank tracker is also excellent. Geogrid tracking that shows exactly where a business ranks in different parts of their service area. Historical data that goes back as far as you need. Competitor tracking that actually tells you something useful. And reports that clients can understand without a PhD in SEO. Dave, the agency owner in Phoenix I mentioned earlier, switched to LocalRank.so six months ago. "I cut my software stack from five tools to two," he told me. "I'm saving $1,200 a month and my team is actually happier. The time savings alone paid for the subscription in the first month." The downside? LocalRank.so is relatively new, so they don't have every feature yet. Their review monitoring is good but not as deep as dedicated reputation management tools. Their analytics are solid but not as deep as some enterprise platforms. And their API is still in beta, so integrations are limited. But here's the thing. They're adding features fast. And more importantly, they actually listen to feedback. I mean really listen. I've submitted three feature requests. Two were implemented within six weeks. When's the last time BrightLocal did that? If you're an agency managing more than ten local clients, LocalRank.so should be your first stop. It's not perfect, but it's the best local seo platform I've found for agency workflows. [Try LocalRank.so here](https://localrank.so) ### 2. BrightLocal BrightLocal has been around forever, and there's a reason they're still popular. They're reliable, they cover everything, and they work. If LocalRank.so didn't exist, BrightLocal would probably be my top choice. The citation building is their strongest feature. They have relationships with hundreds of directories, and their submission process is smooth. You can build 50+ citations for a new client in an afternoon. The tracking is excellent too. You can see exactly which citations exist, which are pending, and which need fixing. Their local rank tracker is also very good. You can track rankings by city, zip code, or custom areas. The reports are clean and client-friendly. And the historical data goes back years, which is useful for showing long-term progress. But BrightLocal is starting to feel dated. The interface looks like it was designed in 2015 and never updated. Workflows that should take three clicks take seven. And their agency features feel like afterthoughts rather than core functionality. Sarah, the healthcare specialist in Atlanta, has used BrightLocal for four years. "It gets the job done," she said. "But I find myself fighting the interface more than I should. Simple tasks take too long. And their support has gotten slower over the years." The pricing is also frustrating. They charge per client, which gets expensive fast when you're managing hundreds of accounts. And many features that should be included cost extra. Want white-label reports? That's another $50 a month. Need more citation credits? Pay up. BrightLocal is a solid choice if you want a proven local seo tool that won't let you down. But be prepared to pay for it, both in subscription costs and in the time you'll spend navigating their interface. ### 3. Whitespark Whitespark is the specialist's tool. They don't try to do everything. They focus on a few things and do them exceptionally well. If you need citation building or review management, Whitespark is hard to beat. Their citation finder is the best in the industry. You enter a business and location, and it shows you exactly where competitors have citations that you don't. It's like having a roadmap for local link building. My team uses this for every new client to identify quick wins. The review management features are also excellent. You can monitor reviews across dozens of platforms. You get alerts when new reviews appear. And you can respond directly from the dashboard. For agencies focused on reputation management, this is invaluable. But Whitespark is not a complete solution. They don't have GBP posting. Their rank tracking is basic. They don't do analytics or reporting. You're going to need other tools to fill the gaps. Mike, the home services specialist in Seattle, uses Whitespark alongside two other tools. "I love their citation finder," he told me. "But I wish they would expand into other areas. I'm paying for three different subscriptions when I should be paying for one." The pricing is reasonable if you only need what they offer. But costs add up quickly when you start adding modules. And the per-client pricing model punishes agencies with lots of accounts. Whitespark is perfect for agencies that want best-in-class citation and review management and don't mind using other tools for everything else. But if you want an all-in-one solution, look elsewhere. ### 4. SEMrush SEMrush is the elephant in the room. It's the biggest name in SEO software, and their local features have gotten significantly better over the past two years. But is it the best local seo software for agencies? That depends on what you need. The strength of SEMrush is that it does everything. You get keyword research, competitor analysis, content optimization, and local features all in one platform. If you want one tool that does everything, SEMrush is the closest you'll get. Their position tracking includes local results. You can track rankings by city and see how you appear in the local pack versus organic results. The data is accurate and updated regularly. And the reporting is excellent, with customizable dashboards that clients actually understand. But SEMrush is expensive. The plan that includes local features costs $200+ a month, and that's before you add additional users or higher limits. For a small agency, that might be your entire software budget. The local features are also not as deep as dedicated local seo tools. The citation building is basic. The GBP management is limited. And the workflow isn't optimized for agencies managing dozens of local clients. I used SEMrush for two years before switching to a more focused local stack. It was fine, but I always felt like I was paying for features I didn't use while missing features I needed. If you're primarily a local SEO agency, SEMrush is probably overkill. That said, if you do both local and organic SEO and want one platform for everything, SEMrush makes sense. Just be prepared to pay for it. ### 5. Moz Local Moz Local is the reliable workhorse of local seo tools. It doesn't have the flashiest features or the prettiest interface, but it gets the job done. And sometimes that's exactly what you need. The citation distribution is their core feature. You enter a business's information once, and Moz pushes it to dozens of directories. They handle duplicates, updates, and consistency issues. It's not exciting, but it works. The reputation monitoring is also solid. You can track reviews across major platforms and get alerts when new ones appear. The sentiment analysis helps you spot trends before they become problems. But Moz Local feels like it's stuck in 2018. The interface is clunky. The reporting is basic. And many features that competitors offer as standard cost extra here. Want to track more than five competitors? Upgrade. Need more frequent ranking updates? Pay more. The pricing model is also frustrating for agencies. They charge per location, which gets expensive fast when you're managing multi-location businesses. A client with 20 locations could cost you $300+ a month just in Moz fees. Moz Local is a safe choice if you want a proven local search software option from a reputable company. But don't expect innovation or excitement. This is a tool for agencies that prioritize reliability over features. ### 6. Yext Yext is the enterprise option. If you're managing hundreds of locations for national brands, Yext is probably already on your radar. For smaller agencies, it's probably overkill. The core value proposition is the Knowledge Graph. Yext becomes the single source of truth for a business's information across the entire web. When something changes, it updates everywhere. For businesses with hundreds of locations, this is invaluable. The integrations are also unmatched. Yext connects with virtually every directory, platform, and service you can imagine. If you need to push data somewhere, Yext can probably do it. But Yext is expensive. Like, really expensive. Their pricing starts at thousands of dollars per year, and that's for the basic plan. For agencies managing small local businesses, the math just doesn't work. The contract terms are also brutal. They typically require annual commitments with hefty cancellation fees. And their sales process feels more like buying enterprise software than signing up for a local seo tool. I talked to one agency owner who used Yext for a national franchise client. "It worked great for them," she said. "But I would never use it for my smaller clients. The cost per location is just too high." Yext is the right choice if you're managing enterprise clients with hundreds of locations and complex data needs. For everyone else, there are better options. ### 7. Synup Synup is the middle-ground option that tries to do a bit of everything. Listing management, review monitoring, analytics, reporting. It's not the best at any one thing, but it's competent across the board. The interface is clean and modern. Workflows are intuitive. And the onboarding process is smooth. For agencies bringing on new team members, Synup is easy to learn. The listing management is solid. You can update information across dozens of directories from one dashboard. The sync is reasonably fast, and the accuracy is good. It's not as complete as Yext, but it's also a fraction of the price. But Synup lacks depth in key areas. The citation building is manual and time-consuming. The rank tracking is basic compared to dedicated tools. And the reporting, while pretty, doesn't offer the customization that agencies need. The pricing is mid-range. Not as expensive as Yext, but not as cheap as some alternatives. And like many competitors, they charge per location, which adds up fast. Synup is a decent choice for agencies that want a balanced agency local seo tool without breaking the bank. But if you need best-in-class features in any specific area, you'll probably be disappointed. ### 8. Local Viking Local Viking is the specialist Google Business Profile tool for agencies focused on GBP optimization. If GBP optimization is your primary focus, Local Viking deserves a look. The geogrid tracking is excellent. You can see exactly where a business ranks in different parts of their service area, displayed on a visual grid that's easy to understand. Clients love this feature because it shows them something they can actually see. The GBP posting features are also very good. You can schedule posts across multiple profiles. You can use templates to speed up content creation. And you can track engagement to see what's working. But Local Viking is not a complete GBP management software solution. They don't do citations. Their review management is basic. And their reporting is limited compared to full-service platforms. The pricing is reasonable for what you get, but you're going to need other tools to fill the gaps. Most agencies using Local Viking pair it with BrightLocal or Whitespark for citations. If GBP management is your primary focus and you don't mind using multiple tools, Local Viking is worth considering. But if you want an all-in-one solution, look elsewhere. ### 9. GeoRanker GeoRanker is the budget option for local rank tracking. It doesn't have the features of premium tools, but it costs significantly less. For agencies just starting out or working with tight margins, it's a viable option. The rank tracking is accurate. You can track positions in the local pack and organic results. You can monitor multiple locations. And you can see historical trends over time. But the interface feels dated. The reporting is basic and not white-label friendly. And the workflow isn't optimized for agencies managing lots of clients. Everything takes more clicks than it should. The support is also limited. When I've had issues, response times have been slow. And the documentation is sparse compared to competitors. GeoRanker is fine if you're on a tight budget and just need a basic Google Business Profile tool for rank tracking. But as your agency grows, you'll probably outgrow it quickly. ### 10. Surfer Local Surfer Local is the new kid on the block. They're trying to compete with established players by offering a simpler, cheaper alternative. In some ways, they succeed. In others, they fall short. The GBP optimization features are decent. You can manage profiles, track rankings, and generate basic reports. The interface is clean and easy to use. And the pricing is aggressive, making it accessible to smaller agencies. But Surfer Local lacks the depth of established competitors. The citation building is minimal. The review management is basic. And the reporting doesn't offer the customization that agencies need for client work. I tested Surfer Local with five client accounts for two months. It was fine for basic tasks, but I kept running into limitations. Reports that didn't show what I needed. Workflows that required manual workarounds. Features that were promised but not yet delivered. Surfer Local might be worth watching as they develop. But right now, they feel like a beta product rather than a serious contender for agency work. ## The Part Where I Get Real About Pricing (Because It Matters) I need to talk about something that most software reviews gloss over. Pricing for local seo software is a nightmare for agencies. And the way these companies structure their costs can make or break your margins. Most local seo tools charge per client or per location. That makes sense from their perspective. But from an agency perspective, it's brutal. A client with 50 locations might pay you $3,000 a month. If your local seo software costs $10 per location, that's $500 in software costs alone. Add in labor, overhead, and profit margins get thin fast. LocalRank.so is one of the few that offers agency pricing that actually scales. You pay for the platform, not per client. That means your software costs stay flat as you grow. It's a huge advantage. I've seen agencies go under because they didn't account for software costs in their pricing. They won big clients with multiple locations, then realized their tool stack was eating all their profit. Don't be that agency. Before you commit to any local seo platform, do the math. Calculate what it will cost you at your current client count. Then calculate what it will cost at 2x, 5x, and 10x that number. If the pricing doesn't scale, think twice. ## Frequently Asked Questions People ask me all the time if they really need local seo software or if they can do everything manually. And the honest answer is that you can do everything manually if you hate yourself and have unlimited free time. But if you're running an agency with more than a handful of clients, software isn't optional. It's the difference between profitability and burnout. Manual citation building takes hours per client. Manual rank tracking is a nightmare. Manual GBP management across dozens of accounts is impossible. Good local seo automation handles the repetitive stuff so you can focus on strategy and client relationships. The question of whether to use one all-in-one tool or multiple specialized tools comes up constantly. And I've tried both approaches. For years, I used five different tools, each best-in-class for their specific function. It worked, but it was expensive and my team hated switching between platforms all day. Now I use LocalRank.so for most things and supplement with specialized tools when needed. It's simpler, cheaper, and my team is happier. My advice is to start with one all-in-one agency local seo tool and only add specialized tools if you find genuine gaps. People also want to know how much they should budget for local seo software. And the answer depends on your client count and needs. A solo consultant managing ten clients might spend $200-300 a month. A 20-person agency with 200 clients might spend $1,000-2,000. The key is to think about cost per client, not total cost. If you're spending $1,000 a month on software but managing 200 clients, that's $5 per client. If those tools save you 30 minutes per client per month, you're coming out way ahead. White-label reporting matters a lot for agencies, and not all local seo tools handle this well. Some offer beautiful white-label reports that make you look like a million bucks. Others slap your logo on a generic template and call it done. Before you commit to any platform, ask to see sample reports. Make sure they look professional enough to send to clients. And make sure you can customize them to match your brand. Finally, people always ask me which local seo software I would choose if I was starting over today. And the answer is LocalRank.so. It's not perfect, but it's the best balance of features, pricing, and agency-focused workflow that I've found. BrightLocal would be my second choice if LocalRank.so didn't exist. And if I was managing enterprise clients with hundreds of locations, I'd probably bite the bullet and pay for Yext. ## The Conclusion (And What I Actually Learned) Eight years ago, I started my agency with a laptop, a spreadsheet, and a lot of optimism. I thought I could manage local SEO for clients without expensive software. I was wrong. Over the years, I've tried virtually every local seo tool on the market. I've wasted money on software that didn't deliver. I've dealt with support teams that made me want to scream. I've spent countless hours exporting data from one platform and importing it into another. But I've also found tools that actually made my business better. Software that saved my team hours every week. Platforms that helped us deliver better results for clients. Tools that let us scale without hiring an army. The best local seo software for agencies in 2026 depends on your specific situation. Your client count. Your budget. Your team's technical skills. Your reporting needs. There's no one-size-fits-all answer. But if I had to give one recommendation, it would be LocalRank.so. It's the tool I wish existed when I started my agency. It's built by people who understand agency workflows. It scales without punishing you for growth. And it keeps getting better. That said, BrightLocal is still a solid choice if you want something proven. Whitespark is excellent if citations are your primary focus. And SEMrush makes sense if you need full SEO features beyond just local. The most important thing is to make a decision and stick with it. Tool hopping is expensive, both in subscription costs and in the time your team spends learning new platforms. Find something that works, optimize your workflows around it, and focus on delivering results for clients. Because at the end of the day, clients don't care what software you use. They care about results. Rankings. Traffic. Phone calls. Revenue. The best local seo platform is the one that helps you deliver those results efficiently and profitably. For me, that's LocalRank.so. For you, it might be something else. But whatever you choose, commit to it. Learn it inside and out. And use it to build an agency that lasts. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a client call in ten minutes. They're asking why their rankings dropped last week, and I need to check LocalRank.so to figure out what happened. Wish me luck.

    Import from clipboard

    Paste your markdown or webpage here...

    Advanced permission required

    Your current role can only read. Ask the system administrator to acquire write and comment permission.

    This team is disabled

    Sorry, this team is disabled. You can't edit this note.

    This note is locked

    Sorry, only owner can edit this note.

    Reach the limit

    Sorry, you've reached the max length this note can be.
    Please reduce the content or divide it to more notes, thank you!

    Import from Gist

    Import from Snippet

    or

    Export to Snippet

    Are you sure?

    Do you really want to delete this note?
    All users will lose their connection.

    Create a note from template

    Create a note from template

    Oops...
    This template has been removed or transferred.
    Upgrade
    All
    • All
    • Team
    No template.

    Create a template

    Upgrade

    Delete template

    Do you really want to delete this template?
    Turn this template into a regular note and keep its content, versions, and comments.

    This page need refresh

    You have an incompatible client version.
    Refresh to update.
    New version available!
    See releases notes here
    Refresh to enjoy new features.
    Your user state has changed.
    Refresh to load new user state.

    Sign in

    Forgot password
    or
    Sign in via Facebook Sign in via X(Twitter) Sign in via GitHub Sign in via Dropbox Sign in with Wallet
    Wallet ( )
    Connect another wallet

    New to HackMD? Sign up

    By signing in, you agree to our terms of service.

    Help

    • English
    • 中文
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • 日本語
    • Español
    • Català
    • Ελληνικά
    • Português
    • italiano
    • Türkçe
    • Русский
    • Nederlands
    • hrvatski jezik
    • język polski
    • Українська
    • हिन्दी
    • svenska
    • Esperanto
    • dansk

    Documents

    Help & Tutorial

    How to use Book mode

    Slide Example

    API Docs

    Edit in VSCode

    Install browser extension

    Contacts

    Feedback

    Discord

    Send us email

    Resources

    Releases

    Pricing

    Blog

    Policy

    Terms

    Privacy

    Cheatsheet

    Syntax Example Reference
    # Header Header 基本排版
    - Unordered List
    • Unordered List
    1. Ordered List
    1. Ordered List
    - [ ] Todo List
    • Todo List
    > Blockquote
    Blockquote
    **Bold font** Bold font
    *Italics font* Italics font
    ~~Strikethrough~~ Strikethrough
    19^th^ 19th
    H~2~O H2O
    ++Inserted text++ Inserted text
    ==Marked text== Marked text
    [link text](https:// "title") Link
    ![image alt](https:// "title") Image
    `Code` Code 在筆記中貼入程式碼
    ```javascript
    var i = 0;
    ```
    var i = 0;
    :smile: :smile: Emoji list
    {%youtube youtube_id %} Externals
    $L^aT_eX$ LaTeX
    :::info
    This is a alert area.
    :::

    This is a alert area.

    Versions and GitHub Sync
    Get Full History Access

    • Edit version name
    • Delete

    revision author avatar     named on  

    More Less

    Note content is identical to the latest version.
    Compare
      Choose a version
      No search result
      Version not found
    Sign in to link this note to GitHub
    Learn more
    This note is not linked with GitHub
     

    Feedback

    Submission failed, please try again

    Thanks for your support.

    On a scale of 0-10, how likely is it that you would recommend HackMD to your friends, family or business associates?

    Please give us some advice and help us improve HackMD.

     

    Thanks for your feedback

    Remove version name

    Do you want to remove this version name and description?

    Transfer ownership

    Transfer to
      Warning: is a public team. If you transfer note to this team, everyone on the web can find and read this note.

        Link with GitHub

        Please authorize HackMD on GitHub
        • Please sign in to GitHub and install the HackMD app on your GitHub repo.
        • HackMD links with GitHub through a GitHub App. You can choose which repo to install our App.
        Learn more  Sign in to GitHub

        Push the note to GitHub Push to GitHub Pull a file from GitHub

          Authorize again
         

        Choose which file to push to

        Select repo
        Refresh Authorize more repos
        Select branch
        Select file
        Select branch
        Choose version(s) to push
        • Save a new version and push
        • Choose from existing versions
        Include title and tags
        Available push count

        Pull from GitHub

         
        File from GitHub
        File from HackMD

        GitHub Link Settings

        File linked

        Linked by
        File path
        Last synced branch
        Available push count

        Danger Zone

        Unlink
        You will no longer receive notification when GitHub file changes after unlink.

        Syncing

        Push failed

        Push successfully