---
# System prepended metadata

title: Onsen best practice

---

# Onsen best practice
# **Jury**
1. Jurors’ identity has to be kept confidential to avoid tampering/corruption by third parties
1. Jurors should rotate in order to elicit a wider participation from the community
1. Each jury must be made up of 1 core team member and 4 prominent community members
1. In each jury there must always be 1 member from the core team:
    1. his vote is binding and can’t be vetoed
    1. he has veto power on each vote
    1. he chooses the other 4 jurors among prominent community members


# Evaluation criterias
1. When each round ends we should evaluate how each coin has performed in terms of trading volume versus *value given*
1. Mandatory checks for each token:
    1. wash trading (yes/no)
    1. volume
    1. TVL
    1. token distribution breakdown
    1. daily # transaction
    1. how many votes are needed to pass?
    1. IF value given (sushi allocated) < value obtained (fees generated) THEN listing has been successful

do we care about wash trading?
I mean if they generate fees I don’t care...should I?
could it be dangerous for our reputation? 
if we start listing rugs on onsen maybe people won’t lp for onsen pairs

I’m all for a form. It should request information on key metrics (volume, TVL, daily users, daily # transaction, token distribution breakdown. Could also be interesting to know more about the team behind it (anon or not, how many devs, date of creation), as well as project safety indicators (audits, past exploits, etc…).
