---
# System prepended metadata

title: 2023-07-25 meeting TEA case studies

---

---
tags: TEA events
description: 
---

:::info
* **Date: 2023-07-25
* **Time**: 11:00
* **Join via**: Teams
* **Call recording**: not available
    


:::

[TOC]

## Agenda

* **Theme**: 
* **Chair**: Chris
* **Links & resources:**

### Apologies
> *Please add your name below if you are not able to attend the meeting.*
* 


## Attendees
* Cass
* Chris
* Emma K
* 
* 
* 



### Notes
* Workshops planned for Assurance project (TEA) with healthcare regulators to understand their needs/requirements for an assurance tool
* There is mututal value in connecting health and TRIC communities, particularly on assurance project
    * Slide on Trustworthy and Ethical Assurance from [Cass' TRIC-DT Hub talk](https://zenodo.org/record/8112590)
* Early stage conversations have happened with Vicky and Malvika
* Assurance methodology developed from safety critical enginerring
* TEA is aiming to lower the barriers of entry to that methodology, providing a way to demonstrate that ethical practices have been met
    * Transparent and accessable communication with stakeholders to provide good evidence based reasons that they should trust you
* Turing RCM opportunity
    * We know that there are loads of people who care about fairness in healthcare
    * We'd like to put on structureed knowledge share events, where we help people build assurance cases
    * Cases would then be further developed within specific teams, including how to communicate the case with their communities (technical or lay)
    * These activities would become cases studies for us to learn about how people what to use it.
    * We feel there is value in developing the cases, and return value for us (TRIC, TEA) in understanding how the tool is used
* Ask:
    * Find people from your communities with a project which this could be applied to
        * Must be an active project which they can speak openly about with other researchers specifically to discuss how a fairness assurance case would be developed
        * Mature enough project and appropriate level of information
        * Doesn't have to be a project developed for deployment, could be theoretical, methodological.
        * 3 to 6 projects - multiple people from each project is fine.
        * Brieuc Lehman
        * AIM RSF - ask Eirini/Sophia
        * 
    * Attend ==2 x half-day workshops== (online/hybrid) (have some budget to cover catering and non-turing staff travel)
        * venue depends on who we recruit
        * hybrid is more difficult - go either fully in person or fully online
        * It's not just a teaching exercise, but also a "doing"
        * An online event could be done relatively quickly/easily; Enigma is booked up for September/October
        * A lot of the attendees will know eachother already, so less need for a in-person relationship building
* TIMELINES
    * Nothing before October, early November ish

Rapheal Z, (Genomics England) interested
  
 
   



### Action points for follow up 
* Chris to send briefing document for others to review and send to project reps.
* RCMs to identify 1-2 projects that could participate
* 
* 



### Next Meeting
* 
* 
* 
* 


### Information and Links  
* 
* 
* 
* 