IES incentivize people to create impact evaluation reports. Everyone can be a evaluator on IES, and they conduct impact evaluations on specific projects and create attestations on the blockchain. The reports created are approved through the DAOs on-chain governance and the evaluator can qualify for tokens for retroactive funding. Grant operators such as Optimism and Gitcoin can permissionlessly reference the project's impact evaluations through IES.
Many ways to fund public goods and OSS have been invented in the last few years. Examples include Quadratic Funding and Retroactive Public Goods Funding. These have been very successful and have brought great value to previously unfunded projects. The problem, however, is that there is no outcome measurement or evaluation of what value the projects have subsequently brought to the world. In the case of retrospective funding, there are also cases where funding is provided without properly evaluating the results and impact of the project. Outcome measurement is being done by Open Source Observer based on-chain and Github activity, and projects such as Karma GAP are now able to observe project progress and outputs on a milestone basis.
Beyond that, there are still many issues to be addressed regarding evaluation. Originally, project impact evaluations are very human resource and time consuming, and in the world, when involved in Social Impact Bond(SIB), we sometimes outsource project impact evaluations to a group of experts, but these are contracts that exceed several million dollars. If you are going to put this amount of money into an evaluation for funding a public good, you might as well put the money into funding it. However, incentives for evaluators are essential, and IES exists to address this issue.
Overview
Image Not ShowingPossible Reasons
The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted