---
# System prepended metadata

title: WG Governance Meeting

---

# WG Governance Meeting 

## Participants 
* Damir Filipovic
* Giuditta del Buono
* Guenther Tschabuschnig
* Lukas Klingholz 
* Michael Leibfried 
* Stephan Dietrich
* David Schönwerth

* Lars (chair) absent 
* no co-chair elected and thus absent 

--> (14.33) Apparently this is not an offical meeting given absence of (co-)chairs.

Frank Ingenrieth had joined the call after (almost) everyone had left the call. 

[14:37] Frank Ingenrieth
ah, it seems i am exactly one minute too late. a good rest of the week everyone



## Readout of antitrust statement 

## Event-storming 

https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_lal-D8s=/?share_link_id=351553301789


### Where do we stand & what was added 
* presentation of findings of yesterday's call 
* Most events of the miro board are already in the JIRA, some are not, color typology also helps here 
* tldr: Michael started to move the miro elements into JIRA, so far he has roughly completed phase 4 and also some others - Michael has filed many requests into the JIRA board 
* Dominik had asked why we need to make it so complicated with the miro board 
    * (did not understand answer fully)
* Regarding the JIRA process (after items are filed, generally), it is not fully clear to us yet how this continues 
* JIRA process has 2 parts
    * substance 
    * capacity mgmt
* Req Eng Process is in a good place to get started. Collecting them is good but obviously not sufficient. People are not yet commonly and openly working on this. 
* Roland Fadrany has started with Przemek to start this off and see how all members can be involved

* A very important discussion that has many dimensions (including antitrust): How can commercial models be defined within a data space? With that, we mean pricing and tarif models when selling / licensing / ... data. 
* This can even be a problem in settings without prices
* "what is the price of this dataset" 
    * It is very difficult to understand the different layers involved
    * Pricing models can become arbitrarily complex and will thus be challenging to implement within Gaia-X 
    * Still, without being able to implement pricing etc in CODE (not paper based bilateral contract etc), it will difficult to impossible to implement are productive dataspace 



### Short rather bilateral exchange on technical WG and other workstreams between Bitkom & Red hat

### Next steps
* adress technical items as first step (where?)
* adress business / economic items as second step (where? WG lead?)


// I understood both will be discussed with WG Gov leads (is that correct?)