---
# System prepended metadata

title: Arihant Jain

---

# Arihant Jain

## Hamed

### Pros
Looks confident, proffessional and friendly
accpet his mistake easily
clear discussion - straight to the point
ask question when he needed more explanations
### Cons



## Arup
#### Pros:
:white_check_mark:Simple structure
:white_check_mark: Viewmodels are testable
:white_check_mark: Good Unit test coverage
:white_check_mark: Used swift package manager
:white_check_mark:  No Memory Leaks
#### Cons:
:small_red_triangle: Some cases use force unwrap
:small_red_triangle: Cell’s doesn’t have cell model
:small_red_triangle:Some places use delegate pattern and some case closure
:small_red_triangle:ViewController to ViewController delegate(Personally try to avoid in MVVM)
:small_red_triangle:I am confuse, why he make something coddle and somethings decodable.
:small_red_triangle:As @Johannes said, some unused code for caching

### Pros
Seems very confident
Have a good understanding of tech stack

### Cons


## Johannes
#### Project:
:large_yellow_circle: Unused image cache
:large_yellow_circle: Properties are not protected through protocols or read only - or private access
:large_yellow_circle: No interesting Tech was used
:large_yellow_circle: Uses class over struct for data model
:large_yellow_circle: One Controller is TableView, the other UIViewController - also datasource assigned in Storyboard :x:
:large_green_circle: Test-Coverage
#### App:
:large_green_circle:  No leaks
:large_yellow_circle: Minimal UI
#### Overall: 
Very inconsistent project - some times classes with decodable - some times struct with codable. Its like a flickenteppich. Overall a minimal - but function project without to maybe flaws - but definitely ways to improve.

### Pros
- Seems calm and comfortable
- Understands most of our urges (Delegate&Datrasource in Storyboard)
- Takes questions and criticism well

### Cons
- Little bit slacky with the project

## Stas

### Pros
- good communication skills
- similar team/company structure 
- solid explainer 
- making a fork of the framework to adjusting for the requrenments 
- not talking a lot
- aggresssive testing 

### Cons
- so the test task is still something that's looks like a sand box (not a production ready)


## Nanz

### Pros
- great comunication
- used to work in KPI driven teams
- experienced in release processes / Gitgflows
- A/B Testing, Feature Toggles
- Snapshot tests are a very esotheric way of testing
- Seems to be a honest guy
- No Bullshido
- accepts criticism 

### Cons
- sucked in live coding
- maby a chaotic coder (quick & dirty)?

## Milan

### Pros

### Cons