# Solana DAO Improvements

## Bugs

- Transactions do not show a success message using Sollet.io wallet, they show error instead -- but it does work anyway...
- Update: confirmed on Phantom as well:
- When a transaction fails to show success, the UI will not update, requiring user to refresh to show that tokens are available or vote has been properly registered. It hangs as so:

- No way to "Return to Governance" (or main Realm) when in proposal page
- The page is unusable when you set the top voters to be more than 10, should rearrange the elements at bottom to the top:

## Features

- Allow user to choose number of tokens to deposit, rather than forcing all tokens
- Should really flesh out the wallet user is connected to in the header itself, not requiring click
- Add a refresh button (because refreshing browser requires user to re-auth wallet)
- Need some kind of area for descriptive text in the Realm:
- Add a name to Governances (instead of just identifying by Solana address)
- 
- In proposal user has voted on, show what they voted for
- Indicate clearly in the proposal page, what the configurations are (quorum, min yes votes, etc). They show in the main Governance description but NOT in the proposal itself
- Add a clear indication that the Vote result would be at any given time ("Insufficient Quorum", "Yes Votes Winning", "No votes Winning" being the three valid states)
- Each proposal should have a forum where ONLY USERS WHO HAVE GOVERNANCE TOKENS DEPOSITED (configurable minimum) CAN POST (how do we prevent people from withdrawing to different addresses to create false sense of support from multiple accounts?)
- The description should be more clearly shown as "non-technical description" -- the Signatory can write whatever they want here, so it's important to separate the description from the ACTUAL instructions represented by the proposal
- The instructions should not only be "simulated", but the source code of exactly what those instructions are doing should be clear and verifiable. The whole point of DAO is that they should be trustless from back to front
- Ability to have non-binding votes to take temperature of community on an issue a la snapshot:
- And separate forum that is not attached to proposals themselves, but pre-proposal discussion of what proposals should be launched
see e.g., https://gov.venomdao.org/t/on-price-concerns/1100
- Ability for experts to sign off on the code / instructions associated with a proposal as though it is "audited" similar to expert witness testimony in a court (ensuring layman description matches the reality of the instructions)