---
# System prepended metadata

title: Untitled

---

### > summarize the uploaded documents

The uploaded documents consist of mentor interview forms from various individuals involved in the Proposal Mentor Marketplace (PMM), aimed at gathering insights to improve mentorship for newcomers and funded projects within the Project Catalyst ecosystem. Each document follows a similar format, asking for personal reflections, experiences, and suggestions for enhancing the mentorship process. Here's a summary of key points across several documents:

**General Approach:** Mentors were asked about their involvement with Project Catalyst, types of people or organizations they have mentored, how they conducted their mentorships (e.g., online sessions, workshops), and their active stages of mentorship (onboarding, proposal making, post-funding support).

**Positive Feedback:** Many mentors reported successful outcomes from their mentorship, such as helping projects get funded, assisting in proposal writing, and guiding new participants through the Catalyst process.

**Areas for Improvement:** Common suggestions included the need for more structured mentorship programs, enhanced resources and tools for mentors, and better support systems to track and manage mentoring activities.

**Specific Needs and Suggestions:**

- Yoram Ben Zvi highlighted the importance of making the Catalyst process straightforward and advocated for more organized onboarding and better integration of new technologies within the ecosystem​​.
- Jose De Gamboa suggested developing a permanent mentor development program with credentialed mentors​​.
- Yan Tirta emphasized decentralization and the need for clear, consistent documentation and structures to support the community's ethical and effective participation in Catalyst​​.
- Mauro Andreoli noted the importance of mentorship for non-native English speakers and advocated for a dynamic team to support mentorship programs financially​​.

These interviews serve as a foundation for PMM to analyze and prepare recommendations to refine and enhance the mentorship programs in Project Catalyst, reflecting a diverse range of experiences and viewpoints from across the ecosystem.

### > what might be cosidered suprising results?

In reviewing the mentor interviews from the Proposal Mentor Marketplace (PMM), several surprising insights emerge that may not align with conventional expectations about mentorship within a project-driven, collaborative ecosystem like Project Catalyst. These insights include:

*Less Emphasis on Technical Skills:*

Some mentors, like Yuta and Yan Tirta, noted that basic project execution skills such as proposal writing and marketing might be less crucial for mentorship than anticipated. This is contrary to what one might expect in a grant-funding environment, where proposal writing is often seen as key to securing funding​​​​.

*Decentralization Challenges:*

Yan Tirta's emphasis on the misunderstood aspects of decentralization as a core value and structural framework within the Catalyst project was insightful. He highlighted that while decentralization is a pillar of the blockchain community, its practical implications in mentorship and community engagement are not always clear or effectively communicated​​.

*The Role of Non-English Support:*

Mauro Andreoli pointed out the specific needs of non-native English speakers within the mentorship programs, which might not be an obvious priority in global, English-centric tech communities. His suggestion to focus more on this demographic could lead to more inclusive and effective mentoring​​.

*Financial Compensation for Mentors:*

Several mentors expressed a need for financial compensation or resources to allow individuals to dedicate themselves more fully to mentoring roles. This includes creating structured, paid positions within the mentorship programs, which contrasts with the typical volunteer or minimally compensated roles often seen in open-source and community-led projects​​​​.

*Mentorship for Onboarding Web 2.0 Companies:*

Yoram Ben Zvi suggested creating specific programs to help Web 2.0 companies transition to using blockchain technology, which is a unique and potentially highly impactful area for mentorship that bridges traditional businesses with new technology paradigms​​.
These points highlight unexpected areas of focus and potential gaps in the current mentorship model within Project Catalyst, suggesting avenues for innovation and improvement that might not align with initial assumptions about community needs and mentoring priorities.

### > Create a bulleted list of primary points to share back with the community, highlighting patterns, common themes, and possible actions to take next by the catalyst community. Try to make at least 20 points.

Here's a comprehensive bulleted list of primary points based on the mentor interviews from the Proposal Mentor Marketplace (PMM) that can be shared with the community. This list highlights common themes, patterns, and suggested actions for the Catalyst community to consider:

- Focus on Non-Technical Skills: Emphasize mentorship in soft skills and project management over purely technical aspects.
- Decentralization Education: Increase efforts to educate on the practical aspects and benefits of decentralization within the Catalyst ecosystem.
- Support for Non-English Speakers: Develop specific mentorship programs aimed at supporting non-native English speakers to increase inclusivity.
- Financial Compensation: Explore financial models to compensate mentors, allowing them to dedicate more time and resources to their roles.
- Structured Mentorship Paths: Create structured, tiered mentorship programs that cater to different levels of experience and needs.
- Online and Offline Balance: Maintain a balance of online and in-person mentorship to cater to diverse geographic and personal preferences.
- Enhanced Onboarding Programs: Develop comprehensive onboarding programs for new Catalyst participants to ease their initial engagement.
- Post-Funding Support: Increase support after funding, helping projects to sustain and scale their impact.
- Regular Feedback Loops: Implement regular feedback mechanisms between mentors and mentees to improve the quality of mentorship.
- Collaboration Tools: Provide tools and platforms that facilitate better collaboration and communication among community members.
- Mentorship for Proposal Writing: Despite some views, continue to support and refine proposal writing as a key skill for securing funding.
- Marketplace for Mentors: Develop a formal marketplace where project initiators can find and engage with accredited mentors.
- Documentation and Transparency: Improve documentation processes to ensure clarity and transparency in Catalyst operations.
- Incentivize Mentorship: Create incentives for effective mentorship, possibly through recognition programs or micro-rewards.
- Community-Driven Approaches: Foster a community-driven approach in developing new mentorship models and initiatives.
- Diverse Funding Cycles: Experiment with different funding cycles and amounts to determine what best encourages sustainable project development.
- Integration with Web 2.0: Facilitate initiatives that help traditional businesses integrate blockchain technology into their operations.
- Dedicated Resources for Mentors: Allocate dedicated resources such as information portals and training materials for mentors.
- Engagement in Global Summits: Utilize global summits and other large-scale events to promote Catalyst and engage potential new members.
- Development of Local Hubs: Encourage the formation of local hubs or communities to foster a more localized engagement and mentorship.
- These points can guide further discussions and development within the Catalyst community, focusing on enhancing the mentorship experience and ensuring the program's effectiveness and inclusivity.

### > take those and put them into 3 or 4 different themes or categories

Here's a reorganization of the primary points from the Proposal Mentor Marketplace (PMM) interviews into three thematic categories, each encompassing different aspects of the mentorship process and community engagement within Project Catalyst:

1. Program Structure and Mentor Support
- Financial Compensation: Explore financial models to compensate mentors, allowing them to dedicate more time and resources to their roles.
- Structured Mentorship Paths: Create structured, tiered mentorship programs that cater to different levels of experience and needs.
- Marketplace for Mentors: Develop a formal marketplace where project initiators can find and engage with accredited mentors.
- Dedicated Resources for Mentors: Allocate dedicated resources such as information portals and training materials for mentors.
- Incentivize Mentorship: Create incentives for effective mentorship, possibly through recognition programs or micro-rewards.
- Documentation and Transparency: Improve documentation processes to ensure clarity and transparency in Catalyst operations.

2. Inclusion and Community Engagement
- Support for Non-English Speakers: Develop specific mentorship programs aimed at supporting non-native English speakers to increase inclusivity.
- Decentralization Education: Increase efforts to educate on the practical aspects and benefits of decentralization within the Catalyst ecosystem.
- Engagement in Global Summits: Utilize global summits and other large-scale events to promote Catalyst and engage potential new members.
- Development of Local Hubs: Encourage the formation of local hubs or communities to foster a more localized engagement and mentorship.
- Integration with Web 2.0: Facilitate initiatives that help traditional businesses integrate blockchain technology into their operations.
- Online and Offline Balance: Maintain a balance of online and in-person mentorship to cater to diverse geographic and personal preferences.

3. Enhancement of Mentorship Effectiveness
- Focus on Non-Technical Skills: Emphasize mentorship in soft skills and project management over purely technical aspects.
- Enhanced Onboarding Programs: Develop comprehensive onboarding programs for new Catalyst participants to ease their initial engagement.
- Post-Funding Support: Increase support after funding, helping projects to sustain and scale their impact.
- Regular Feedback Loops: Implement regular feedback mechanisms between mentors and mentees to improve the quality of mentorship.
- Collaboration Tools: Provide tools and platforms that facilitate better collaboration and communication among community members.
- Mentorship for Proposal Writing: Continue to support and refine proposal writing as a key skill for securing funding.
- Diverse Funding Cycles: Experiment with different funding cycles and amounts to determine what best encourages sustainable project development.

These categories offer a structured way to view the diverse insights and recommendations from the mentor interviews, helping the Catalyst community identify areas for strategic development and improvement.
