## RBAC tests Progress and discussion
Date: 16/06/2021

### Liason: svyas
### Questions:

As per the research, we concluded that whenever a api is called within patrole for its testing, its the call to its client.

For example,
we have method create-network()...to test this method, api call would go for the neutron client.

https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/583340/

So while writing the RBAC test for create_log..., we got to know that openstack uses python's default logging extensions..we dont have client for it.
Now, question is which api should I consider to call?

Review:- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/795548
https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/?expanded=list-logs-detail,create-log-detail#log-resource

here, we dont see any kind of assertions with expected and actual data. So, How do RBAC-tests test the api?

kopecmartin's inputs:-
draft a email for openstack-discuss and then wait for answers.

## 17/06/2021

- Mail has been drafted and gmann has replied to it.
- https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#label/openstack-discuss/FMfcgzGkXmhwGHwPqtlNnwCXFqBHWPlh
- Basically, yes we require client in tempest to write a RBAC test within a patrole.
- But, logging resource doesnt have any client in tempest and python's logging can't be used because of debugging issues.
- So, first, we require a logging resource client in tempest for the logging resource neutron coverage in patrole.

## 23/06/2021

- Needs testcases and more modifications with the log-resource client
- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/796842