# Notes on Conflict Resolution and Values

Drawing some sample from metagov's airtable [https://airtable.com/shrgnUrj0dqzZDsOd/tbltBIhUFqZE1tfle/viw6J9mO9wrlSh3cg](https://airtable.com/shrgnUrj0dqzZDsOd/tbltBIhUFqZE1tfle/viw6J9mO9wrlSh3cg)

I will copy and paste sample from other projects conflict resolution section of their respective governing docs. Then hopefully we can make comments on the ones we like best and add it to our own governing doc.

## Sample Cases

### One Hive

> Our Standards
>
> Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include:
>
> Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
> Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
> Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
> Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience
> Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community
>
> Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
>
> The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind
> Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
> Public or private harassment
> Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission
> Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
>
> On-chain enforcement
>
> The on-chain mechanism for enforcement will depend on the completion of Celeste.
>
> The ability for the 1Hive protocol to enforce this covenant is limited to the direct interactions that community members have with the protocol, specifically the ability for community members to submit proposals to allocate Honey issuance or adjust protocol parameters.
>
> A community member will be required to stake Honey when submitting a proposal, attesting that the impact of the proposal could be reasonably considered to align with 1Hive’s social contract. A dispute can be created by another community member if they disagree with the proposers attestation by challenging the proposal and staking an equivalent amount of Honey. If after being challenged the proposal is not withdrawn, a decentralized oracle will be used to settle the dispute.
>
> Participants in the dispute resolution protocol are expected to review the proposal, this covenant, and related past disputes in order to provide a judgement that they feel best aligns with the established norms and intention of the 1Hive community.
>
> If the oracle responds in favor of the proposer the proposal will be unlocked and the challenger’s stake will be transferred to the proposer. On the other hand, if the dispute resolves in favor of the challenger the proposal will be removed from consideration and the proposers stake will be given to the challenger.
> Off-chain enforcement
>
> While there is no canonical off-chain forum that represents the 1Hive community, there are community spaces including the 1Hive GitHub, Discourse, and Discord communities, and others forums which may emerge in the future which are expected to adhere to this covenant.

### Aragon


### Bright DAO

> Our Values
>
> We are value-driven, (not profit-driven) and will strive to support and foster an inclusive economic system. We value integrity, radical inclusion and civic responsibility. Our core principles include positivity, critical thinking and thoughtfulness. We encourage progressive ideas, constructive discussion and transparent interactions. We also adopt the pledge and standards from our partner community 1Hive;
>
> We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
>
> Examples of behaviour that contributes to a positive environment for our community include:
>
> Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
> Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
> Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
> Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience
> Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community.
>
> Examples of unacceptable behaviour include:
>
> The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind
> Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
> Public or private harassment
> Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission
> Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting.

### Effect DAO

> 10. **RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES**
>
> **10.1** Informal Dispute Resolution: Members and Guardians and/or High Guard shall cooperate in good faith to resolve any Dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of, relating to or in connection with the Constitution or the DAO, including with respect to the formation, applicability, breach, termination, validity or enforceability thereof (“Dispute”). All resolutions are subject to final approval by the High Guard.

### Ethereum World



### HausDao

>**Dispute Resolution**
>
> If you no longer wish to support DAOhaus, you may Rage-quit at any time. Once you Rage-quit, you will receive an amount of DAI proportional to your remaining contribution plus HAUS tokens for any portion of your original contribution that has been spent by the DAO at the time of your Rage-quit. By joining HausDAO you agree that Rage-quitting shall be the only recourse available to you should you have any dispute with HausDAO or the members of HausDAO.

### LexDao

> Section 2.8 - Settlement of disputes. In any dispute between LexDAO and any of its members or former members which cannot be resolved through informal negotiation, it shall be the policy of LexDAO to prefer the use of mediation whereby an impartial mediator may facilitate negotiations between the parties and assist them in developing a mutually acceptable settlement. Neither party with a grievance against the other shall have recourse to litigation until the matter is submitted to mediation and attempted to be resolved in good faith. All LDC Membership agree that there is a preference to settle disputes amongst members or between members and LexDAO via decentralized dispute mechanisms via smart contract protocols.
>
> Section 2.9 - Transferability of Membership. Membership rights and interests may not be transferred except by vote of LexDAO membership. Any attempted transfer contrary to this section shall be wholly void and shall confer no rights on the intended transferee and shall be cause (though none is needed) to burn the LDC token through a Guild Kick member removal procedure.
>
> Section 2.10 - Withdrawal and Expulsion. A member may withdraw at any time upon notice to LexDAO through a vote to burn their LDC token. Said request will not be unreasonably denied and shall be deemed conclusively as the LDC Members intent to withdraw from LexDAO. A member may be expelled by LexDAO through the Guild Kick procedure established in paragraph 2.6 of this document and adopted by the membership. Upon termination of membership LDC token, all rights and interests in LexDAO shall cease except for rights to redemption of capital pursuant to Article V below (if any).

### Token Engineering Commons

> The Pledge
>
> We as members, contributors, and leaders declare to make participation in the TEC community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, sex, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and/or expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, ethnicity, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
>
> We promise to act in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community. Actions that contradict this attitude will be handled through Gravity, facilitating clear steps to receive assistance in the search and implementation of non adversarial solutions.
>
> Gravity behaves according to the TEC graduated sanctions 1 and commits to its use with respect to all individuals.
> Our Standards
>
> Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include:
>
> Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
> Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
> Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
> Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience
> Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community
>
> Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
>
> The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind
> Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
> Public or private harassment
> Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission (commonly called doxing)
> Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
>
> On-Chain
> Decision Making
>
> The Token Engineering Commons uses the Gardens 4 framework technology to manage the DAO configurations and allocate funds to projects that are aligned with its mission, vision and values.
>
> On-chain decision making mechanisms are Conviction Voting and TAO Voting. Conviction Voting should be used primarily for funds allocation. TAO Voting should be used for updating parameters, bug fixes, adding new features to the DAO and/or for emergency situations such as an attack to the DAO treasury.
> Enforcement
>
> The on-chain mechanism for enforcement will depend on the completion of Celeste 2.
>
> The ability for the Token Engineering Commons protocol to enforce this covenant is limited to the direct interactions that community members have with the protocol, specifically the ability for community members to submit proposals to allocate TEC issuance or adjust protocol parameters.
>
> The proposer will be required to deposit TEC tokens when submitting a proposal, attesting that the impact of the proposal could be reasonably considered to align with TEC’s social contract. A dispute can be created by another community member if they disagree with the proposer’s attestation by challenging the proposal and staking an equivalent amount of TEC tokens. If after being challenged the proposal is not withdrawn, a decentralized oracle will be used to settle the dispute with the right to appeal that decision within Celeste. If the oracle responds in favor of the proposer the proposal will be unlocked and the challenger’s stake will be transferred to the proposer. On the other hand, if the dispute is resolved in favor of the challenger the proposal will be removed from consideration and the proposer’s stake will be given to the challenger.
>
> Participants in the dispute resolution protocol are expected to review the proposal, this covenant, and related past disputes in order to provide a judgement that they feel best aligns with the established norms and intention of the TEC community.
> Off-chain
> Decision Making
>
> The TEC uses Advice Process 2 as its primary practice for flat decision making to empower contributors with agency to move their cultural proposals forward. Advice Process is written in the forum in the Advice Process section and promoted verbally in community calls. When a non-financial, no-code decision will likely affect a large part of the community, the use of off-chain voting and signaling tools are expected. The TEC recommends token weighted tools for off chain decision making, like Snapshot and Tokenlog. A decision is considered legitimate when it respects this covenant, is promoted to the awareness of the community and its results aren’t challenged within 2 weeks.
>
> It is possible that other off-chain decision making practices and tools be integrated and their use should be aligned with this covenant.
>
> TEC community spaces include the TEC Discord, Discourse and Github communities. Other forums or social platforms which may emerge in the future are expected to adhere to this covenant.
> Enforcement
>
> TEC intends to use Gravity and make use of its graduated sanctions in order to ensure community standards.
>
> The Gravity group aims to support the TEC by:
>
> Actively promoting trust and managing conflict between individuals, groups, and the community as a whole.
> Recognize boundaries and areas of potential dispute, as well as explicit violations of boundaries between individuals, groups, and the community as a whole.
> Supporting communication between community members and encouraging active participation.
> Promote community resilience and long-lasting human relationships by proactively co-creating boundaries, discussion and exchange in a system of shared values.
> Promote Advice Processes regarding the implementation of graduated sanctions 1 and commit to its use with respect to all individuals.

# Hack Our Own Values and Resolution

*Use this area to hack together our own Values and Conflict Resolution Part of our Constitution*

#### Discuss Section

> [name=boilerrat]TEC has one of the more interesting overall documents imho. Of note is it is a fork of 1Hive's covenant. So that one is worth noting as well.
> [https://forum.tecommons.org/t/tec-community-covenant/572](https://forum.tecommons.org/t/tec-community-covenant/572)
>
> [https://github.com/thelastjosh/govbase/blob/master/documents/constitutions/1Hive_Community_Covenant.md](https://github.com/thelastjosh/govbase/blob/master/documents/constitutions/1Hive_Community_Covenant.md)

[](https://)

#### Moon DAO Values

# Our Values

We uphold values of inclusion, peace, transparency, freedom of organization and speech. Space should be in the hands of the people, not any one nation or private entity.

As such, MoonDAO will support funding for individuals to go to space, acquisition and governance of symbolic assets (like lunar asteroids, or the lunar manual used in the first space mission), and fund future space research and exploration as it fits into the mission of becoming a governing body for the moon and other celestial bodies. MoonDAO is going to the moon!!