藝術、文化、地方脈絡與開放資料的跨域練習
Interdisciplinary Practice of Art, Culture, Local Context, and Open Data.

近來台灣在很多地方，出現了許多組織的形態，它們並不僅限於「傳統的藝術組織」。 這些組織是在特定議題出現之餘，結合各種不同領域的專業，進行對社會的提問，並發展出各種問題意識，促使社會與在地的各種面向被看見。這些組織特性以及目的皆不同，我們究竟應不應該定義組織的核心？這些組織包含有藝術組織、數位的社群、技術的社群又或者在地社區，其有多元的樣貌。然而，我們在進行跨域對話的時候，如何先從理解對方語言，在試著把自己的專業讓彼此了解，進而擴大各種可能性。 若我們希望擴及各領域的知識層面，促使更多人加入「地方」相關領域的研究和政策的推進，「開放」究竟是什麼？有哪些資料應該被「開放」？其治理層級的思維「開放」又應該怎麼做？希望涵蓋前述各種跨領域嘗試的經驗皆可來本議程軌一同分享、共筆其跨域練習的經驗。

Recently in Taiwan, many organizational forms have emerged that are not limited to “traditional art organizations.” These organizations arise in response to specific issues, integrating expertise from various fields to question society and develop awareness of various problems, making various aspects of society and local issues visible.
These organizations, with their diverse characteristics and purposes, prompt us to consider whether we should define the core of an organization.
They include art organizations, digital communities, technical communities, and local communities, each with its diverse appearance.
However, when engaging in interdisciplinary dialogue, how do we begin by understanding each other’s language, then try to make our expertise understood by each other, thereby expanding various possibilities.
If we hope to extend knowledge across fields, encouraging more people to join research and policy advancement in “local” areas, what exactly does “open” mean?
What kind of data should be “opened”?
How should the governance level of thinking be “opened”?
We hope to cover experiences from various interdisciplinary attempts in this track to share and collaboratively document the experience of cross-domain practices.