--- title: Priručnik za komunikaciju o vakcinaciji protiv kovida-19 tags: languages, live-v0.1.3, serbian, entrypage permalink: https://c19vax.scibeh.org/sr lang: sr --- ![](https://i.imgur.com/CT0sqxq.png) # Priručnik za komunikaciju o vakcinaciji protiv kovida-19 :::success :arrow_backward: [Sažetak za donosioce odluka](https://c19vax.scibeh.org/sr/summary) ::: [Kliknite ovde da preuzmete](https://osf.io/hpuzv/download) <iframe src="https://mfr.de-1.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/hpuzv/?direct%26mode=render%26action=download%26mode=render" width="100%" scrolling="yes" height="680" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen></iframe> <!--<iframe src="https://widgets.figshare.com/articles/14483016/embed?show_title=1" width="100%" height="680" allowfullscreen frameborder="0"></iframe>--> <br> <br> :::warning Ako vam se ne otvori pdf-čitač, priručnik možete da čitate i preuzmete sa [OSF](https://osf.io/hpuzv/) i [figshare](https://figshare.com/articles/book/Priru_nik_za_komunikaciju_o_vakcinaciji_protiv_kovida-19/14483016). ::: ---- {%hackmd GHtBRFZdTV-X1g8ex-NMQg %} {%hackmd TLvrFXK3QuCTATgnMJ2rng %} {%hackmd oTcI4lFnS12N2biKAaBP6w %}
Last changed by  
 
SciBeh C19 Vax
Team web space for the covid-19 vaccine Wiki
3393

Read more

Argument quality and fallacies

Arguments can be good or bad, and that difference is not just a matter of subjective preference. Rather, argumentation research has spent centuries identifying how and why some arguments are stronger than others. This includes understanding why some arguments (so-called ‘fallacies’) can fool the unwary into thinking they provide good reasons for believing or doing something when, in fact, they do not.

3/8/2024
Vaccine Deniers

Attitudes towards vaccines span a whole range, from full endorsement to complete rejection:<sub>Source: UNICEF</sub>

3/8/2024
Politics of COVID-19 Misinformation

The politics of misinformation related to COVID-19 In many countries, COVID-19 and measures to address it, including vaccination, have become heavily politicized with important negative effects in the public's willingness to be vaccinated and follow the WHO and government relevant guidelines. In this unit, we present findings that illustrate the politicization of Covid-19 and its disastrous effects (vaccine hesitancy, disobedience in measures like mask wearing etc.), as documented in research from all around the world. Then, we discuss the most significant factors that have contributed to this phenomenon (psychological characteristics of people, motivated misinformation by malevolent agents, conflicts of interest between countries and companies etc.). The politicization of COVID-19: evidence and effects A clear factor that affects beliefs and attitudes regarding Covid-19 is political ideology and partisanship. In a multi-country study conducted before Covid-19 vaccines were available, significant differences were found between countries, indicating that trust in government was a strong predictor of vaccine acceptance (Lazarus et al., 2021): people who trust their government are much more likely to accept getting vaccinated than those who do not. Many more studies have investigated the effect of partisan differences and epistemological attitudes on vaccine hesitancy in specific countries. After more than two years since the pandemic struck, a clear consensus has been formed: political partisanship significantly affects people's beliefs regarding Covid-19 and their attitudes towards vaccine and behavioral measures, often leading to science denialism and believing in conspiracy theories. America Beliefs In the United States, a worrisome partisan gap in perceptions regarding COVID-19 and responses to relevant government measures emerged between conservatives / republicans and progressives / democrats. For example, an analysis of over 1.1 million survey responses collected daily between April and September of 2020 found that levels of concern have come to deviate sharply between Republicans and Democrats over time, regardless of the incidence of the disease in respondents' local areas, as has individuals’ willingness to stay-at-home and reduce mobility in order to help contain the pandemic (Clinton et al., 2020). Similarly, Calvillo et al. (2020) found that U.S. conservatives tended to view the virus as less severe, and often believed that the spread of the virus was a conspiracy. Similarly, a longitudinal study on COVID attitudes identified a decrease in the willingness to vaccinate among Republicans, while Democrats attitudes remained stable (Fridman et al., 2021).

3/8/2024
Conspiracy theories

Pandemics have always been a fertile breeding ground for conspiracy theories, and the COVID-19 pandemic is no exception. When people suffer a loss of control or feel threatened, they become more vulnerable to believing conspiracies.

3/8/2024
Read more from SciBeh C19 Vax
Published on HackMD