2020秋季第三場研讀紀錄

2020秋季第三場研讀紀錄 === ###### tags: `TCPSR` `Reproducibility` :::info - **研讀主題:** Many Labs 2 - **地點:** [社會創新實驗中心](https://silab.sme.gov.tw/) 202會議室 - **youtube直播連結:** - **日期時間:** Sep 11, 2020 11:00 AM (CST) - **討論流程** 1. 文獻領講 `15min` > [name=CWL]簡報 2. 迷你課程 `45min` > [name=CWL]講授 3. 自由討論 - **參與者簽到:** [表情符號包](https://github.com/ikatyang/emoji-cheat-sheet) - :woman:周蔚倫 (cwl) - :man:陳紹慶(csc) - :man:何明洲(hmc) - :man:林君昱(cyl) - :man:龔俊嘉(cck) - :+1: 劉効樺(SHL) - **領講人:** CWL - **研讀文獻:** [Klein, R. A. et al., (2018).](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2515245918810225) ::: ## 文獻領講 - [領講簡報](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LrxuWcd4DgsqjSdLxYc8r4pddCEF80T0/view?usp=sharing) (筆記與討論紀錄區) csc: 筆記開始。延伸參考資料~[ManyLabs 2 OSF](https://osf.io/8cd4r/); [Github](https://github.com/ManyLabsOpenScience/ManyLabs2) cwl: 舉出引用數高中低三篇replication study介紹：Effect of framing on decision making (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981, Study 10), Trolley Dilemma 2: principle of double effect (Hauser et al., 2007, Study 1, Scenarios 3 and 4), Priming “heat” increases belief in global warming (Zaval, Keenan, Johnson, & Weber, 2014, Study 3a) csc: 有關WEIRD sample的參考文獻~ Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X CWL: 品質保證題值得以後的網路研究借鏡 CCK: 研究的挑選 curate science 主頁 https://curatescience.org/app/article/50 curate science操作示範 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abJStJvwFxc :::success 領講後討論主題： What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications? [Wolfgang Stroebe (2019)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01973533.2019.1577736): - Do these replication studies inform us about the replicability of social psychological research？ cwl: 不能直接對應，但是replication結果之間的比較就有價值 - Can replications detect fraud(造假)? CSC: 提供[data clean note](https://manylabsopenscience.github.io/ML2_data_cleaning) 這樣的資料程序可能可減少造假事件 - Does the failure to replicate a finding indicate that the original result was wrong? HMC: 如何從EFFECT SIZE的CHART判斷STUDY有被REPLICATE cyl: Table的p value如何對照報告內容? cwl: 測試網路實驗有效性的出口調查 - do these replications help to support or disprove any social psychological theories? ::: ## 自由討論