# GO-AAR {%hackmd WdEeg3SdQ-OHU9QFfiW1hg %} ## Geospatial Open After Action Review 2024-01 on the response to the Noto Peninsula Earthquake in 2024 --- ## [After Action Review (AAR)](https://odi.cdn.ngo/media/documents/6431.pdf) 1. What was supposed to happen? 2. What actually happened? 3. Why were there differences? 4. What would you do differently next time? --- ## Scope of review - Any actions in response to the Noto Peninsula Earthquake in 2024-01. - Any project related to 1. --- ## What was supposed to happen? - cloud-native data sharing asap. - diverse and value-adding uses. - better customer experience. - just do something, because we do not even know about the source data. --- ## What actually happened? - cloud-native data sharing happend. - such data sharing are not well documented. - there are both open and non-open services. This is a good thing. - SNS such as X feels less effective to gather information. S/N getting smaller. - by dividing roles, successfully achieved prototyping --- ## Why were there differences? - we have no big collective customer-base yet. - the spirit of challenge and playfulness. --- ## What would you do differently next time? - better network and communication, probably through sustained community. - better shared vision and aim. - full automation. --- ## Acknowledgements - add when it is necessary or appropriate.