---
# System prepended metadata

title: 'Phase Field Schema WG: July 2024'

---

Meeting agenda, notes and actions for 2024-07-31 at 12 noon ET

Organizer
: Daniel Wheeler

Attendees
: - Daniel Wheeler (he/him)
  - David Montiel (he/him)
  - Stephen DeWitt (he/him)
  - Kasra Momeni (he/him)
  - Trevor Keller (they/them), NIST

## Links

 - [Google Meet][meet]
 - [WG GitHub repository][repo]
 - [Google Docs][docs]
 - [Previous meeting notes][previous]
 - [Proposal document][proposal]
 - [Resource links][resources]
 - [Overleaf publication][overleaf]

## Agenda

1. Any questions or items to raise for discussion (please add)
1. Reminders
    - Next office hours:
        - 2024-08-02, Friday, 11AM ET
        - 2024-08-16, Friday, 11AM ET
    - Next WG meet
        - 2024-08-28, Wednesday, 12-noon ET
1. Current state of the RO-Crate example (work with Austyn Nguyen)
    - We are a lot more comfortable with RO-Crate and the possibilities
    - [New RO-Crate example](https://gist.github.com/wd15/4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be) 
    - [HTML view of RO-Crate](https://html-preview.github.io/?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/wd15/4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be/raw/7113e0cd239fc3199040078e8784eb0d2f657a44/ro-crate-preview.html)
    - [Graph view](https://json-ld.org/playground/#startTab=tab-expanded&json-ld=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.githubusercontent.com%2Fwd15%2F4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be%2Fraw%2Fd49c12b4a4bbcd9397bcae42848b5df989b879f6%2Fro-crate-metadata.json)
    - The benchmark spec is included alongside an environment file, inputs and outputs as well. 
    - `CreateAction` is the top level entity for the actual workflow
    - See [this](https://www.researchobject.org/workflow-run-crate/profiles/0.5/process_run_crate/) for more descriptions of how it works
    - [Bioschemas also used for `ComputationalTool`](https://bioschemas.org/types/)
1. We can push any new schema to be a subset of Workflow run ro-crate [here](https://github.com/ResearchObject/ro-terms/) 
    - However, this is not always necessary
    - [DefinedTerm](https://schema.org/DefinedTerm) gives a lot of possibilities
    - I think we need to think about adding a `specification` or `problemDefinition` field to the top-level of the exisisting RO-Crate terms. Possibly augement a `Dataset` to have a `governingEquations` field.
    - [The existing RO-Crate extra terms](https://github.com/ResearchObject/ro-terms/tree/master/workflow-run#terms-in-detail)
        - Notice that these have a lot of possibilities to add containers
        - A lot of the existing augmentations for Workflow run are for `CreateAction`, which I've demonstrated works well for our needs. 
2. Gave a short presentation to the [Workflow Run RO-Crate group]((https://www.researchobject.org/workflow-run-crate/)) about our use case and recieved some usefule feedback.
5. Galaxy's tutorial: [RO-Crate - Introduction](https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/fair/tutorials/ro-crate-intro/tutorial.html)
6. Ideas


## Notes / Action Items



<!-- links -->

[meet]: https://meet.google.com/bas-vkxi-rmq
[repo]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema
[docs]: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1zhUi3A-CXxrkh4gTkLVUOncdqAMIAXND
[previous]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/blob/main/meeting-minutes/meet-009_2024-05-29.md
[proposal]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/blob/main/proposal.md
[resources]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/discussions/5
[overleaf]: https://www.overleaf.com/project/663e34cc1c8095115e0de913

