---
# System prepended metadata

title: 2020-06-17 Authorization Panel

---

# 2020-06-17 Authorization Panel

## Agenda

* [Clarify purpose of this panel #70](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/70)
* [Align panel name and properties with panel purpose #71](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/71)
* [Prioritize initiatives for the panel #72](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/72)
* [Handle User-Focused Client Constraining Access Control via the ACL #68](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/68)
* [Next week agenda](https://hackmd.io/j1W-01rXSRm5CVZw7E8BMg)

## Present

- Henry S
- Justin B
- Jackson M
- elf Pavlik
- Josh C

## Minutes

### [Clarify purpose of this panel #70](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/70)

- Jackson: I recall that we considered WAC as set in stone.
- Justin: Aaron submited a lot of issues pointing out amibiguities. We also have proposals to exted it like taggin from Michel.
- ...: I see original purpose to narrow. New one needs to cover WAC and access requests.
- Pavlik: I think taking look at initiatives can help us clarify how broad purpose do we need.

### [Prioritize initiatives for the panel #72](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/72)

- Justin: It's based on minutes from previous week. It also incorporates some perspectives from editorial meetings. TimBL agrees that we need normative WAC draft.

- Pavlik: Should include an initiatize for requesting access (see ruben's proposal and the ecosystem proposal by interop panel). *Noted in the github issue*.

- Jackson: mentioning [Create a Generalizable baseline for interop #74](https://github.com/solid/authorization-and-access-control-panel/issues/74)


## Votes

Initiatives:

Use cases and Requirements: JB+1, EP+1, JC+1, JM+1, HS+1
WAC normative Draft: JB+1, JM+1, EP+1, JC+1, HS+1
Resolving client constraints: JC+1, JM+1, JB+1, HS+0, EP+1

Vote on purpose in #70 - EP+1, JM+1, HS+1, JB+1

Vote on panel name - Proposed: Authorization Panel - JM+1, HS+1, EP+1, JB+1


## Actions

- EP: Use cases and requirements for ACL rule privacy (keep confidential case)
- JB: Document initiatives that received votes
- JB: Action based on results of 70, 71, 72