<style> code { border:1px outset #bbb; } strong {color:green; } em {color:red; } </style> # Thesis feedback ###### tags: `Group Meeting` ## Comments from E1 * [x] b/w printed color figures *ignored* * [ ] swap Charpter 2 and 3 * [x] Grammatical mistakes *too general* * [x] "none of contiguity, completeness, or correctness can dominate PDR". What is dominate? *used "overwhleming impact", but also can explain more "in the sense of that PDR ..."* * [x] clearly state the input and output *revised pipeline diagram* * [x] clearly state the meaning of the kth element and the meaning of the jth row *added a line* * [x] define progeny and basic concepts like genetic linkages *add footnote and genetic map definition* * [x] formally define the loss. How do you compute the similarity between joints? You need to state them clearer. *add E-value stuff and better figure explanation* * [x] For the figures, indicates what are the genomes *clear enough* * [x] explain whythe CAST method can work for polyploidy *clear enough* * [x] rewrite the sentence in the first 3 lines * [x] comment on the effect of repeats for your PDR metric *show by different repeat solution(max, min)* ## Comments from E3 * [x] compare CAST with genetic-based methods. *all are no longer maintained, can implement one if really need.* * [x] explain why SALSA was not used in 2.3.3 *no Hi-C data available for this dataset* * [x] add a dataset with known reference genome to access correctness *already has A. Thaliana* * [x] compute PDR for result 2.3.6 (PDR by # progeny and seq depth) *added* ## Comments from E2 * [x] cite their papers *cited* * [x] More explanations for Figures and tables. *added* * [x] supporting evidences for polyploidy *explained in future work (original version)* * [x] Add explanation to Figure 2.1 *added* * [x] Some important concepts such as heterozygotes and polyploidy should be introduced in the Chapter 1 *added by footnote* * [x] Section 2.2.2. In text, the definition for genotype vector is given for multiple progenies. However, Figure 2 depicts a scenario in which there is only on progeny. *the definition is clear enough* * [x] Page 3, “by abduction”? *added footnote* ![](https://i.imgur.com/OJNnzC8.png)