---
# System prepended metadata

title: Meeting Minutes 11/6/2019 with TA office Hour
tags: [Deliverable Meeting]

---

Meeting Minutes 11/6/2019 with TA office Hour
===

###### tags: `Deliverable Meeting`

:::info
- **Location:** BA
- **Date:** Nov 4, 2019 8:00 PM
- **Agenda**
0. Deliverable 1 discussion with Adam `20min`
	> [name=Ming Jin Lu]
2. Deliverable 2 discussion `5min`
(https://)
- **Participants:**

    - Ming Jin Lu
    - Caiquan shi
    - Linyue Wu 
    
- **Contact:** Adam - "email"
- **Host:** Adamn
- **Reference:** - [CSC301 Meeting Minutes 11/4/2019, github divliverbale 1 md]

:::

## Meeting Notes
### Office hour comments: 
- Ambiguous description about server and deployment.
- Process should be a 3.
- Q1, 2 are good
- Q3: rewrite. why tasks are important to users and important to Q1?
- for overall quality: get rid off all templates and bullet points. -> 80(lose the bullet points and use headers) 
- email adam when done
- Mention github issues under Artifacts

### Deliverable 2 discussion
- instructions in readme -> talk about workflow, set some expectations, explain what are semi-working and what not. Work on the most important feature first
- quality part: justify why certain decisions are made, ex: lots of backend and simple front end to test out. 
- Complete at least one workflow. show we have some functionality: filter data, choose a team etc.

 Conclusion: We need clear description and explanation of why we choose to work on our current componenents.